09/03/2008
McCain's 'Thorough' Vetting of Sarah Palin Began Last Wednesday
Yesterday, at a campaign stop at Engine Company 56 of the Philadephia Fire Department, McCain talked up the campaign's research on Sarah Palin: "The vetting process was completely thorough, and I'm grateful for the results."
And WaPo's 'The Trail' adds: "His aides have said nothing has emerged in news reports about Palin that McCain and the campaign did not know before selecting her, including that her 17-year-old daughter Bristol was pregnant."
Which isn't false, however:
Today, the WaPo reports: "Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was not subjected to a lengthy in-person background interview with the head of Sen. John McCain's vice presidential vetting team until last Wednesday in Arizona, the day before McCain asked her to be his running mate, and she did not disclose the fact that her 17-year-old daughter was pregnant until that meeting, two knowledgeable McCain officials acknowledged Tuesday."
Sullivan notes: "If this is how John McCain picks the person who would replace him in an emergency, imagine how stable and rational a decision-maker he'd be in the White House."
Sphere: Related ContentPosted 9:50 AM EST by Andy in John McCain, News, Republican Party, Sarah Palin | Permalink
Like it?
Subscribe to FREE Towleroad daily headlines with our RSS feed!
RECENT STORIES:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
oh mary please, you fags are making much too much of all this... palin i'm sure would make a wonderful president... tho i can't always agree with her politics and i'm sure if i invited her to tea that my powers of persuasion and gay retorik would convince her to see things our way i've always said that if we ever had a woman president it would be along the lines of a maggie thatcher and la palin seems to fit the bill quite fine... i just don't see all this fuss about a pregnant daughter, etc... what on earth does that have to do with governing a nation anyway, it's private business... and people do change so let's see what happens... this election process is certainly turning out to be quite surprising and i'm sure more fun is on the way--- the american way!
Posted by: the queen | Sep 3, 2008 10:02:46 AM
It has nothing to do with the fact that her daughter is pregnant. It has *everything* to do with the fact that she is against teaching safe sex practices in school, and she slashed funding for teen moms. This whole story is example of the most delicious Schadenfreude. It exposes the ineffectiveness of Republican social thinking.
For some reason, you seem to think that because she's a woman, she might like you. If you want to bet on the chance that maybe she'll change, Queen, you go right ahead. Meanwhile, I'll stick with the candidate who doesn't hate me for who I am.
Posted by: Sami | Sep 3, 2008 10:26:15 AM
I don't understand (slightly off topic): we are against Mitt Romney's magical underwear, polygamy, and the Mormon Tabernacle Choir, but ok with Sarah Palin's (member of a Pentecostal church - or possibly a former member) speaking in tongues, holy rolling, and (if she comes to Kentucky) snake handling??
Posted by: J.P. | Sep 3, 2008 10:35:42 AM
What is it with Republicans and their "vetting" process? You'd think they would have learned after the whole Bernie Kerik debacle. If they don't find all the skeletons some blogger is going to find them in shirt order. It actually makes me kind of happy that they are less able to get away with their nonsense with the entire blogosphere nipping at their heels.
Posted by: MT | Sep 3, 2008 10:47:37 AM
It's funny how the previous commentators all missed the important point of this article:
McCain waited 'til the day before he made up his mind (and subsequently announced it) about a running mate to actually interview her.
That's how much work he puts into each important decision, a few hours or thought and then he just makes up his mind with less than 24 hours of thinking.
"Oh, President McCain, should we attack Iran?"
"Let me get back to you in 5 hours on that. I'll go interview some Iranians."
Posted by: Philip Wester | Sep 3, 2008 10:58:42 AM
See this gem:
McCain did not speak face to face with Palin until Thursday morning, at his retreat in Sedona, Ariz. He also talked to her by telephone the previous Sunday.
Oh yeah, lenghty process, thourough intevestigation. He had less than one day to get to know her!
Posted by: Philip Wester | Sep 3, 2008 11:00:58 AM
Besides showing up the scary, risk-taking decision-making process of McCain, I think it also points out the ineptness of his staff.
When you have a crazy, impulsive boss, the staff really needs to have the facts and arguments all lined up and verified.
Is this how a President McCain would select a cabinet, judges, etc.?
Posted by: Chester | Sep 3, 2008 11:15:54 AM
Coming soon to a Dinner-Theater near you: Sarah Palin in "Moose Murders."
Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Sep 3, 2008 11:17:21 AM
When did this blog morph into such an over the top Obama Does gay = auto vote for Obama?? Still have freedom of choice, right?
Posted by: Ellis Williams | Sep 3, 2008 11:28:13 AM
I like Obama, I like Biden, I like McCain. I do not like Palin.
Being the Mayor of 9000 people and an uncontested gubernatorial candidate for 2 years does not, IMHO, qualify her to be 1 heartbeat away from being the leader of the most powerful nation in the free world. It has nothing to do with the fact she has tits and a vajay-jay.
