We Can’t Wait: Is It Time for Obama to Sign an Executive Order on ENDA?

The Interview:

Why do we need an executive order? Mr. Almeida gives us the example of DynCorp, the 32nd largest federal contractor, which makes nearly all of its 2 billion in revenues from federal contracts.

[DynCorp] recently got in trouble for allowing a hostile work environment in which one employee was harassed and called “faggot,” “d**k-sucker,” and “queer” on a daily basis. DynCorp managers witnessed this harassment, and they did nothing to stop it. The company recently agreed to pay a six-figure settlement to close this one lawsuit, but they have not accepted real responsibility. They have still not revised their non-discrimination policy to include sexual orientation and gender identity. However, they now at least say they are considering it. To help them along in their thinking, Freedom to Work has teamed up with Change.org to create this online petition found here: http://www.change.org/petitions/dyncorp-international-stop-discrimination-against-lgbt-employees

I encourage all readers to consider signing the petition. 

The next thing most people want to know is how would an ENDA executive order actually work? Mr. Almeida explains:

Let’s say a federal contractor in Texas or Florida fires an employee with a perfect performance record as soon as he comes out of the closet as gay. Under current law, that fired employee can’t file a complaint with any state agency, because neither Texas nor Florida has its own ENDA. He can’t file a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission because Congress has not yet passed the federal ENDA. 

However, after President Obama signs the ENDA Executive Order, the fired gay worker will be able to file a complaint with a the civil rights office at the U.S. Department of Labor. The Labor Department has 800 inspectors across the country that deal specifically with discrimination complaints against federal contractors. After an investigation, the Labor Department can litigate against the discriminatory company and win back-wages and reinstatement for the fired worker. So this ENDA Executive Order will provide real change for actual LGBT individuals who otherwise would have been denied justice.

How much real change? Mr. Almeida explains again, citing research from the well-regarded Williams Institute at UCLA:

After President Obama signs the order, in the next contract renewal each company will be required to add sexual orientation and gender identity to its non-discrimination policy if it has not already done so. For the top five federal contractors — Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, and General Dynamics, which receive about 25 percent of all federal contracting dollars – this will not require any changes whatsoever because each one of them already has a non-discrimination policy that includes sexual orientation and gender identity. 

It’s worth noting that many of these big military contractors have publicly stated that they banned LGBT discrimination because it was bad for business.  These top companies have acknowledged that non-discrimination rules increase efficiency and the profitability of their operations. But further down the contractor rankings, some companies like DynCorp will have to improve their policies. According to research by the Williams Institute at UCLA Law School, this change will provide LGBT workplace protections for millions of jobs throughout the United States.

Whatever the exact number — researchers at the Williams Institute at UCLA Law School are currently analyzing just how many more millions of jobs will gain LGBT protections (expect a discussion of that research in a future post) — several millions is nothing to sneeze at, but it pales in comparison to the number of LGBT Americans in the workforce. How can we respond to the inevitable criticism from the President's impossible-to-satisfy critics on the left that this ENDA executive order does not go far enough? Mr. Almeida acknowledges that his goal at Freedom to Work is non-discrimination protection for everyone, but

the ENDA Executive Order is quite broad and will cover 22% of all jobs in the United States. This will be a huge accomplishment to add to the President’s record. I think President Obama has already accomplished more for LGBT civil rights than any prior president, and in fact, I think he’s done more than all of the other prior presidents combined. Looking forward, I also think that if President Obama wins a second term, he will be the one to finally sign ENDA into law. So we can think of his signature on the ENDA Executive Order this year as the down-payment on ENDA, and the rest will hopefully follow in a few years.

As we noted in our previous conversation on Towleroad last spring, there is a long history of executive orders in which past presidents made non-discrimination a condition of federal contracts in advance of Congress passing the federal statute that mandates that for all employers.

The Analysis:

I think we can all accept that an ENDA executive order would, as a matter of policy, be a boon for the gay community: it may not be a perfect solution, but it will protect millions of workers and emphasize America's commitment to equality and the notion that you should never be fired for who you are. There are, however, two cautionary items to note.

