• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Travel
  • Sports
  • Law/Justice
  • Celebrities
  • Republicans
  • Madonna
  • Books
  • Men
  • Trans Rights
  • Royals
  • Monkeypox
  • John Waters believes mainstream Hollywood films are finally as shocking as his cult movies
  • Sir Elton John is ‘back home and in good health’ after being rushed to hospital
  • Robin Roberts Wedding—All the ‘I Do’ Details: The Dress, the Guest List, the Snubs and More Revealed

Ninth Circuit Says No to Prop 8 Videotape Release: An Analysis

Ari Ezra Waldman February 2, 2012

BY ARI EZRA WALDMAN

GuestbloggerToday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals declined to release Judge Vaughn Walker's videotapes of the Prop 8 trial. The panel's decision seemed to be determined by the fact that Judge Walker promised to keep the tapes under seal. We expected as much.

WalkerBut, that makes the opinion sound broader than it actually is. In fact, the opinion is so narrow, the panel was compelled to use the word "narrow" twice in one sentence. The court concluded that Judge James Ware "abused his discretion" when he ignored his predecessor's promises to keep the tapes under seal and ordered them released anyway, and because the Prop 8 Proponents "relied" on Judge Walker's promises, the tapes could not be released or it would damage the integrity of the judicial system. The opinion stays silent on the right of access to trial video recordings, silent on the possible equivalence of transcripts and videotape, and silent on who has the burden of proof. That is, my argument that the videotapes constitute transcript plus did not come into play.

Remarkably, the opinion is also silent on precisely how Protect Marriage relied on Judge Walker's promises. This omission makes me question an opinion that is otherwise right on the law.

In deciding that Judge Ware should never have ordered the tapes released in the first place, the Ninth Circuit assumed, but did not decide, that the "presumption of public access applies to the recording at issue here" (12). That is understandable: there was no need for the court to dive into the controversial morass of what technological development means for public access to the courts because even if a video and a transcript are equivalent,

[h]ad Chief Judge Ware properly understood Chief Judge Walker's statements as commitments to the parties, and had he recognized those commitments as binding obligations and constrains on his own discretion" – as he should have – "he could have arrived at only one conclusion that is logical, plausible, and consistent with the record: to preserve the integrity of the judicial system, the recording must remain under seal" (19).

In other words, the promise to keep the tapes secret outweighed whatever right the public had to those tapes. Again, this makes sense: no institution based on public trust can function if the promises of its leaders can be tossed aside willy nilly. The court then detailed precisely when and where Judge Walker promised to keep the tapes secret and chastised Judge Ware for "ambiguous" reasoning that seemed to ignore his predecessor's clear statements at trial and plain language in his opinion.

But, this was not the court's holding today. It wasn't just the promise; it was the Prop 8 Proponents' reliance on those promises that outweighed the public's presumed right of access to the tapes:

[T]here is a compelling reason in this case for overriding the common-law right [to public access]…. The reason is that Proponents relied on Chief Judge Walker's specific assurances–compelled by the Supreme Court's just-issued opinion–that the recording would not be broadcast to the public (13).

Exactly how the Proponents relied on the promise of secrecy is unclear. If that was the basis for the decision, it is insufficient for the court to list Judge Walker's promises. Rather, the court should have marshaled evidence of the ways in which Proponents changed their strategy given secrecy or would have changed their strategy if the tapes were to be public. That would show reliance.

Consider the parallel contracts context: What makes a unilateral promise enforceable is a party's reasonable reliance on the promise of another. If you promise to donate $10,000 as long as the money will be used to build a new classroom, and the school begins construction in reliance upon your promise, you cannot later withdraw the promise and donation (Allegheny College). Nor can you promise to rent commercial space, causing the lessor to terminate a prior contract with the old tenant, and then back off your promise to lease (Pop's Cones). And, you cannot take back your subcontracting bid after the general contractor has used it to calculate his costs and win a project (Drennan v. Star Paving, though this is just the majority rule).

