Gay Marriage | Keith Ablow | Video

Fox's Keith Ablow Doesn't Understand Marriage Equality, Warns Of Man-On-Dog Marriage: VIDEO

Keith Ablow on California marriage law

Isn't this the very thing that led to Rick Santorum's "Google problem"?

Fox News talking head and quack psychiatrist Keith Ablow weighs in on California Governor Jerry Brown's decision to replace the terms "husband" and "wife" with "spouse" in the state's marriage laws, with the predictable level of absurd misinformation that even other Fox hosts have called him out for:

Here's the thing, the states need to get out of the marriage business. There's no way that the state of California can deny a marriage license to four spouses now. Eight spouses, or I would say three human spouses and the canine they absolutely love because if love is the foundation of marriage, they can love their dog, too.

Because in his diseased mind, equitable and reciprocated love between two sentient humans who happen to be the same gender engaging in a legal union that requires informed consent is the same thing as an orgy with a corgi - or "corgy", if you will.

You can watch Ablow make a fool of himself AFTER THE JUMP...

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments


  1. Give me A-Blow......children can be so very cruel.

    He must be scarred for life.

    LOL!

    Posted by: AllBeefPatty | Jul 12, 2014 8:58:00 AM


  2. i have orgies with corgis everyday thank you.

    Posted by: normadesmond | Jul 12, 2014 9:08:52 AM


  3. Here we go again:

    1) Someone create a website defining "Ablow" as having sex with a dog. Don't include anything that would cause Safe Search to exclude it from search results.
    2) Everyone Google the term "ablow".
    3) From the search results select the link to the sex-with-a-dog page from step 1.
    4) Google's algorithm causes that result to rise in the result ranking, so more people unwittingly select it, resulting in it rising even higher.
    5) Eventually it reaches the top, à la "Santorum".
    6) Fox pays-off Google to remove the page from results, but it's too late as the notoriety has already been achieved.

    Posted by: Hansel Currywurst | Jul 12, 2014 9:20:27 AM


  4. You can call yourselves whatever you want. Spouse is the generic, and you can do servant and master if you freaking want to - why are heterosexuals so dumb about practically everything? "Ow, new thinking hurts my head!"

    Posted by: Tigernan | Jul 12, 2014 9:26:06 AM


  5. You know the crazy's hit the fan when three of the crazier crazies cut you off mid-crazy.

    Posted by: jamal49 | Jul 12, 2014 9:26:29 AM


  6. If these conservatives are so worried about their interpretation of the foundation of marriage then why aren't they advocating to have divorce laws repealed? Oh, because if they can't get divorced that will affect them personally.

    These so-called pundits are selfish, self motivated, and stupid. If they truly cared about the "sanctity" of marriage then they would do everything in their power to prevent themselves and others from being able to dissolve a marriage.

    Their arguments against marriage equality are just a façade to express their hatred.

    Posted by: Will | Jul 12, 2014 9:55:00 AM


  7. Ahh....gotta love it. When religion tries to rear it's ugly head into secular government and get more than they bargained for. Yeah....I agree - religious marriage should have stayed out of government....but the Christians wanted it in. So now it gets reviewed through secular eyes.

    Posted by: Chrislam | Jul 12, 2014 10:28:41 AM


  8. "Spouse" has been a legal term for centuries.

    Gender-neutral to be sure, but perfectly valid nevertheless.

    Posted by: edude | Jul 12, 2014 10:35:49 AM


  9. Poor cons. Will they ever understand the concept of consent? Or are they all closet rapists and dog fuckers?

    Posted by: crashops | Jul 12, 2014 11:05:37 AM


  10. Poor cons. Will they ever understand the concept of consent? Or are they all closet rapists and dog fuckers?

    Posted by: crashops | Jul 12, 2014 11:05:37 AM


  11. Ablow is catering to the sub-80 IQ set here, and probably is fully aware that he's making it all up. Talking heads on TV are really just paid monkeys.

    Posted by: anon | Jul 12, 2014 11:24:43 AM


  12. I say we fill his email box with our stories of what his hate is trying to prevent - his email is info@keithablow.com

    Posted by: Tom B. | Jul 12, 2014 11:41:05 AM


  13. I may just be some socialist queer Canadian, but i'm pretty sure that even in the USA dogs can't sign a marriage license....

    Posted by: Little Kiwi | Jul 12, 2014 11:54:19 AM


  14. In following the "logic" of Mr. Ablow, in his way of thinking, maybe he can marry a tree to match his brainpower!

    Posted by: Bernie | Jul 12, 2014 11:58:39 AM


  15. whatever jurisdiction credentialed him really ought to review his license. In the case of a licensed professional, this isn't about free speech: this is about standards of professional practice; and saying things like this is flirting with malpractice.

    Posted by: Daniel Berry, NYC | Jul 12, 2014 12:15:53 PM


  16. The conservative canard about polygamy has been dismissed even by SC Justice Kennedy in last year's argument. He stated that polygamy creates issues of paternity, inheritance and tax laws in ways that same sex marriage between TWO people doesn't. There is no argument when comparing the two concepts. I WISH someone would shut these fuckers down in conversation when it comes up! NOBODY, even the Mormons, is asking for polygamy to make a legal return. I think they WANT someone to do it so they can say 'see, we knew this would happen!!' Arrghh!!

