News | Science

BigGayDeal.com

Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg, Finally Answered: VIDEO

Chicken_egg

Think you know the answer? It's really not that simple. Check it out, AFTER THE JUMP...

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. At last, an answer! I love these guys!

    Posted by: Jack M | Jan 25, 2013 7:39:52 AM


  2. Well that made my head spin.

    Posted by: AngelaChanning | Jan 25, 2013 7:48:43 AM


  3. Oh brother. "Declaring themselves to be wise, they became fools."

    First off, no matter how much Evolutionists scream to the contrary they have NEVER EVER proven the evolution of SPECIES. No matter how many mutations a species may achieve over time, it is still the same species. A human will always give birth to a human and a chicken will always give birth to a chicken. Evolutionists don't like to point out the fact that all creatures have a DNA stablizer which PREVENTS massive mutation beyond a certain point. It is an impossibility for any mutation to continue perpetually into further generations - the DNA will cancel out the mutation. And that HAS been prove to be an absolute.

    I am just amazed out how people get hostile at the very simple idea that God created the chicken and gave it the abiity to give birth (lay an egg), but they so willingly accept the nonsensical and astoundingly complicated crap found in videos like this.

    Hey Andy Towle, you should be made aware that only a minority of gays and lesbians are godless. Vast hundreds of thousands of us very much believe in God, as can be attested to by the mutitudes of gay Christian & Jewish (and even Muslim) ministries around the world, such as GayChristianSurvivors, Metropolitan Community Churches, Cathedral of Hope, United Church of Christ, Bat-Kol, Aleph, The Aguda, Havruta - just to name a few. And there are scores of books, like HOMOSEXIANITY and GAY CHRISTIAN 101, written by conservative ministers who prive that the Bible is 100% pro-gay. We are the ones who didn't give up on God just because some straight people told us that God hates us. We don't judge God by what others say but by who He is - and He is love. He created us because He loves us and wants us. That is truth whether you want to accept it or not. No one can make the earth flat by believing it's flat, and no one can make God go away by believeing He isn't there. And He PROVES HIMSELf to those who seek Him.

    Not only does the Bible confirm that God made the chicken first and that all species reproduce only themselves, but that God NEVER spoke against gay marriage, and in fact Jesus spoke positively about homosexuals THREE TIMES. Stop listening to these homophobic religious theocrats who think they represent God and these crackpot Evolutionists who want you to believe that your great grandma was a monkey, and pick up a Bible for yourself and see that God is Truth and that He is NOT anti-gay and that He made you because He loves you and wants you.

    Posted by: Rev. Jim | Jan 25, 2013 8:08:46 AM


  4. Yikes, Rev.Jim, that was some pretty absolutist thinking going on there. Zero room for any other viewpoint much? No possible hybrid theory, like perhaps intelligent design that evolved on it's own after it was set in motion? Zero possibility that there was any inter-species action going on at some point?

    Nope, just your viewpoint and that's the one that's correct, nobody else is right.

    And you wonder why so many people avoid anything to do with religion. It's that "I'm right, everyone else is wrong" mind-tightly-closed thing that makes a lot of people steer clear of anything biblical.

    Posted by: johnny | Jan 25, 2013 8:31:16 AM


  5. This is stupid; everybody knows that the egg came first. The appetizer always comes before the main course.
    Sheesh!

    Posted by: Tatts | Jan 25, 2013 8:32:16 AM


  6. It wasn't the chicken or the egg - IT WAS THE ROOSTER!

    Posted by: Sean | Jan 25, 2013 9:39:44 AM


  7. Hey Rev. Jim - can you pipe down? Intelligent science-believing people are trying to have a conversation here....go play in the corner with your Noah's Ark Lego set & don't bother us, honey. Maybe if you're really good, your invisible sky daddy will give you the power to process complex ideas. (but don't count on it)

    Posted by: JSH | Jan 25, 2013 9:54:16 AM


  8. Newsflash for Rev. Jim: many God-fearing people (gay and straight) happen to accept evolution as part of the created order.

    Posted by: Lars | Jan 25, 2013 10:13:19 AM


  9. hey Rev. Jim: Gay liberal Christian here. I have a question. What name did Adam give to the T Rex ?? I attempt to take the part where Jesus tells us to love each other literally. The murky old Testament stuff may just turn out to be something like a parable...

    Posted by: Tom in long beach | Jan 25, 2013 10:14:05 AM


  10. Explained at last!

    Let's lighten up on Jim and just focus on the video, eh?

    Posted by: Doug | Jan 25, 2013 10:27:08 AM


  11. I love when dumb Christians pretend to know about science. We scientists will stick to the science, you can stick to the fairytales.