First, executive orders can be rescinded by the executive. If a Republican wins the presidential election in 2012, he would have the power to rescind President Obama's ENDA executive order, as well as any other executive order — from the order banning torture to the one requiring partner visitation in hospitals that receive Medicaid funding. But, this is less a reason not to act than a reason to re-elect President Obama. After all, just because you're going to hop into your pajamas again tonight is no reason not to get dressed in the morning.

Second, wielding the executive order power does not strike us as very "progressive." Intellectual honesty is important, and many progressives — including then-candidate Obama – criticized the Bush Administration for creating an awesomely powerful executive branch with superpowers beyond the supposedly coequal branches of government. And, a strong executive has long been a pillar of modern conservatism. All true. But, President Obama spent more than enough time, energy, and wasted breath on a Congress dominated by conservatives in the House and paralyzed by conservatives in the Senate. Their constant obstructionism aimed at preventing President Obama from doing anything has perverted the constitutional balance of power to the point where it is almost as if Congress no longer exists. That may well be the conservatives' goal: an absent federal government can do no harm when you have no faith in the federal government. But, progressives believe in the transformative power of government and, as such, the executive should act where Congress should, but will not.

If President Obama signs an ENDA executive order — which I believe he will in the coming months — it will not only be yet another line on the long list of the President's pro-equality accomplishments, but it will be a lesson in the role of a national government. In a future column, I will discuss why federal action on ENDA the kind of action both liberals and conservatives should embrace as precisely the role of the federal government.


Ari Ezra Waldman is a 2002 graduate of Harvard College and a 2005 graduate of Harvard Law School. After practicing in New York for five years and clerking at a federal appellate court in Washington, D.C., Ari is now on the faculty at California Western School of Law in San Diego, California. His research focuses on gay rights and the First Amendment. Ari will be writing weekly posts on law and various LGBT issues.

Follow Ari on Twitter at @ariezrawaldman.


  1. Javier says

    The time for ENDA will be after this next election. Strategically it does not make sense to make any action on ENDA prior to the election results. It’s important to be patient and change will most likely follow.

  2. zeke says

    I have a question on non-discrimination policies. I recently worked for a small company (<200 people) that quietly removed sexual orientation from this non-discrimination policy (specifically their Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action policy). I asked our HR people why, and was told that they had to change the policy to match the federal language, which right now does no include sexual orientation. The company had offices in several states, and followed the state laws regarding non-discrimination. It wasn’t actually a problem – the company was progressive and offered same-sex benefits, so I saw them changing the policy as more unfortunate that threatening. I did a little research and found many large companies include sexual orientation in thier policies. My question: is a company required to write their policy a certain way, or can they realistically say they’ll prevent discrimination on any group they want? Is the Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action policy different from a non-discrimination policy?

  3. BABH says

    And protections for transfolk? The reason Barney Frank was unable to pass ENDA is because as a community, we Gays, Lesbians and Bisexuals decided not to throw Transfolk under the bus. ENDA could have passed if it had been “sexual orientation” only, but passing such a bill would have put off “and gender expression” indefinitely, perhaps forever.

    Happily, American companies are finding that non-discrimination policies are just good business. See here: http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/01/the-private-sector-and-gay-equality.html

  4. George M says

    I think it’s to much of a risk if a republican can and will reverse it. You know the sick f–ks will go after hospital visitation rights

  5. jack says

    ENDA can await Obama’s signature until after his reelection.Obama shouldn’t do anything to help his republican opponent get another wedge issue to use to stir up the crazies on the right. We on the left have gotten a great deal from this president, not everything we wanted but a lot. The single most important thing now is to get him reelected.The left had better get off their asses and help make this happen. I am old enough to remember when those on the left unhappy with liberal V P Humphrey because of his position on the vietnam war,sat on their asses and helped elect Nixon. Do we want to do that again?

  6. JP says

    @Zeke… I’m in HR… Companies can have any policy they want as long as it includes all the federally protected groups. They can add other protected groups to their policy like LBGT, if they choose. Many companies have done this.