01/11/2006
Here! TV to make its content available on Google Video.
UNAIDS and other rights organizations condemn the recent arrest of four individuals in northern India for homosexuality, saying archaic laws need to be updated: "Criminalisation of people most at risk of HIV infection may increase stigma and discrimination, ultimately fuelling the AIDS epidemic."
SCOTUS hearing moments: Alito has "no specific recollection" of Princeton group he joined which specifically opposed the school's admission of women and minorities. Also, unlike John Roberts, Alito refuses to say that Roe v Wade is "the settled law of the land." Durbin goes on to further expose Alito's views on abortion.
Queerty hits up our bud Trent from Pink is the New Blog for some answers about making fun of celebrities and how he developed his signature 'pink font on photos' style: "I worked on a creative writing piece for a Master's program where I cut out pictures from magazines and pasted them into a blank book and then wrote all around and over the pictures. That was sort of where the whole thing got started." See, education can pay off in some unexpected ways!
Posted 10:21 AM EST by Andy Towle in Elsewhere | Permalink
Like it?
Subscribe to FREE Towleroad daily headlines with our RSS feed!
RECENT STORIES:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.








Andy-
I do not have a subscription to Broadcasting Cable. Do you know when this is going to occur, and will these videos be available for the video iPod? DirecTv cancelled Here TV's coverage without notice AND kept charging us a monthly fee until we noticed it (and you told us), so we are unfortunately without this service. And Dante's Cove was so campy we had to watch it.
Posted by: Gary | Jan 11, 2006 1:54:24 PM
>>Alito refuses to say that Roe v Wade is "the settled law of the land."
Instead of fighting to uphold Roe, which has always stood on shaky ground, somebody ought to be finding a new argument. If the right to abortion is constitutionally guaranteed, which I believe it is, why hasn't someone come up with a winnable case?
I think the time has come to abandon Roe, and build pro-choice arguments on sound law. Like the out-dated space shuttle, it has served it's purpose, and earned a place in history, but it's only being held together with sticking plasters and bailing wire.
Sometimes it's easier to move forward, if you leave some of your baggage behind.
Posted by: Jay Croce | Jan 11, 2006 10:46:26 PM