    /biochemist

    Posted by: matt | Jan 25, 2013 10:35:08 AM


  12. That video was nicely thorough. As to evolution, the issue isn't, as the video points out, a case of some sudden change. The issue is gradual change. Domestic chickens are not like their wild ancestors prior to domestication. They were selected over a long period of time by humans to produce lots of meat and eggs, and flightless helps too. If Rev. Jim's ideas about DNA were correct, it would be impossible for us to produce a domestic chicken different from their wild ancestors because DNA replication is perfect. This is false. Mutations are unavoidable. Even in a single individual, mutations cause cancer.

    It's important in any closed group for members to express some sort of allegiance or have their loyalty tested, but groups can make such tests conform to what we know about the natural world. It's the responsibility of group leaders, such as Rev. Jim to make loyalty oaths fair to the members and not demand that up be down or left be right, or have other insidious ramifications. Otherwise, the group is more cult than social organization and the members lose more than they gain by joining.

    Posted by: anon | Jan 25, 2013 10:49:19 AM


  13. Dear Rev. Jim- There's a hell of a lot more concrete evidence for evolution than there is for god. Words in a book are 'testimony' not 'evidence'.

    Go troll some place else.

    Posted by: jexer | Jan 25, 2013 10:53:24 AM


  14. We eat eggs for breakfast and chicken for dinner. The egg came first! Unless, of course, one works the night shift and sleeps all day. In that case, one eats dinner first and breakfast just before going to sleep. :-)

    Posted by: MIke | Jan 25, 2013 11:00:02 AM


  15. @Anon- it's pointless being rational with trolls like RevJim. They don't believe in DNA or physics. They believe that God pushes every atom in the universe around manually. They don't believe in cause & effect, they believe everything is a miracle that happens at God's whim and that he could change his mind at any second and reality would simply change to fit his plan without rhyme or reason. To biblical literalists... studying science is as pointless as studying a sand castle, the tide could re-arrange it completely at anytime invalidating anything you thought you knew.

    No... people that accept the bible as inerrant use a completely different vocabulary than the rest of us. To them, words like 'evidence' and 'natural' mean completely different things than they do when we use those words.

    There's just no getting through to them. I mean seriously, most of what they believe was written by 'anonymous', and attributed to God. Not what I would consider a credible source of information, and hearsay like that certainly wouldn't hold up as 'evidence' in court, much less scientific review.


    Posted by: jexer | Jan 25, 2013 11:17:40 AM


  16. Why did the chicken cross the basketball court?

    Because he hear the ref blew fouls.

    Posted by: Jack M | Jan 25, 2013 11:23:26 AM


  17. "Reverend Jim." That was honestly hysterical. As a (self-proclaimed, I'm assuming) reverend, you need to focus on doing good in this world. This doesn't concern you, and you're waaaay out of your league here.

    Posted by: Robert | Jan 25, 2013 12:04:35 PM


  18. I've always known this. It's pretty obvious.

    Eggs came before anything like a chicken, proto or otherwise. And anything that becomes a chicken has to come from a chicken egg.

    There's the whole thing, in two sentences.

    Posted by: SoSeriouslyY | Jan 25, 2013 12:07:26 PM


  19. existential crisis averted! wait! they're saying this all happened without a cock?

    i'm not buying it...

    Posted by: mike/ | Jan 25, 2013 12:39:46 PM


  20. @Rev. Jim. You like to refute 100s of thousands of science experiments that continue to point to proof of evolution. Yet you have 0 scientific data on creation and people are just supposed to believe you because you say so?

    Posted by: Richard Harney | Jan 25, 2013 12:40:22 PM


  21. Rev. Jim is obviously a cracked egg.

    Posted by: Bobby | Jan 25, 2013 1:10:34 PM


  22. for a belly-laugh, check out the link Rev. Jim provided!
    WHOOOOBOY!

    it reminds me of something else: demonic possession.

    know a surefire way to ensure you never get possessed by a demon or the devil?

    don't f***ing believe it's possible because the devil isn't frickin' real.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Jan 25, 2013 1:45:35 PM


  23. Wow, that Rev. Jim site is so much fun. web counter. it feels like 1997 all over again when we had these little gay pic libraries we could surf for free.

    Posted by: yadda yadda | Jan 26, 2013 9:31:38 AM


  24. Reverend Jim from Taxi?

    Posted by: Armando | Jan 26, 2013 10:52:19 AM


  25. Nothing wins me over faster than "This is the truth whether you like it or not".

    Posted by: Max | Jan 26, 2013 3:32:23 PM


  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «Towleroad Talking Points: Winter Sucks!« «