11/27/2007
Kevin Federline Does Details
Britney Spears' ex Kevin Federline as been named one of the most 50 influential men under 45 by Details magazine, according to MSNBC.
"I’d actually like to play somebody other than a bad guy or an ass," Federline tells the publication, adding, "To be a father is… everything. It shows me how little I am."
While Federline's parenting skillz are forefront in the MSNBC pullquote (and it's pretty unbelievable to have to admit that K-Fed looks like the responsible one in the Spears-Federline saga), it's hard not to notice the strategically-placed coverline: "Are you turning your kid into a douchebag?"
Then again, it appears Britney got that responsibility in the divorce.
Posted 11:00 AM EST by Andy Towle in Britney Spears, Kevin Federline, Magazines, News | Permalink
Like it?
Subscribe to FREE Towleroad daily headlines with our RSS feed!
RECENT STORIES:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Outside of the two children under his care, WHO, exactly, is under the influence of Kevin Federline?
Posted by: Gregoire | Nov 27, 2007 11:06:14 AM
Wow, Details has sunk to a new low---and that's saying something. Kevin Federline is powerful and important to no one. Their kids are probably hatching runaway plans as I write this.
Posted by: Paul | Nov 27, 2007 11:08:29 AM
This piece of white trash has had his 15 minutes of fame x 100. Details should be ashamed.
Posted by: Jack | Nov 27, 2007 11:24:57 AM
why is this trailer-trash scumbag influential? surely this is NOT what american society has come to??!!
oh, i forgot: america is BUSH country, where everything is opposite; where reason equals idiocy; where justice equals torture; where stupidity makes you president....
Posted by: nic | Nov 27, 2007 11:27:22 AM
Visiting your site for the first time after some of my friends said good things about it. Seeing something here about Federline makes me wonder what the hell they were talking about. Isn't there enough trash in the world?
Posted by: Anon | Nov 27, 2007 11:32:43 AM
Is this a joke?!
Posted by: A | Nov 27, 2007 11:37:27 AM
All these magazines are bullshit!
Posted by: soulbrotha | Nov 27, 2007 11:38:10 AM
I would suck his cock in the front seat of a Trans-Am with t-tops *any* day of the week.
Posted by: peterparker | Nov 27, 2007 11:40:46 AM
K-Fed is sexxxy and although he shouldn't be considered influential on ANY level, he's still smokin' HOT! Damn you, Britney!
Posted by: Shabaka | Nov 27, 2007 11:53:59 AM
I can't believe anyone thinks he's hot. Especially with this haircut. He's a Hollywood-hopeful redneck.
Posted by: Paul | Nov 27, 2007 12:04:43 PM
Why do they have an article on fake boobs???
Posted by: anon (gmail.com) | Nov 27, 2007 12:14:51 PM
Tragic.
How anyone would think this trash is hot is beyond me. It's just blind luck that he's not living in a trailer with a meth lab somewhere.
How truly awful for those poor children to have them for parents (as much as I like Britney).
Posted by: Jordan | Nov 27, 2007 12:33:29 PM
Well, well, naming that piece of uneducated, talentless, irresponsible waste of human DNA "influential" tells us all we need to know about the justifiably low regard in which DETAILS (caps theirs) is held by those who think.
And PP, you are scaring us (at least me, anyway). First you suck-up to that bigoted self-loathing wanna-be actor troll in a previous thread and now you want to suck-up (literally) to this scraping of the Earth. To each his own but try to be a little bit more discriminating where you put your lips. After all, you know where KF's dick has been and that is a truly scary locale.
Posted by: rudy | Nov 27, 2007 12:44:15 PM
Rudy,
A) I've always thought K-Fed was hot. He is my Redneck Fantasy #1. B) What 'bigoted self-loathing wanna-be actor troll have I sucked up to? C) Why don't you let me worry about where I put my lips?
xo,
peterparker
Posted by: peterparker | Nov 27, 2007 1:10:05 PM
He's been on the cover of Details before, and that's when I stopped taking the magazine serious, and canceled my subscription. Come on...Kevin "Golddigger" Federline influential? Just because he secured his future with cash by getting Sha and Britney pregnant? I was hoping to see him dissapear out of the picture after the divorce!