    Posted by: Princely | Jul 12, 2014 12:54:16 PM


  17. uhm

    marriage licenses are binding contracts = the state's not church's realm of interest and control

    the guy is an idiot with his schtick that the state should get out of the marriage business

    Posted by: Moz's | Jul 12, 2014 1:06:00 PM


  18. Does he not know the meaning of 'Informed Consent'?

    Posted by: JEFF YORK | Jul 12, 2014 2:38:50 PM


  19. Does this turd get paid for mouthing his stupidities ?

    'Oh what a world we live in'......eh, Rufus ?

    Posted by: JackFknTwist | Jul 12, 2014 2:42:07 PM


  20. Fox News: Where Old White People Don't Get It.

    Posted by: daws | Jul 12, 2014 7:21:17 PM


  21. He's right, you know.
    When women got the right to vote, dogs were lining up at voting booths with pencil-in-paw and asking for their own ballots.
    And when women were admitted into medical schools... Same thing. That's why so many dogs have become medical doctors.
    If two consenting adults can sign a contract regardless of their sex or race, then there is nothing to stop a dog from reading and signing the same contract... especially with all those lawyers of the canine variety out there.

    The same argument works for numbers. If one white man gets one vote and one black woman gets one vote that counts just as much as the white male's vote, then what's to stop a person from demanding TWELVE votes? We must stop black females from voting so that individuals won't be allowed multiple votes, because if we allow ANYTHING (like racial or gender equality), then we have to allow EVERYTHING (everything from changes in species and number to murder and mayhem.

    /sarcasm

    Posted by: GregV | Jul 12, 2014 8:44:29 PM


  22. He's right, you know.
    When women got the right to vote, dogs were lining up at voting booths with pencil-in-paw and asking for their own ballots.
    And when women were admitted into medical schools... Same thing. That's why so many dogs have become medical doctors.
    If two consenting adults can sign a contract regardless of their sex or race, then there is nothing to stop a dog from reading and signing the same contract... especially with all those lawyers of the canine variety out there.

    The same argument works for numbers. If one white man gets one vote and one black woman gets one vote that counts just as much as the white male's vote, then what's to stop a person from demanding TWELVE votes? We must stop black females from voting so that individuals won't be allowed multiple votes, because if we allow ANYTHING (like racial or gender equality), then we have to allow EVERYTHING (everything from changes in species and number to murder and mayhem.

    /sarcasm

    Posted by: GregV | Jul 12, 2014 8:44:29 PM


  23. He's right, you know.
    When women got the right to vote, dogs were lining up at voting booths with pencil-in-paw and asking for their own ballots.
    And when women were admitted into medical schools... Same thing. That's why so many dogs have become medical doctors.
    If two consenting adults can sign a contract regardless of their sex or race, then there is nothing to stop a dog from reading and signing the same contract... especially with all those lawyers of the canine variety out there.

    The same argument works for numbers. If one white man gets one vote and one black woman gets one vote that counts just as much as the white male's vote, then what's to stop a person from demanding TWELVE votes? We must stop black females from voting so that individuals won't be allowed multiple votes, because if we allow ANYTHING (like racial or gender equality), then we have to allow EVERYTHING (everything from changes in species and number to murder and mayhem.

    /sarcasm

    Posted by: GregV | Jul 12, 2014 8:44:29 PM


  24. He's right, you know.
    When women got the right to vote, dogs were lining up at voting booths with pencil-in-paw and asking for their own ballots.
    And when women were admitted into medical schools... Same thing. That's why so many dogs have become medical doctors.
    If two consenting adults can sign a contract regardless of their sex or race, then there is nothing to stop a dog from reading and signing the same contract... especially with all those lawyers of the canine variety out there.

    The same argument works for numbers. If one white man gets one vote and one black woman gets one vote that counts just as much as the white male's vote, then what's to stop a person from demanding TWELVE votes? We must stop black females from voting so that individuals won't be allowed multiple votes, because if we allow ANYTHING (like racial or gender equality), then we have to allow EVERYTHING (everything from changes in species and number to murder and mayhem.

    /sarcasm

    Posted by: GregV | Jul 12, 2014 8:44:29 PM


  25. He's right, you know.
    When women got the right to vote, dogs were lining up at voting booths with pencil-in-paw and asking for their own ballots.
    And when women were admitted into medical schools... Same thing. That's why so many dogs have become medical doctors.
    If two consenting adults can sign a contract regardless of their sex or race, then there is nothing to stop a dog from reading and signing the same contract... especially with all those lawyers of the canine variety out there.

    The same argument works for numbers. If one white man gets one vote and one black woman gets one vote that counts just as much as the white male's vote, then what's to stop a person from demanding TWELVE votes? We must stop black females from voting so that individuals won't be allowed multiple votes, because if we allow ANYTHING (like racial or gender equality), then we have to allow EVERYTHING (everything from changes in species and number to murder and mayhem.

    /sarcasm

    Posted by: GregV | Jul 12, 2014 8:44:29 PM


  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «Towleroad Guide to the Tube #1587« «