Census | Gay Marriage | News

BigGayDeal.com

Officials: 2010 Census Will 'Divorce' Married Gay Couples

The AP's Lisa Leff reports that officials at the  2010 Census are struggling to work out how to count married and unmarried same-sex couples when spousal rights for gay couples differ so widely from state to state:

Census "The U.S. Census Bureau is making an unprecedented effort to include same-sex couples in next year's national population count, but legally married gay couples won't show up as such in the official once-a-decade tally, bureau representatives said Thursday. Statistical problems related to the development of the 2010 census form and the evolving legal state of same-sex relationships led Census officials to conclude that trying to include married gay couples in the overall snapshot of household marital status could yield an inaccurate number, said Gary Gates, a University of California, Los Angeles demographer who has been advising the bureau on gay issues. Instead, same-sex married couples will be added into the category for unmarried partners, just as they were for the 2000 census. But in a marked policy departure, the agency plans to make the data on same-sex couples who described themselves as married available on a state-by-state basis. 'The Bureau has decided to give us the information, but be a little cautious,' Gates said. The decision to develop separate sets of numbers was a compromise position that was 'less about politics and more about accurate data,' he said."

They add: "...it's become clearer that a wildly inflated number could be produced if the number of heads of household who said they lived with another adult of the same sex, and described that person as a husband or wife, were only counted. Some couples in civil unions or domestic partnerships, or who live as spouses in states where gay couples have no spousal rights, have tended in past surveys to identify themselves as husbands or wives anyway, according to Gates."

Also: "Although the census has not attempted to count individuals who identify as gay, lesbian or transgender, they could be included in the next count or even future editions of the annual American Community Survey, Olsen said. The survey, which is much more detailed than the 10-question census form that will be mailed to every household in March, is designed to give state and local governments a snapshot of how their populations are changing. Olsen said gay leaders need to keep advocating if they want to be recognized."

Census bureau says 2020 count could include gays [ap]

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. This is a problem that could easily be solved by giving same-sex couples the freedom to marry across the country.

    Marriage equality is the simplest solution.

    Posted by: Michael Crawford | Oct 23, 2009 9:23:38 AM


  2. Every single committed gay couple should self-identify as married on the next census. They want us to stand up and be counted? It will be on our terms. They want their own definitions to apply and are freaked that we won't accept them, and hence will "ruin" their counting. The only head count the LGBT community should be interested in is one that shows just how many of us WOULD be married if we weren't discriminated against.

    Posted by: Christopher | Oct 23, 2009 11:13:36 AM


  3. Yes, the DOMA legal chaos is so helpful for the country. And aren't we a federal system and marriage a state issue? Why aren't the repugs fighting for states rights?

    Posted by: David R. | Oct 23, 2009 11:59:40 AM


  4. This is silly.

    In the states where there is gay marriage they should count the married couples and report that number.

    This is just politics and infighting at the Census.

    This is not a real problem - it is being created.

    Posted by: RJP3 | Oct 23, 2009 12:40:45 PM


  5. So what about states like California, where all out-of-state marriages are now recognized, but only straight marriages can be performed?

    Will the Census Bureau count them as "married" or "unmarried partners"?

    Posted by: Fix It Again Tony | Oct 23, 2009 12:49:48 PM


  6. I am legally married in California.

    I will fill out the census form as such.

    If the federal government changes that data, they are the ones guilty of attempting to defraud the census, not me.

    Posted by: Rob Roland | Oct 23, 2009 12:52:54 PM


  7. "Less about politics and more about accurate data", indeed. I was legally married in Canada. My state, New York, recognizes that marriage. Creating a new category is Census Bureau homophobia, preserving separate but equal even in states where efforts at real equality have been successful.

    Posted by: Don | Oct 23, 2009 1:55:03 PM


  8. I live in Canada and we have a census every five years. On out of four census forms is a detailed form which asks a whole lot of questions I don't think are anybodies business but mine.
    Five out of six census forms I have filled out in my life have been the detailed one and when I come to one of those questions which be used in the future to round up the Jews or which I think are none of the government's damn business, I lie. As far as they know, I worship Iluvitar (look up the Silmarillion), my race is human, my sexual preference is also human, and I make over $2 million/yr.
    I am not alone in this matter, Sobikor (Klingon) is the fastest growing religion in Canada.

    Posted by: Chris | Oct 23, 2009 2:27:50 PM


Post a comment









« «Update on Maine: NOM Sues Over Reporting Requirements« «