Posted by: Dutchimport | Nov 27, 2007 1:10:38 PM
Scum of the earth, retard, Goldigger, selfloathing, talenteless, etc...All that may be true but then again I know very little about the guy...I'll stick to what I know or more like what I see...And I see a fine a$$ white guy with a killer faux-hawk...At least in my books!
Posted by: Shabaka | Nov 27, 2007 1:21:49 PM
Ah, it's good to confirm why I didn't continue my Details subscription. Just who is Kevin influencing besides his little 'mistakes?' Talk about two-bit! Sure, he's f*ckable in that wrong side of the greasy tracks way but influential? Obviously he gave it up for someone old queen at Details.
Posted by: bryan | Nov 27, 2007 2:30:15 PM
Ok. so being a good father gets you on a mag cover??? he's only known because he hooked up tih Brit.
I wonder what i have to do to become famous. I'm gonna come out with a sex tape with some D-list celeb, and then act like it was stolen. I'll be on mag covers too.
But atleast Kim Kardashian was actually in a movie (ok, bad joke), but to put Kevin in the cover just shows that DETAILS must have low sells and they want ppl talking. it's brilliant from a business aspect, but long-term???
and do men really look up to him? i really doubt it. that's like saying Diddy's baby-mama(no offense) is influential. I'm not into poppin' a whole bunch of kids for the sake of the ability to buy a Birken bag.
Posted by: Asia | Nov 27, 2007 3:12:47 PM
"Obviously he gave it up for someone old queen at Details."
LMAO! Yes, this is surreal, I cannot imagine why he on the cover, much less as someone influential.
Posted by: PROFESSIONAL SKEPTIC | Nov 27, 2007 5:19:34 PM
While, he put the trash in white, he is still one hot, sexy, and, I bet packing dude. I'd do him, after a good sanitizing to rid him self of all things Brit Brit, other than her money of course, LOL!
Posted by: Sebastian | Nov 27, 2007 6:17:51 PM
This is so sad it's stupid. Saying he is a good dad next to Britney is like saying he's a better dad than Jeffrey Damer.
Seeing who we have in the Whitehouse I'd say the bar has been lowered to as low as it could go, although there is always Mayor 9/11.
Posted by: patrick nyc | Nov 27, 2007 6:58:03 PM
And, Jack, don't forget that in Bush Country "War=Peace"; Death=Life; "Up=Down"; "Black=White". And, soulbrotha, I'd do the same. There just ain't anything juicier than a nice piece of "trailer trash" meat.
Posted by: mike | Nov 28, 2007 5:24:27 AM
And, Jack, don't forget that in Bush Country "War=Peace"; Death=Life; "Up=Down"; "Black=White". And, soulbrotha, I'd do the same. There just ain't anything juicier than a nice piece of "trailer trash" meat.
Posted by: mike | Nov 28, 2007 5:24:41 AM
Man, you all are rough on the guy! Who are you all to judge? Maybe the guy has a checkered past..and maybe made a few mistakes along the way, but give the guy a break. Is it impossible to believe that he is trying to live a better life? I really don't think the guy is deserving of all this trash talk.
Posted by: Phillip | Nov 28, 2007 10:56:12 AM
Phillip, Perhaps you are right that the criticism of KF's looks may be out of bounds but the criticism of his past behaviour is directly relevant to his being deemed someone "influential". Therefore: KF left his girlfriend who was PREGNANT WITH HIS SECOND CHILD, that he had failed to support financially and otherwise--according to court records--to latch on to the meal ticket that was BS. Granted, he has few skills or talents that would earn him as much as his facility in getting his girlfriends pregnant. He is a high school dropout who has spent the majority of his life in a stoned out fog. His closest buddy and role model was a similar loser tagged "weedman". KF is simply a pothead, who stumbled unto a way to take money earned by other people. Although it appears that he has recently emerged as the relatively more responsible parent, that does not erase his history of repeated irresponsibilities. He'll have to do much more than he has--motivated as it is by access to child support money from his ex--to prove to the court that he is capable of being trusted with his own children without outside supervision. One must earn a break; however, you appear to buy into KF's reasoning that he is somehow entitled to the benefit of the doubt despite his eggregious past.
Posted by: rudy | Nov 28, 2007 11:13:37 AM