In any event, a promise is binding in contract law because someone else relied on it, and to stop the promisor from backing out on the deal, the promisee has to prove that he reasonably relied on the promise somehow: by building something, paying something, exercising his effort somehow. Otherwise, the promise is irrelevant. So, if the analogy to contract law holds, what matters for determining whether to release the Prop 8 trial tapes is not simply Judge Walker's promise, but the ways in which the Prop 8 Proponents relied upon that promise. This kind of evidence is lacking in the Prop 8 case. Maybe the Proponents would have been less bigoted in the testimony had they known the tapes would be released; maybe they would have brought more/fewer witnesses. Regardless of what they would have done differently, the principle of reliance requires that they do something differently. 

The counterargument is clear: Proponents, like the public at large, always rely on the integrity of the judicial system by agreeing to be bound by it, by participating in it, and defending it from attack. A judge's promises, then, are always relied upon. I accept that possibility. But, the failure to show precisely how the Proponents relied on Judge Walker's promises strips the secrecy of any valid legal rationale. What's left is what we all know to be true — namely, that Proponents want to keep the trial tapes under wraps to keep sunshine away from their bigotry and hate. The law should not countenance that nefarious motive.

The 9th Circuit's ruling has been reposted, AFTER THE JUMP…

***

Ari Ezra Waldman is a 2002 graduate of Harvard College and a 2005 graduate of Harvard Law School. After practicing in New York for five years and clerking at a federal appellate court in Washington, D.C., Ari is now on the faculty at California Western School of Law in San Diego, California. His research focuses on gay rights and the First Amendment. Ari will be writing weekly posts on law and various LGBT issues.

Follow Ari on Twitter at @ariezrawaldman.

11-17255 #73 – Decision

Topics: News More Posts About: California, California, gay marriage, News, proposition 8

Related Posts
  • Former Roommate Indicted For Murder Of Florida LGBTQ Activist Jorge Diaz-Johnston, One of the Public Faces In State Fight For Marriage Equality
  • Disney Walkout: Employees, Allies Protest CEO’s Response To Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill; “Had They Said Something It Wouldn’t Have Passed.”
  • Russia Blocks Facebook, Accusing it of Restricting Access to Russian Media;
  • Sir Elton John is ‘back home and in good health’ after being rushed to hospital

    Sir Elton John is ‘back home and in good health’ after being rushed to hospital

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Sir Elton John is “back home and in good health” after being rushed to hospital. The 76-year-old pop icon suffered a fall at his French villa on Sunday (27.08.23) evening and …Read More »
  • Robin Roberts Wedding—All the ‘I Do’ Details: The Dress, the Guest List, the Snubs and More Revealed

    Robin Roberts Wedding—All the ‘I Do’ Details: The Dress, the Guest List, the Snubs and More Revealed

    Published by OK Magazine Here's to the newlyweds! On Friday, September 8, Good Morning America star Robin Roberts tied the knot with her girlfriend of 18 years, Amber Laign. The reporter broke the news on her …Read More »
  • Ellen DeGeneres announces TV return after 16-month absence

    Ellen DeGeneres announces TV return after 16-month absence

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Ellen DeGeneres has announced her return to TV. The 65-year-old star's eponymous ‘The Ellen DeGeneres Show' came to an end in May 2022 after 19 seasons and she's now revealed her …Read More »
  • Madonna ‘Would Love’ for Britney Spears to Come on Tour With Her After Recent Split From Sam Asghari

    Madonna ‘Would Love’ for Britney Spears to Come on Tour With Her After Recent Split From Sam Asghari

    Published by OK Magazine After Sam Asghari filed for divorce from Britney Spears, it seems like her good pal Madonna is hoping to help her out by bringing her on her Celebrations Tour once it resumes …Read More »
Previous Post: « News: Super Bowl, Jack Frew, Germany, Christine Quinn, Bjork
Next Post: Towleroad Guide to the Tube #1056 »

