Abortion | News | Ohio

Anti-Abortion Activist Disgusted By Boobs, Calls To Ban Public Nudity

Doctor Patrick Johnson

Dr. Patrick Johnson of the anti-abortion group Personhood Ohio has had it with boobs. Dr. Johnson is "sick that women can legally bare their breasts to children and to married men against their will in Ohio," so he is calling for a statewide total ban on all forms of nudity. Yes this includes breastfeeding, despite the fact that the very babies his organization is ostensibly fighting to save need to be able to feed from a woman's breasts to live.

Somehow, freeing the ta-tas is also a show of support for gay pride, as Dr. Johnson claims on his Facebook page, "The gay pride parade in Columbus is 500,000 strong – why? Because the women go topless. This is the only one where I’ve seen this level of nudity."

It is presently legal for women to be topless in Ohio, and it is legal in all 50 states for women to breastfeed in public. Should Dr. Johnson move beyond complaining on Facebook, his version of a proposed nudity ban would conceivably run afoul of the 1st, 13th, and 14th Amendments.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. he would look great as a drag queen.

    Posted by: Max | Aug 19, 2014 8:19:59 AM


  2. Wasn't he one of the Doctors on Dr. Who?

    Posted by: Jack M | Aug 19, 2014 8:22:07 AM


  3. What a boob.

    Posted by: Bill | Aug 19, 2014 8:27:32 AM


  4. Very clearly deranged. Do other countries take these obvious lunatics seriously in their political arenas?

    Posted by: kit | Aug 19, 2014 8:27:32 AM


  5. Dr Patrick Johnson is partly correct. Women should not be allowed to show their secondary sexual characteristics (ie boobs) in public.

    Women get away with enough already.

    Posted by: petey | Aug 19, 2014 8:30:42 AM


  6. Simple solution for you, "Dr." Johnson: don't look at boobs!

    Posted by: HadenoughBS | Aug 19, 2014 8:36:57 AM


  7. Well, sweetie, just DON'T LOOK...perv.

    Posted by: aregeejay | Aug 19, 2014 8:40:54 AM


  8. Honestly it's like the sexual revolution never happended, oh but of course that's what these people want; to take us all back to some imagined past where sex=shame, come along now all back into the closet......

    Posted by: arch | Aug 19, 2014 8:55:25 AM


  9. petey: If you don't like, don't watch.

    I find americans obsession with women breast childish and pathetic. The Janet Jackson's incident was a laughing matter all over the world about how hypocrite prudes some people are

    Posted by: jjose712 | Aug 19, 2014 9:09:21 AM


  10. From the look of him, I'd anticipate that he wouldn't be comfortable with boobs in any setting, public or private.

    Posted by: The Milkman | Aug 19, 2014 9:10:15 AM


  11. Indeed, that was just what I was thinking--that he's grossed out by boobs because he has the gay. Probably walks with an audible swish as well.

    Posted by: kdknyc | Aug 19, 2014 9:13:46 AM


  12. If THAT ain't a case of 'gay-face', I don't know what is!

    Posted by: MikeKV | Aug 19, 2014 9:13:52 AM


  13. "Do other countries take these obvious lunatics seriously in their political arenas?"

    Yes... Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afganistan, Pakistan, etc.

    Posted by: crispy | Aug 19, 2014 9:18:26 AM


  14. Why the 13th Amendment?

    Posted by: WOLF | Aug 19, 2014 9:36:15 AM


  15. "gay face"

    Posted by: Truthiness | Aug 19, 2014 9:42:42 AM


  16. The picture says it all, he has a "wide stance". Only a matter of time before he is caught in an airport bathroom.

    Posted by: Bubba | Aug 19, 2014 9:44:00 AM


  17. Have you ever noticed that people that want to ban something probably battle their own inner demons? Can he not manage his own "desires" if he sees another woman's breasts?
    Truth be told, that pic makes my gaydar go off. That could be why he doesn't like seeing boobs.

    Posted by: Jere | Aug 19, 2014 10:06:53 AM


  18. More Gays with self hate....what is wrong with Gays today?..

    Posted by: rochon | Aug 19, 2014 10:11:23 AM


  19. I think the last time I saw a face like that was in an episode of "Hannibal".
    And please, people, do not tell these idiots to shut up. We need them to scream their views 24 hours a day. It's like when the Klan holds a protest rally: NOBODY wants to defend them, so let them march so that people can learn to hate them even more.
    Oh, and to paraphrase the famous line used by these bigots, "I don't hate the Christ, I just hate the Christians."

    Posted by: dommyluc | Aug 19, 2014 10:11:25 AM


  20. GO, BOOBIES!!!! So let's not only alienate gays and moderates and women, let's go after parents. On the Internet, everyone has an opinion.

    Posted by: Rad | Aug 19, 2014 10:23:44 AM


  21. does he not know what breasts are for?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNs26d6v-NA

    pretty much. right?

    he should avoid toronto. it's legal for women to be topless in public here.

    Posted by: Little Kiwi | Aug 19, 2014 11:15:39 AM


  22. btw - it's called "a child's right to be fed"

    Posted by: Little Kiwi | Aug 19, 2014 11:16:17 AM


  23. ROCHON/RICK: well aren't you the pot calling the kettle black?

    Posted by: UGH | Aug 19, 2014 12:01:45 PM


  24. OK, but who's the dyke in the photo?

    Posted by: JJ | Aug 19, 2014 12:03:38 PM


  25. He's just jealous because he was bottle-fed and because he doesn't have a big set of tatas himself that he can tie down and go to work with. He has also never touched his penis in his entire life.

    Posted by: BrokebackBob | Aug 19, 2014 12:20:14 PM


  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «What To Watch This Week on TV: A New 'Doctor;' Max Silvestri Serves Laughs On 'The Feed' - VIDEO« «