Gay Marriage | News | Virginia

Snow Delays Virginia Hearing on Challenge to Gay Marriage Ban

The snow storm in the South has postponed the hearing scheduled for Thursday morning in Bostic v. Rainey, the challenge to Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage, AFER reports:

VirginiaOne of the most severe snow storms in a decade has swept through the South, dumping almost 10 inches of snow in southeast Virginia and creating dangerous conditions for an area that rarely sees such inclement precipitation.

Because of the weather, the federal district court announced that it will be closed tomorrow. AFER attorneys Ted Olson and David Boies were scheduled to appear before the court to argue that the state’s ban on marriage for gay and lesbian couples is unconstitutional.

No date has been set for a new hearing.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. Somehow, God was involved making his wishes clear, right?

    Posted by: JonnyNYNY2FLFL | Jan 29, 2014 6:19:49 PM


  2. @JONNYNYNY2FLFL

    If Pat Robertson hasn't already said that, I'm sure it's coming soon.

    Posted by: NotSafeForWork | Jan 29, 2014 7:09:24 PM


  3. @NotSafeForWork : If the religious nuts like the outcome it is "a message from God", and if they don't like the outcome it is "the work of the devil".

    Posted by: Bill | Jan 30, 2014 2:14:19 PM


  4. AFER's website has the transcript of oral arguments.

    As with all transcripts there are a handful of errors.

    "hassles muster" is the newest Band Name to come out of oral argument.

    Posted by: Randy | Feb 6, 2014 11:31:12 PM


  5. "sometimes you look at what you do and you ask why didn't I do it sooner"

    And with that, the Solicitor-General undermines his own request to stay the injunction.

    Posted by: Randy | Feb 6, 2014 11:39:03 PM


  6. "accidental marriage"

    Not a typo. The defence actually said that.
    Band Name #2.

    Posted by: Randy | Feb 6, 2014 11:56:19 PM


  7. "As it pertains to marriage the plaintiffs have brought forth no evidence whatsoever that there is a history of discrimination against gays and lesbians as pertains to the history of Virginia's marriage laws."

    Ponder, for a moment, the balls-to-brain ratio it must take to utter such a statement.

    Posted by: Randy | Feb 7, 2014 12:30:34 AM


  8. I particularly liked the Solicitor-General's rebuttal.

    He made a good case that same-sex marriage bans are discrimination based on gender, not just sexual orientation.

    And he made the obvious point that the Federal Marriage Amendment attempts a decade ago (plus Scalia's repeated dissents) demonstrate that people understand already that the US constitution protects gays' and lesbians' right to marry each other.

    Posted by: Randy | Feb 7, 2014 12:33:46 AM


Post a comment







Trending


« «News: Sean Hayes, Mars, Queen Latifah, Sochi, Abercrombie« «