Primary Sidebar

Most Recent

  • John Waters believes mainstream Hollywood films are finally as shocking as his cult movies

    John Waters believes mainstream Hollywood films are finally as shocking as his cult movies

  • Sir Elton John is ‘back home and in good health’ after being rushed to hospital

    Sir Elton John is ‘back home and in good health’ after being rushed to hospital

  • Robin Roberts Wedding—All the ‘I Do’ Details: The Dress, the Guest List, the Snubs and More Revealed

    Robin Roberts Wedding—All the ‘I Do’ Details: The Dress, the Guest List, the Snubs and More Revealed

  • Ellen DeGeneres announces TV return after 16-month absence

    Ellen DeGeneres announces TV return after 16-month absence

  • Madonna ‘Would Love’ for Britney Spears to Come on Tour With Her After Recent Split From Sam Asghari

    Madonna ‘Would Love’ for Britney Spears to Come on Tour With Her After Recent Split From Sam Asghari

  • Lourdes Leon, Daughter Of Madonna, Shocks With See-Through String Dress At Victoria’s Secret Show

    Lourdes Leon, Daughter Of Madonna, Shocks With See-Through String Dress At Victoria’s Secret Show

  • Mike Pence Confronted by Emotional Mom of Trans Child About Laws to Protect Lgbtq Kids From Violence

    Mike Pence Confronted by Emotional Mom of Trans Child About Laws to Protect Lgbtq Kids From Violence

  • ‘This Was a Brand New Subject’: Donald Trump Grilled by Megyn Kelly About Supporting Trans Caitlyn Jenner in 2016

    ‘This Was a Brand New Subject’: Donald Trump Grilled by Megyn Kelly About Supporting Trans Caitlyn Jenner in 2016

Adjacent News

  • Did the UAE ban the Barbie movie? What about Saudi Arabia?

    Did the UAE ban the Barbie movie? What about Saudi Arabia?

  • From penal camp, dissident Navalny calls on Russians to resist Putin

    From penal camp, dissident Navalny calls on Russians to resist Putin

  • As contentious judicial ‘reform’ becomes law in Israel, Netanyahu cements his political legacy

    As contentious judicial ‘reform’ becomes law in Israel, Netanyahu cements his political legacy

Good Trash: Going to Read It Somewhere, Y'know

  • Beyonce pays tribute to stabbed fan

    Beyonce pays tribute to stabbed fan

  • Dwight Howard’s Assault Accuser Submits Uber Receipt as Evidence in Court Battle With Ex-Lakers Star

    Dwight Howard’s Assault Accuser Submits Uber Receipt as Evidence in Court Battle With Ex-Lakers Star

  • After Bud Light, Ukraine ‘Scandals,’ Garth Brooks Surprises Again

    After Bud Light, Ukraine ‘Scandals,’ Garth Brooks Surprises Again

Partner Links

  • “Cassidy Hutchinson said that Rudy Giuliani groped her on January 6th” links
    Cassidy Hutchinson said that Rudy Giuliani groped her on January 6th. […]
  • Mail: Duchess Meghan’s ex-husband Trevor Engelson is happily remarried
    Considering how badly it could have gone, I actually think the […]
  • See trailer for Andrew Haigh highly-anticipated “All of Us Strangers” starring Andrew Scott & Paul Mescal
    One of the best movies I’ve ever seen at LA Outfest […]
  • Remains of the Day (09/21)
    NYP: Sounds like entrapment to me -- surprised he wasn't eaten aliveThe […]
  • OMG, *NSync break another record while appearing on HOT ONES
    5 guys and a 60 Wing MUKBANGGG!! *NSYNC is back, reunited […]

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd

About

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy
[towleroadmr] [towleroadtn]

Footer

Ptown Hacks 2018

Read

  • Travel
  • Film
  • Law – LGBT Rights
  • Columns
  • Specials

About

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Log in

×
×