Allen Ginsburg | Daniel Radcliffe | News | Playing Gay

Daniel Radcliffe Discusses 'Kill Your Darlings', Gay Sex Scene: VIDEO

Beat_radcliffe

Daniel Radcliffe stopped by the Today show to discuss his upcoming role in Kill Your Darlings, in which he plays beat poet Allen Ginsberg. The film also features his first gay sex scene, and Radcliffe says he's "not surprised" that people are excited about it.

Says Radcliffe: ""I would be a very stupid person if I didn't expect some reaction to that...I don't really mind what reasons people go in to see the film if they're slightly salacious or whatever. Ultimately they're going to go in and see a really compelling drama."

Watch, AFTER THE JUMP...

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. I've said it before but Dan Radcliffe is a class act (and a good actor). Love him.

    Posted by: Strepsi | Sep 30, 2013 2:35:38 PM


  2. The majority of the gay community is sick and tired of people lumping them with child molesters. There's just one problem...

    Allen Ginsberg was a member of NAMBLA. He was very open about it.

    Daniel Radcliffe has never spoken about it.

    Come to think of it... Towleroad has never addressed this either.

    Gay people need to have a zero tolerance policy for NAMBLA and its members, not promote movies about them.

    Posted by: Come on guys! | Sep 30, 2013 2:40:35 PM


  3. @Come On Guys! Allen Ginsberg lived back in the day years ago when NAMBLA almost went unnoticed because of the very naïve, innocent times, and people had little or no understanding of this issue, unlike today.
    A fair number of activists, period, back then were also Communists because they were attracted to extreme beliefs in order to get their point across to a very slow-moving society.
    Don't toss out Ginsberg and others like him simply because they belonged to extremist groups. In a way they were simply Society's Child, a product of their time.
    Also, don't completely crucify someone simply because they were confused about themselves and certain issues many years. You can still find the talent and good in their life.

    Posted by: David From Canada | Sep 30, 2013 3:27:54 PM


  4. That Savannah is grating as an interview, with her fake enthusiasm. The set looks changed, but the artificial flowers remain. The orange couch is OUT, but I don't think they got the memo. Daniel was the only real thing.
    People who freak over NAMBLA deny a part of gay history. Send a comment about everything you do in bed, and we can see how that compares. Being afraid of NAMBLA doesn't make you any better than some small town bitty. Gay has a wide reach, if you are gay -- or just one of today's monogamous clones.

    Posted by: GB | Sep 30, 2013 3:44:08 PM


  5. I agree with David From Canada and GB: every one us reflects and inhabits the time we live in. Ginsberg's gifts as a poet are of greater significance than membership in NAMBLA, just as Harry Hay's approval of that organization is less important than his effective and practical opposition to the oppression of queer people. Broad and thoughtless condemnation of those associations is on a level with the comment I read once that categorized classic Greek methods of initiating young men into manhood as "child abuse". The NAMBLA members I've met have not been people I like but they are an embarrassing and disreputable part of our common lives and can't shut them out with sanctimonious ease.

    Posted by: gregorybrown | Sep 30, 2013 5:44:55 PM


  6. Getting back to DR: his frank approach to that non-issue is really refreshing. He's an actor: he acts and doesn't do all the whingeing and carrying on about how difficult and/or challenging it is to kiss another man or any of the other things that straight actors generally put into the "Icky" box. DR is either a decent man or he has a remarkably controlling and effective PR consultant, and I'll opt for the first part of that.

    Posted by: gregorybrown | Sep 30, 2013 6:01:51 PM


  7. Start making the world a safer place for children and stop making excuses for those who obviously want to harm them. NAMBLA exists solely for its members to abuse underage boys. Anyone who defends the organization or sympathizes with members past or present is delusional. Get over yourselves!

    Posted by: Come on guys! | Sep 30, 2013 6:29:00 PM


  8. COME ON GUYS! What are you on? Who is making excuses??? Can't you read?

    So if as a religious academic I am writing about Catholicism and the church; shall I ignore the child abuse that happens because I don't like it? Even though it is synonymous with the religion (young men recruited when they are young to join the priesthood etc)?

    Is that what you are saying? Because then you agree with all the Catholic church leaders who deny 100 years of child abuse in the catholic church. Great. I'll know to ignore anything you post from now on.

    Posted by: Rowan | Oct 1, 2013 9:01:41 AM


  9. @ Come on guys!: If you work hard enough and look deep enough, you can find a reason to say the same thing about ANY artist. So-and-so drank too much, or had affairs, or supported Hitler, or fought with his wife, or... None of that negates their importance or the importance of their work. Using that fact that an artist was flawed (which Ginsberg certainly was) as an excuse to expunge him from the historical record accomplishes what, exactly?

    Posted by: jomicur | Oct 1, 2013 11:25:14 AM


Post a comment







Trending


« «Egypt Extends Detention of Gay Filmmaker John Greyson and ER Doctor Tarek Loubani for Another 45 Days« «