Gay Marriage | News | Pennsylvania

State Senator Seeks Ban on Same-Sex Marriage in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania State Senator John Eichelberger is holding a news conference today to announce the introduction of a bill banning same-sex marriage there, the Philadelphia Inquirer reports:

Eichelberger "Similar measures in the last two sessions of the legislature have failed. Pennsylvania law defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. But Eichelberger and other proponents of the amendment say writing the ban into the constitution would prevent a judge from overturning the law. Opponents say the measure would enshrine discrimination into the constitution. Amending the constitution requires approval from both the House and Senate in two consecutive two-year sessions before the measure goes to voters for final approval in a statewide referendum."

The Philadelphia Daily News notes that the enviornment in PA makes it much less likely that marriage equality will make it there anytime soon: "...though pundits based here expect a day when gay marriage will gain approval in Pennsylvania - thanks to the overwhelming support for the practice among voters younger than 40 - they say that any real movement could be closer to a decade away because of the state's unique demographic factors. These experts note that Pennsylvania is still one of the three oldest states in the country, with disapproval of gay marriage still running high among seniors. The state is also heavily Catholic, they note, and home to other populations, including conservative religious sects in central Pennsylvania, as well as African-Americans here in Philadelphia, who trend toward higher gay-marriage-disapproval ratings."

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. One thing we know is that Eichelberger can count on Barack "God is in the mix!" Obama for support.

    Posted by: JohnInManhattan | May 19, 2009 9:45:28 AM

  2. I am amazed at how many people are willing to write discrimination into our laws. Substitute black, asian, hispanic, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, etc. for "gay" in these bans and there would be mobs in the street protesting.

    Posted by: shane | May 19, 2009 9:46:42 AM

  3. My understanding is that there is very little political will to push this kind of amendment through at this time in the Commonwealth. While Pennsylvania does have conservative portions, the legislature is not interested in rocking the boat on this one.

    Posted by: Ed | May 19, 2009 9:58:11 AM

  4. Great another GOP COUP over Gay Marriage! Christ don'tcha think there are more important issues faces PA?????

    Posted by: alex in boston | May 19, 2009 9:58:32 AM

  5. What is it about equality that scares these people so?

    Posted by: protogenes | May 19, 2009 9:58:34 AM

  6. Surpriiiiiise... more GOP narrow-mindedness springs to the fore! Come on PA, give this fool a political smack-down. Tell him you are not part of his cadre of haters. Remind him even more soundly, how these measures were TWICE before voted down. Slowly but surely we will weed out these naysayers and get the country solidly on the road to good progressive EQUALITY!

    Posted by: CK | May 19, 2009 10:04:30 AM

  7. Never mind equality, our mere existence is enough to send them into hysterics. Their goal is the complete annihilation of gay people. 0 recognition, 0 benefits, 0 respect, 0 dignity. In the face of all this sickening hatred we have a press secretary that avoids answering any gay-related questions and a President that claims "God is the mix!" as an excuse for his bigotry and opposition to marriage equality.

    I know, I know, at least its not Palin, but its outrageous nonetheless.

    Posted by: JohnInManhattan | May 19, 2009 10:06:38 AM

  8. Good luck, you desperate assface and publicity hound!

    Posted by: Paul R | May 19, 2009 10:09:49 AM

  9. I'm confused, just because something's written into the constitution, it's automatically above any, and every, thing? And a judge, a co-branch of government, is refrained from doing anything about it? I was under the impression that something written into a constitution at a later time could be still be ruled "unconstitutional".

    Posted by: woodroad34 | May 19, 2009 11:50:19 AM

  10. What an asshole! just when I was getting ready to go to Manhunt's "Single's Week" in Puerto Vallarta to find myself a husband, This guy is trying to ruin my marriage plans! Let's bring him down!!!

    Posted by: beachstud69 | May 19, 2009 11:51:34 AM

  11. Two words: GAY FACE.
    (I'm on to you Mr. Senator)

    Posted by: Chris | May 19, 2009 12:22:15 PM

  12. anyone out there with ANY info on this asshole Eichelberger....Come forward...anything! This asshole will NOT get away with trying to turn Pa. into a hateful bigoted state! As a lifelong Philadelphia..I'll fight it tooth and nail!

    Posted by: Disgusted American | May 19, 2009 12:27:42 PM

  13. Fortunately, the Dems control the State House (by 1 vote) and Rendell is Governor, so this bill is going nowhere in 2009; now for 2010, I worry.

    Posted by: Jeff | May 19, 2009 1:05:29 PM

  14. I live in PA also. There aren't the votes to pass this bill but they will keep trying. It's frustrating the amount of money that has to be spent each time these brainless tools bring this issue up.

    Posted by: John | May 19, 2009 1:14:22 PM

  15. Just wait long enough and Eichelberger will go by the same exit as Haggard! Why do these people not like equality for all, just for some? If you dont believe in same-sex marriage, dont marry a member of your same sex! its as easy as that. Do we think the GLBT movement is holding an involuntary draft to marry? People who say "I dont believe in same-sex marriage" just announces that they are not going to marry a person of the same sex. You are not being forced, you are not being asked to attend the ceremony, you are not required to purchase the couple a wedding gift... it has no bearing whatsoever on any one person who opposes same-sex marriage.

    Posted by: equality, schmquality! | May 19, 2009 4:04:10 PM

  16. There's a MANHUNT IN P.V.?

    Posted by: Derek Washington | May 19, 2009 7:57:03 PM

  17. So much for brotherly love...

    Posted by: Glenn | May 20, 2009 1:29:28 AM

Post a comment


« «Adam Lambert's Boyfriend Drake?« «