Chris Dodd has come out for full marriage equality. Dodd published an op-ed in the Meriden Record-Journal yesterday and on his blog, saying, "the fact that I was raised a certain way just isn’t a good enough reason to stand in the way of fairness anymore."
It never was, but at least he's realized it.
Here's what Dodd said during the Democratic primary in July 2007 at the YouTube debate.
"I'd simply ask the audience to ask themselves the question that [my wife] Jackie and I have asked: How would I want my two daughters treated if they grew up and had a different sexual orientation than their parents? Good jobs, equal opportunity, to be able to retire, to visit each other, to be with each other, as other people do. So I feel very strongly, if you ask yourself the question, "How would you like your children treated if they had a different sexual orientation than their parents?," the answer is yes. They ought to have that ability in civil unions. I don't go so far as to call for marriage. I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. But my state of Connecticut, the state of New Hampshire, have endorsed civil unions. I strongly support that. But I don't go so far as marriage."
Watch that video, AFTER THE JUMP...
In his op-ed yesterday, Dodd writes, "I believe that, when my daughters grow up, barriers to marriage equality for same-sex couples will seem as archaic, and as unfair, as the laws we once had against inter-racial marriage. And I want them to know that, even if he was a little late, their dad came down on the right side of history."
Read it, AFTER THE JUMP...
(via pam's house blend)
CHRIS DODD OP-ED on MARRIAGE EQUALITY
Public officials aren’t supposed to change their minds. But I firmly
believe that it’s important to keep learning. Last week, while I was in
Connecticut meeting with members of the gay and lesbian community from
across the state, I had the opportunity to tell them what I’ve learned
about marriage, and about equality.
While I’ve long been for extending every benefit of marriage to
same-sex couples, I have in the past drawn a distinction between a
marriage-like status (“civil unions”) and full marriage rights.
The reason was simple: I was raised to believe that marriage is
between a man and a woman. And as many other Americans have realized as
they’ve struggled to reconcile the principle of fairness with the
lessons they learned early in life, that’s not an easy thing to
But the fact that I was raised a certain way just isn’t a good enough reason to stand in the way of fairness anymore.
The Connecticut Supreme Court, of course, has ruled that such a
distinction holds no merit under the law. And the Court is right.
I believe that effective leaders must be able and willing to grow
and change over their service. I certainly have during mine – and so
has the world. Thirty-five years ago, who could have imagined that we’d
have an African-American President of the United States?
My young daughters are growing up in a different reality than I did.
Our family knows many same-sex couples – our neighbors in Connecticut,
members of my staff, parents of their schoolmates. Some are now married
because the Connecticut Supreme Court and our state legislature have
made same-sex marriage legal in our state.
But to my daughters, these couples are married simply because they
love each other and want to build a life together. That’s what we’ve
taught them. The things that make those families different from their
own pale in comparison to the commitments that bind those couples
And, really, that’s what marriage should be. It’s about rights and responsibilities and, most of all, love.
I believe that, when my daughters grow up, barriers to marriage
equality for same-sex couples will seem as archaic, and as unfair, as
the laws we once had against inter-racial marriage.
And I want them to know that, even if he was a little late, their dad came down on the right side of history.
I have always been proud of my long record fighting for the civil
rights of the LGBT community. I’ve co-sponsored legislation to
strengthen hate crime laws and end discrimination in the workplace.
I’ve spoken out against “don’t ask, don’t tell” and always supported
equal rights for domestic partnerships.
But I am also proud to now count myself among the many elected
officials, advocates, and ordinary citizens who support full marriage
equality for same-sex couples.
I understand that even those who oppose discrimination might
continue to find it hard to re-think the definition of marriage they
grew up with. I know it was for me.
But many of the things we must do to make our union more perfect –
whether it’s fighting for decades to reform our health care system or
struggling with a difficult moral question – are hard. They take time.
And they require that, when you come to realize that something is
right, you be unafraid to stand up and say it.
That’s the only way our history will progress along that long arc towards justice.
DODD's STATEMENT at the JULY 2007 YOUTUBE DEBATE: