Anti-gay Colorado Baker Appeals Court Ruling Ordering Him to Serve Gays

Jack Phillips

Jack Phillips, with the help of conservative Christian legal defense organization, has appealed a recent court ruling against him for his refusal to serve a same-sex couple because of his religious beliefs. The judge had ruled that the Lakewood bakery owner “unlawfully discriminated against a gay couple by refusing to sell them a wedding cake” back in July. The AP reports:

Alliance Defending Freedom filed an appeal Monday on behalf of Masterpiece Cakeshop. A judge last month ordered the shop to stop discriminating against gay couples.

[…]

ADF attorney Kristen Waggoner says “forcing Americans to promote ideas against their will undermines our constitutionally protected freedom of expression.”

Phillips has pledged to close his cake shop if forced to bake a gay wedding cake. 

Comments

  1. Leroy Laflamme says

    Oh to be so highly principled as to not care about the cost of legal proceedings … when all he reallty needs to do is sell cakes to the gays out of a pass-thru round the back of the store. It worked well enough for their negro customers back in the day. Before the darn courts got involved.

  2. Adam says

    I don’t understand this. Once this guy’s intentions are known will any gays (or LGBT allies) actually be going to his store to get a cake? Furthermore, if you do patronize his store for a custom cake, aren’t you afraid he’s going to take a piss in the cake batter, or something else nefarious?

  3. Jim says

    Other than that he’s a sore loser, on what legal grounds is he appealing? You can’t just walk into appeals court and say that I don’t like the ruling I got and I want another one. You’ve got to prove that the lower court made a reversible error or that the law it applied is unconstitutional. Neither is the case. So what’s the basis of the appeal?

  4. Gregory In Seattle says

    Can you imagine the extreme public outrage if he was fighting to discriminate against doing cakes for an interracial wedding, or a Jewish wedding?

  5. Nick says

    SCOTUS just proved that you don’t need a reversible error or unconstitutionality to undo lower court decisions that expand the recognition of rights for gay people. See: Utah. Everything has changed now, and we also have retroactive laws now too.

  6. Jexer says

    quote: “forcing Americans to promote ideas against their will undermines our constitutionally protected freedom of expression.”

    … how the hell is baking a cake for someone “Promoting” them?

    Use a freaking dictionary.

  7. Zlick says

    ADAM, what about this is escaping your notice? This is NOT about him baking cakes for the homos; it’s about him obeying the law. I would never give this man a dime for his services, but I would still call the cops on him – and make an example of him – so that no one else buys from him and, especially, that no one else in his state thinks they can get away with this.

  8. says

    @Adam: Whether any gay people will frequent this guy’s shop knowing that he’s a bigot is beside the point. (Mostly likely they won’t, now that they know.) He’s the one appealing the ruling. He’s the one who wants a special pass to discriminate. He’s the one who’s dragging this case out with no rational grounds to do so. Alliance “Defending Freedom,” on the other hand, has every reason to drag it out for their own propaganda purposes.

    @Nick: Not sure what you’re talking about. SCOTUS hasn’t undone a lower court decision in Utah. They’ve issued a stay during the appeals process, which was disappointing but it’s quite different from overturning a ruling. Everything hasn’t changed.

  9. Shlomo says

    For Jewish couples there’s a special issue. If this person prevails on appeal (and perhaps even if he doesn’t), the recognized authorities could refuse to certify (as kosher) baker or caterer that does same gender weddings. This could include not just those weddings but the caterer’s or baker’s entire business. Even without an explicit threat, they might be rightfully wary.

    While I don’t observe the dietary laws (and would not consider marrying anybody that did), I would want to be able to serve kosher food if my “religious” relatives should accept the invitation.

  10. Jexer says

    @shlomo- That sounds utterly absurd. If a religious group refuses to condone a business because the business caters to people they don’t approve of… that’s their legal right, I suppose… but it’s a disgustingly political and corrupt thing to do none the less.

  11. anon says

    I’m assuming this falls under the civil code and he was made to “redress” the issue. It’s hard to appeal civil cases. If he could show that his wedding cakes are exclusively for one religion and not others he might win–otherwise he probably won’t.

  12. kdknyc says

    He’s not concerned about the cost of legal proceedings, as that christian group is funding the appeal–no doubt to crow about any victory they (most unlikely will) get.

    And, it gives the guy another 15 minutes…..

  13. Bob says

    DON’T FALL FOR THIS “CHRISTIAN” CRAP

    NO ONE CAN FORCE ANYONE TO BAKE A CAKE
    All he faces is a fine.
    This is the latest “anti-Gay trick”, to pretend they would have to do something against their beliefs.

  14. johnny says

    “forcing Americans to promote ideas against their will undermines our constitutionally protected freedom of expression.”

    Uhm, no.

    Baking a cake is not “promoting ideas”. It’s baking a friggin’ cake.

    He can go out and verbally promote all the bigoted ideas he wants all day long once the cake is done.

    So, shut yur cake hole and bake already.

    Otherwise, close the silly shop down.

  15. Scott Mcg says

    I have personally been to his shop and I don’t think he will have to worry about any other gay couple wanting any of his wares. As a bakery his work is mediocre at best, even customers before this said his stuff was dry as popcorn farts or tasteless just like the service there. He will scream as long as the ADF & Liberty U tell him to do so.

  16. Bill says

    @Jim : my guess is that the real grounds for an appeal is that he or someone supporting him was willing to pay the legal fees for an appeal. I’m sure his lawyer knows he will definitely lose the case, so from his standpoint, this is about billable hours and nothing else.

  17. woodroad34 says

    My mom, when I refused to wash dishes or make my bed, said if I didn’t do things I hated that were good for me, I would never grow up to be a man. She said I’d be pathetic and no one would like me. I see her point now. Thanks, Jack; I now know I never wanted to be your kind of childish fool.

  18. Shlomo says

    Jexer, you’re missing the point. I have no person interest in my wedding cake (or the other food served) being “kosher.”

    Also, I would not really expect any of my “religious” relatives to accept an invitation. However, on the off chance they do, I want to be able to serve kosher food.

  19. Jexer says

    @Shlomo – Sorry, I guess I did miss your point. It seemed you were suggesting that kosher ‘authorities’ would/could likely refuse to grant certification to businesses that don’t discriminate against gay couples. I’m sure I don’t understand more than a tiny fraction of what goes into passing ‘kosher’ requirements… but discriminating (or not) against certain customers seems like it shouldn’t have anything to do with it.

Leave A Reply