Comments

  1. reality bites says

    the NRSCC has already stated they will not fund O’donnel

    LOL, theyve given up that senate seat chance and r pissed as hell that she makes it 100% given that r’s do not take majority in the senate. They need 9 and claimed they could get 8-9 (unprecedented in 1 election) sans that seat they r projecting they can get 7-8 = no majority control of senate (still unprecendented change in 1 election.

    No matter what r’s will not take the senate now though i seriously doubt they will get more than 3 senate seats (the average per midterm)

    LOL

    her brand of crazy could play well in alaska or alabama but not in her state

  2. Andrew says

    Anyone else’s page plastered with O’Donnell’s Ads yesterday telling me to vote? I don’t know why it would think that ad would be relevant to me on a gay blog, but whatever. Just thought it was ironic!

  3. Bob R says

    I don’t know whether it is post Bush/Cheney withdrawal lunacy, or a severe case of Obama Derangement Syndrome, but it certainly seems that a significant portion of the United States has gone stark raving mad. Irrational, terrified mouth foaming, eye popping, verbally incoherent lunatics arming themselves and gathering in large numbers spurred on by greedy, wicked power mad demagogues seeking fame and fortune. I’m beginning to think the Mayan’s just may be right about 2012 being the end of the world.

  4. reality bites says

    bib r

    no

    o’donnel’s supporters r the republican base and former dixiecrats. They have always been here. They just now have a voice in mama pallin and the brown guy in the white house has them all stirred up

    They r a small minority. Heck THE NEWEST POLL OUT SHOWS 44%+ of the republican castle’s supporters/ voters refusing to vote for o’donnel

    pop ur popcorn and sit back and watch the civil war in the republican party

  5. CoMo'mo says

    At least she didn’t cite masturbation as the cause of blindness and insanity. Wait, maybe THAT explains the recent outbreak of goofiness passing for politics.

  6. toobored54 says

    So let me understand this. Maddow stuffs her face in between another womans legs, and that’s accepted as the norm, and a woman that only wants to recieve pleasure from her husband is a nut job?? OK, got it!!

  7. Mark says

    “If he knows how to please himself, then why am I in the picture?”

    Yo Christine, so your “religion” is all about keeping your man ignorant and dependent?

    Good luck with that act.

  8. Alex Parrish says

    If she masturbated (well and often) she might not have become such a straight-laced reactionary. There is always something which drives people like her into the need to control others lives. TOOBORED54 wrote:

    “So let me understand this. Maddow stuffs her face in between another womans legs, and that’s accepted as the norm, and a woman that only wants to recieve pleasure from her husband is a nut job??”
    This is not a question of her desire for or fidelity to her mate; it is rather the question of whether she is free enough to follow her own biological imperative and psychologically capable of allowing herself sexual pleasure without feeling inappropriate guilt and then projecting that guilt onto others in an effort to control them. If she doesn’t want to masturbate, that’s fine — too bad for her, but OK with me. When she starts asserting that I shouldn’t either, then that’s really a problem. This is a sad, sad person.

Leave A Reply