As for her personal life; everything she has done, everything her family is, is what makes Sarah Palin. Look at "The Obama Story" we learned throughout the Democratic convention. It's the thread that makes up the fabric of the person. In the person of Sarah Palin, that's pretty fucked in the head fabric, and as with Obama, her personal life must be taken into consideration in the voting process.
I watched the Democrtatic convention, and was left with a sense that I could trust the two candidates for office. As I mentioned in the start, I really do like McCain, but good Lord... he needed a balance to his Maverick, not another maverick. The GOP ticket is nothing but reckless.
It's not gay support, look at where we are today, regardless of Bush and his christian base, gays are pushing forward. Yes, at times it is turning into a war, but we are gaining ground little by little. Obama does not equal gay rights, I feel he's going to toe the same line Clinton did in 1992. It will just be easier for us under Obama than under McCain.
When Mondale selected Ferraro, it was the female base that actually ripped her to shreds because she was not the right woman. Hillary had a shot at it, and had a good female base of supporters. Palin does not. As everyone has been stating, being female does not immediately make her the darling of the female voters. I look for her to get the same treatment that Ferarro got 20 some years ago.
Posted by: Rad | Sep 3, 2008 11:47:37 AM
I would assume his staff spoke to her/her staff before McCain did his interview... it is a little absurd to suggest that McCain himself do all of the investigation process prior to selecting a candidate.
Though he certainly should have spoken to her a bit more, yep, absolutely.
I'm still waiting to find an aspect about Palin that makes me respect her even a little bit in the position of one of the leaders of this country.
Posted by: lis | Sep 3, 2008 11:50:02 AM
Ellis-
It is starting to look that way (see banner at the top of the page), but this Palin thing is even stirring up oft-conservative news agencies. The phrase "questionable decision making ability" in regard to McCain makes me salivate with delight.
When it comes down to it, this is a blog. Even city newspapers endorse candidates, so I don't think the Obama focus is beyond legit blog reporting.
Posted by: scientitian | Sep 3, 2008 11:53:03 AM
Ellis Williams:
How much of this blog do you read? Do you read the stories about gay-bashing? Do you read the stories about initiatives for and against gay rights? Do you read the posts about religious organizations and persecution or acceptance of homosexuality? Did you read the post about the Republican platform with regards to homosexuality, gay marriage, etc.?
Given the choice between the two candidates and parties, and given this blog's focus and dedication to informing and championing with regards to gay rights, are you really surprised that Andy prefers Obama?
Posted by: JT | Sep 3, 2008 1:07:05 PM
One version of events has it that the McCain camp spent so much time wooing Lieberman that when he said no there wasn't much time left to find a replacement. They had already ruled out Romney and others who might upstage McCain.
AS has such a schoolboy crush in Obama it makes me ill. Why is he foisting his sexual fantasy life on us? This is one case where I would like to think it matters why you support a candidate. Sullivan's habit of post hoc rationalizations for everything is bad enough, but this makes his posts unreadable.
Posted by: anon | Sep 3, 2008 1:11:13 PM
McCain and his staff even LIED about the supposed vetting process. Rick Davis made the claim that the FBI had done background checks....the FBI yesterday that they had done no such thing and would not and never have done it for political campaigns.
It was so hasty and sloppy that they felt they had to blatenly lie to cover up old John's snap decision....
Good luck to us if he is elected with that kind of decision making.
Posted by: Michael | Sep 3, 2008 1:31:41 PM
Just a few points:
1) No matter how anyone tries to argue differently Palin still brings more executive experience than any of the other candidates.
2) Palin, with her governing experience, is candidate for the Republican's #2 position. Biden, who has the experience, outside of Obama's being a community organizer, is only in the Democrat's #2 position.
3) That Obama apparently believes gays aren't for some unexplained reason yet entitled to complete equal marriage rights should be more troubling to readers of this site than it appears to be.
4) Obama has yet to offer a means to raise the funds for his energy plan.
5) While Palin's husband was ticketed for a DWI Obama was using cocaine.
6) Where is this nebulous "change" Obama speaks so eloquently about? He isn't a Washington outsider, he's a product of the Chicago Democratic machine. He certainly isn't running as an Independent is he?
7) He and his organization used common political tactics to smear a well respected, sitting, Black, female opponent from even having the opportunity to run against him in Chicago.
8) If it weren't for Emil Jones,the Illinois senate President, Obama would have even fewer credentials as an effective legislator.
9) Goldman Sachs, Lehmen Bros.,J.P. Morgan, Citigroup are all involved in oil price speculation, all are special interest groups and all heavily funded the Obama campaign. No matter which party affiliation, special interest groups want payback.
10) Obama derided Edwards for accepting the Service Employees International Union donation but then accepted their $1.4 million contribution to his campaign.
11) Obama co-authored a tax credit bill for developers such as his pal Rezko. Who's going to profit from his Affordable Housing Trust Fund, more developers.
...I'm just saying...I've always believed the adage that if something looks too good to be true then it probably is.
