Evan Wolfson | Gay Marriage | Ken Mehlman | Maryland | News

Maryland's Marriage Equality Measure, Once a Notable Omission, Shows Up on 'Freedom to Marry' Agenda

Yesterday, news spread of a fundraiser hosted by former RNC Chair Ken Mehlman and a celebrity-studded committee at Mehlman's Chelsea, NYC apartment for national marriage equality organization Freedom to Marry. The invitation, which you can look at AFTER THE JUMP, was posted by Chris Geidner at Buzzfeed.

WolfsonWhat was not noted by the Buzzfeed article was that, for the first time, Maryland is one of Freedom to Marry's beneficiaries and appears to now be on their agenda. That Maryland is back on the group's radar is good news, of course, showing that recent polls (showing a 53% approval, 38-39% opposition) have bolstered the confidence of advocacy groups and LGBT supporters that a marriage equality measure (along with perhaps several others) can succeed at the ballot.

Last March, the Washington Blade's Kevin Naff, in an article headlined "Freedom to Marry Abandons Maryland Fight", wrote:

Clearly, [founder and president Evan] Wolfson lacks confidence in the coalition, led by the Human Rights Campaign, and implies here that there isn’t “sufficient groundwork and investment” to preserve the law. The anti-gay National Organization for Marriage predictably pounced on Wolfson’s remarks as evidence that the law lacks support.

Naff noted that bloggers were expressing dismay about the group's non-inclusion of Maryland and lack of support for the North Carolina  campaign against Amendment One.

This morning, asked about the group's addition of Maryland to its agenda, Freedom to Marry's Evan Wolfson told me, "I have always believed we could win in Maryland, provided those in the lead there this round did the work and used the time effectively."

"Our drive and focus and hard work between March and now enabled Freedom to Marry first to raise and then invest more than $3 million so far in key battleground states," he added, "becoming the major national fundraiser for three of the campaigns (Maine, Washington, and Minnesota), even as we looked to others, notably HRC, to take the lead in Maryland.  Our focus and push has given those states unprecedented early money (the most valuable), enabling them to lock in TV air time before prices escalate, and otherwise make the case to voters."

Freedom to Marry's efforts have been focused strategically and incrementally, with the goal "of winning 1, then if doable 2, then if doable 3, etc," said Wolfson.

Finally, Wolfson laid out the group's plans for the remainder of the year:

"Building on the help we've quietly been providing Maryland all along, as well as our lead role on the three others, we again wanted to send a call to action that everyone should step up and do what we all can to win in all 4 states.  Having earlier this year worked to pave a pathway for the president, secure a freedom to marry plank in the Democratic platform, and launch Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry, overcoming the ballot-measure barrier is now our remaining 2012 top priority as we look to tee up a big 2013, with more states to win and the need to create a climate of empowerment as the Supreme Court potentially hears one or more marriage-related cases."

The invite for next month's fundraiser, AFTER THE JUMP...

FTM event

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. Basically Wolfson is saying: "So, now that the other groups have made Maryland into a potential winner, we're ready to help (take credit)".

    Posted by: Mike in Houston | Sep 21, 2012 10:38:02 AM

  2. Good for FTM. Leaving MD out was wrong. Although I was opposed to MD pushing for full marriage this year, and thought it would be better to use civil unions as a transitional bridge, once it was a done deal, FTM should have supported them. Also, since WA is well ahead of its fundraising targets, it made even less sense to cut out MD.

    NC was a different story. In that state, an actual win was really not in the cards and a major investment at most could have diminished the margin of defeat. I can understand their NC decision, but MD is winnable and it is good that they are now on board.

    Posted by: Dan | Sep 21, 2012 12:07:50 PM

  3. Let's also remind FTM that the votes in Washington, Maryland, and Maine and YES votes FOR same-sex marriage, and I think should be treated differently than "one man, one woman" referenda.

    Posted by: JFE | Sep 21, 2012 3:10:52 PM

Post a comment


« «Man Makes Anti-Gay Remarks, Slashes Victim with Razor Blade in Manhattan McDonald's« «