02/23/2006
David Hockney portraits spanning five decades go on display in Boston.
GQ anointed "gayest magazine" in new study.
Rumors fly again as a photo of what might possibly be the new video iPod hits the web. Is this what's tied to Apple's announcement of "fun new products" on Tuesday?
Edinburgh introduces LGBT history walk spanning 500 years in the lives of Scotland's gays. Kilts not included.
Who's counting Bush's mistakes? (via queerty)
Posted 1:44 PM EST by Andy Towle in Elsewhere | Permalink
Like it?
Subscribe to FREE Towleroad daily headlines with our RSS feed!
RECENT STORIES:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
It's not astounding to me that Men's Health was as high on the list as it is since it is always graced by men like Jason Statham (my perfect husband) and Rusty Joiner (the most beautiful man in the world). What IS astounding is why I and so many other gay men continue to buy it. The rag is so freaking het. that it almost burns my eyes to read it!
I am waiting for Apple to come out with an iPod/satellite radio combo. I certainly don't want the video thingees. I can't imagine watching Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia on a screen smaller than my flaccid member.
Posted by: JT Stout | Feb 23, 2006 4:38:26 PM
GQ has some pretty good writing, and the awards to prove it. Showing once again that gays have good taste (for the most part, I apologize for Britney and American Idol...). GQ's editor is openly gay, pro-Democratic, and respectfully anti-Bush and anti-Republican. So what's not to love? Plus, they hire some hot people (men and women!). And I love my Entertainment Weekly, it has good writing as well. TV Guide? Who reads that crap anymore? Their new format is horrid. I loved it as a kid, up till high school. Newsweek and Time both have crappy writing, dumbed down for middle America. I like Consumer Reports, but not enough to subscribe.
Posted by: Hal | Feb 23, 2006 4:38:46 PM
PS Details is pretty gay (love the hot men on their covers). And they make a point of having at least one obviously very gay article every month. I like their new layout and format (a couple of years old). Yeah, Men's Health has some great cover guys; they have increased their fashion layouts (there's the annual style issue), so I actually get something out of it. GQ throws some great parties/events! Interesting that Esquire is not there. Going to an Esquire party tonight. I remember that magazines like FHM and Stuff are killing traditionals like GQ and Esquire because of all the naked hot girls they keep putting on the covers. But that only makes for newsstand sales, not subscriptions.
Posted by: Hal | Feb 23, 2006 4:45:03 PM
Remembering that I didn't know who the heck Tom Ford is and the education I received last week, I guess I'm surprised that Vanity Fair isn't on the list. Although, maybe it's circulation isn't large enough as may be the case with Esquire.
Posted by: JT Stout | Feb 23, 2006 6:05:02 PM
Did you all read the article on Bush mistakes? I think my heart and soul just died... it was the most depressing but necessary reality check. We're all fu*#ed. Pretty soon we'll be hailing passing gasoline powered candela’s to our minimum wage jobs making weapons for invading Canada for it's illegal pharmaceuticals and weapons of mass destruction while the Republican party holds fundraiser sex parties f**kin' other free countries and getting head from big business while we all debate over the next iPod while dancing twisted to the next new sounds of the hot new DJ we spent $9.99 in iTunes remembering when things were better and bitching about how much they suck when in reality we've let our own indifference and capitalism "keeping up with the Jones'" distract us from the fact the Republican Party and Big Business have been putting this into motion since the 1970's taking more money and power away from the average Joe ensuring the military's strength grows not only to control other nations from taking the U.S. off the throne but for keeping the people INSIDE the country from uniting under their own leadership to get back what has been rightfully stolen from us: our FREEDOM. Think about it...
Posted by: CJ | Feb 23, 2006 9:34:14 PM
Damn, that was one long run-on sentence.
Posted by: Blue | Feb 23, 2006 10:11:25 PM
And there were no commas. It may give James Joyce a run for the money.
Posted by: JT Stout | Feb 24, 2006 6:42:06 AM
I think it might be a poem.
Posted by: JT Stout | Feb 24, 2006 8:58:16 AM