Posted by: Morgan | Sep 3, 2008 1:32:42 PM
MORGAN:
This touting of Palin's having more executive experience has got to stop. First, because executive experience is not the be-all and end-all. Second, because executive experience, say, as a mayor of a town of less than 9000 isn't so impressive on a scale, particularly when one leaves the town millions of dollars in the red as a result.
Regarding the rest, As RAD above put it:
*As for her personal life; everything she has done, everything her family is, is what makes Sarah Palin. Look at "The Obama Story" we learned throughout the Democratic convention. It's the thread that makes up the fabric of the person. In the person of Sarah Palin, that's pretty fucked in the head fabric, and as with Obama, her personal life must be taken into consideration in the voting process.
I watched the Democrtatic convention, and was left with a sense that I could trust the two candidates for office. As I mentioned in the start, I really do like McCain, but good Lord... he needed a balance to his Maverick, not another maverick. The GOP ticket is nothing but reckless.
It's not gay support, look at where we are today, regardless of Bush and his christian base, gays are pushing forward. Yes, at times it is turning into a war, but we are gaining ground little by little. Obama does not equal gay rights, I feel he's going to toe the same line Clinton did in 1992. It will just be easier for us under Obama than under McCain.*
Both sides are flawed. Both humans are flawed. The stances against gay rights and for conservatism and religious fundamentalism by one side, however, tips the scales for me. I don't like that, pragmatically, the most I can expect is to have an easier life. But I'll take an easier life over a harder one any day.
Posted by: JT | Sep 3, 2008 1:59:57 PM
Morgan:
Good try, Republican troll. You sghould also mention that Palin doesn't even think we deserve half of what Obama has publically advocated for LGBT. And consider the ethics investigation she is currently embroiled in. I swear, do you bitches really think we'll vote against our interests. Each time one of you trolls posts that Obama doesn't believe in marriage equality you beglect to mention that McCain/Palin don't even believe in our existence period.
Posted by: sugarrhill | Sep 3, 2008 2:02:34 PM
Way to go Sugarhill,
At least he mentioned something supportive about us in his acceptance speech, as did Ted Kennedy and Al Gore.....the Republicans will just bring out the hate again.
And Morgan, anything positive to say about McCain? you know him ? the head of that ticket?
Bottom line is that Palin's selection was rushed and botched. And try for some new anti Obama talking points, those didnt work during the primary campaign, they wont work now either.
Posted by: Michael | Sep 3, 2008 2:14:43 PM
My Oh My! I just love that wonderful pic of Miss Sarah and her daughter sharing a wonderful moment of bonding over the carcass of the elk that Miss Sarah (I assume) just killed. You've just got to love those Republicon Family Values! Yes, teach your children well, Miss Sarah honey! Teach them to kill (animals are OK, of course, because, well, they're animals and Miss Sarah believes that the Bible is the literal WOG and so she's got that dominion-thing going over all creatures great and small). Yes Oh Yes! I want a pistol-packin Mama in the Blair House (the Veep's crib) just one small heartbeat away from the presidency!
Posted by: mike | Sep 3, 2008 2:20:38 PM
My Oh My! I just love that wonderful pic of Miss Sarah and her daughter sharing a wonderful moment of bonding over the carcass of the elk that Miss Sarah (I assume) just killed. You've just got to love those Republicon Family Values! Yes, teach your children well, Miss Sarah honey! Teach them to kill (animals are OK, of course, because, well, they're animals and Miss Sarah believes that the Bible is the literal WOG and so she's got that dominion-thing going over all creatures great and small). Yes Oh Yes! I want a pistol-packin Mama in the Blair House (the Veep's crib) just one small heartbeat away from the presidency!
Posted by: mike | Sep 3, 2008 2:21:17 PM
Why miss Sarah could provide the meat at the NRA hosted shotgun wedding. What are the youngins waiting for?the baby to drop or high school graduation?
Posted by: rocket | Sep 3, 2008 7:01:44 PM
First you kill an elk, then you move up to killing souls.
Posted by: Rocket | Sep 3, 2008 7:04:33 PM
JT, you're the only responder that seems to show more than a simple amount of intelligence. I appreciate that.
But I still see no rebuttal to most of the points I presented. Besides your post I read more of the same knee jerk reaction to anyone gay that seems to look beyond this tunnel vision view of Obama. Does no one on here admit the man, the ticket, the party may have any kind of flaw?
The true die hard supporters of Obama won't be swayed but I hope my post makes a few of the undecided voters to think about a second look at him. That's all.
Again, as far as the Democratic candidate goes,I keep thinking if something seems to good to be true it usually is.
Posted by: Morgan | Sep 3, 2008 8:07:10 PM
Morgan:
No ones is claiming that the Obama/Biden ticket is flawless. However, it's the better ticket for the LGBT community hands down. The McCain/Palin ticket isn't even an option for us because they won't even let us on the train. You continue to use the same old Republican plays that Obama is "too good to be true." If you're waiting for the other show to drop I don't know what to tell you. Obviously, you'd rather be dragged by the McCain/Palin train than jump aboard the Obama/Biden train and that's scary.
Posted by: sugarrhill | Sep 3, 2008 8:55:06 PM