Denzel Washington | Film | Nathaniel Rogers

Movies: Denzel is High as a Kite in 'Flight'

Denzel loses control in FLIGHT



No one can fly a plane like Captain Whip (Denzel Washington). Unfortunately no one can drink like him either. Within the first fifteen or so minutes of Flight, the new drama from Robert Zemeckis (of Forrest Gump fame), Whip has already downed multiple vodkas, beers, and at least one line of coke. He's high before lift-off; this bender is all on the morning he's piloting 104 souls on a commercial aircraft to Atlanta.  

Whip gives drunk driving a whole new vertical meaning. 

Captain Whip's flight is, unfortunately, doomed. In the aftermath of the unusual crash (very well shot and edited -- a real armrest grabber and apparently it is possible to fly a plane inverted) Whip, his co-workers, multiple lawyers and moneyed executives are engaged in the very tense and very high-stakes legal battle as to the why the plane went down. 

"Why?" is an open ended question so let's ask a more specific one. Will Denzel win his sixth Oscar nomination?  



YES. (That was easy… even though the Best Actor race is hotly competitive) 

The flight that arguably gives the film its title is over well before the movie is but the showy physical disaster is only the layover. The flight's final destination/disaster is emotional. The title might well refer to this instead, booze and drugs being a popular method of escape. Whip is trouble and not just for himself. He manipulates, challenges and confuses everyone in his circle, a recovering addict named Nicole (Kelly Reilly), his lawyer (Don Cheadle), his union rep (Bruce Greenwood), his co-pilot (Brian Geraghty), and his friend and dealer (John Goodman in a crowd-pleasing turn that might have Oscar dreams of its own). All of these relationships and confrontations give Denzel plenty of room to fill in a superb characterization of an arrogant man and the maddening selfishness of addiction. Alcoholism is a tough subject to convey without stepping in piles of cliché -- it's hardly unfamiliar terrain for the movies. But even when Flight underlines a moment too boldly or presents it too simplistically, as in the epilogue, it will still ring true to those who've spent any time with alcoholic loved-ones. 


Director Robert Zemeckis has been away from live action cinema for over a decade now after pulling double duty in 2000 (Castaway, What Lies Beneath). He spent the last decade obsessing over motion capture animated features and Flight sometimes has a self-conscious naughtiness to it as if Zemeckis is overcompensating for his family friendly filmography. The  very first scene earns Flight its R rating for nudity and drug use and he doesn't stop there giving more time to Kelly's backstory ('ooh, look a porn set!') or grabby moments ('ha-ha, 'Jesus freaks!,' 'omg, it's Denzel's ass') than seem remotely necessary for the story Flight is telling.  

Thankfully Zemeckis's decade away from live action filmmaking has not dulled his instincts with movie stars. His filmography is chalk full of magnetic star turns from Kathleen Turner in Romancing the Stone (1984) all the way through to Tom Hanks in Castaway (2000). Flight is no exception. No one can fly a plane like Captain Whip and only a precious few movie stars can lift-off and keep a movie soaring as well as Denzel Washington.


Nathaniel Rogers would live in the movie theater but for the poor internet reception. He blogs daily at the Film Experience. Follow him on Twitter @nathanielr.

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. I hated it.The central character is a soulles creep and nothing Zemekis and the scriptwriter can do for him to "redeem himself" changes that.

    Phony "uplift" wrapped in an "Oscar-bait" performance of purest cardboard.

    They'll love it at "Promises."

    Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Nov 4, 2012 6:27:25 PM

  2. Also, the review doesn't even list Robert Zemekis best movies. He directed Forrest Gump and Back to the Future. Sure What Lies Beneath and Castaway were good too, but at least give some reference that every generation is going to relate to.

    Posted by: Richard Harney | Nov 4, 2012 6:44:53 PM

  3. "His filmography is chalk full of magnetic star turns..."

    ...CHOCK full...

    Posted by: Tatts | Nov 4, 2012 6:57:58 PM

  4. I wish I hadn't wasted my time seeing this movie. It was awful. 2.5 hours long, for WHAT? They could have trimmed a full hour from it and told the exact same story. Also could have removed the lead actress character and done nothing to the plot and had the same story. Maybe the intent was a promo for 12-step programs, but I truly didn't care if Denzel's character lived or died by the end of the movie, and yet it felt like the movie wanted me to care. Big fail.

    Posted by: Luke | Nov 4, 2012 7:40:02 PM

  5. This movie was a total snore. Denzel was great but there was no story, no change, very little conflict. Don't waste your time.

    Posted by: Sam | Nov 5, 2012 9:53:30 AM

Post a comment


« «Chris Kluwe Drops 'Pioneer Press' Over Anti-Gay Op-Ed« «