1. Derek M says

    I’ve been following this case as carefully as I can – and as far as my understanding of legalese can take me – but I’m left wondering: If Olson & Boies are successful, what will that mean? Will it simply overturn Prop 8 in California, or will it have an immediate federal consequence? (or perhaps something all together different?) Thanks to anyone who might help.

  2. spiderseye says

    from what I understand the crux of the case is more about equal protection than gay marriage rights, per se. The argument is that Prop 8 created four distinct classes of people, which plaintiffs claim is unconstitutional. If we win, it wouldn’t mean gay marriage legalized everywhere, even at the supreme court level. It would probably mean Prop 8 overturned on equal protection grounds and gays would once again be able to marry, as the state supreme court said we had the right to do the year before Prop 8. What is unique in CA is that we had the rights and they were taken away. Marriage was not defined as a man and a woman before we had the rights. 17,000 people got married and then the populace voted to take that right away. That’s why there are different classes of people under the law. It would be ironic if the ‘right’ ultimately brings down their own house of cards because of their tactics in CA. A defeat would have repercussions, but not overturn other state laws, unless they also took away an existing right and created different classes.

  3. Tyler says

    I disagree with spiderseye. That is certainly a facet of the case but it is the weakest argument they have. That argument leads to the absurd position that california’s system is illegal because it tried to proude gays equal rights, which is rather absurd. Unless a court was seeking desperately not to impose gay marriage on red states ruling on that reasoning wouldn’t make any sense.

    Most likely, if successful, Chief Judge Walker will strike down Prop 8 because it discriminates against gays. Since district court rulings are not precedential, this would apply only to California. When it went to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if they rule in our favor it would bring gay marriage to the whole west coast. If it went to the supreme court and they ruled in our favor it would go to the whole country. Of course the lower court decisions will be stayed pending appeal and since it’s likely to go to the supreme court it’s all somewhat moot.

  4. gayalltheway says

    “…that the defense (the folks who put Prop. 8 on the ballot) were left with only one argument: marriage has always been between a man and a woman so it should always be between a man and a woman.”

    Even this is a fallacy – it’s called appeal to tradition.

    So basically they have nothing.

  5. Strepsi says

    I love the last question.

    As to the first question, a list of the (over 1000?) benefits, recognitions, civil and legal rights gays are denied by not being able to claim the status “married” — if removed — would automatically reduce discrimination. That list I’m sure is already in evidence, and should be presented again.

  6. JoeyD says

    This is such an interesting case.
    I apologize in advance for jumping around and not being very legal-knowledgeable…I’m just throwing in my confused 2 cents.

    I haven’t been able to take myself away from it when I see it on a blog somewhere or whatever. Such an important situation our community is in here. This is going to be historic, and hopefully for the better…for us anyway. As much as I try to be passive about an opinion of who will prevail, I obviously root for our side, the right side…But I’m very excited to see the outcomes both here and at SCOTUS.

    It’s difficult for me to even consider speculating who will prevail in the end (we all know it’s going to SCOTUS). Gays and Lesbians wouldn’t be given the time of day by almost half of SCOTUS…so that tends to make me a bit pessimistic (sp?) about it there. But…speculation would just make the next 3++ years very, very stressful.

    I want to prevail as much as any Queer out there…but I think it’s important to remain passive about potential outcomes. We really don’t know where this country stands with us. It’s almost like we’re in the middle of a severe spousal dispute and we don’t have the upper hand. Not. Fun.

    This makes my head hurt.

    Although, I do LOVE reading intelligent commentors comments regarding this and potential directions this could go. It helps me see the potential outcomes clearer.

    Thanks Smart People! <3

  7. says

    “The court has reserved ruling on plaintiffs’ motion to exclude Mr Blankenhorn’s testimony.”

    All over the net people just mindlessly cut and paste this boilerplate but exactly where is this “Motion to Excluded”? It is not to be found?

  8. says

    Small business loans are still really hard for business borrowers to find, and this needs small business owners to consult the best way to offer with the problem. There are a number of reasons that a lot of of us would relatively take into consideration yet another tactic when confronted with possibilities which include firing your banker.

  9. says

    How is it look like…life underwater, these all creatures so fascinating. They life their own life, they senses are different. I would really like to dive with whales, only one time. It is my dream.

  10. says

    Thank you very much for posting and sharing this great article. It is so interesting. I want to know some other information about this site. So please give me this news quickly. I always will be aware of you.

  11. says

    Thanks for the great post here. It is really hard to define the line between aggresive and normal online advertising. Everyone is setting the line by himself. Just don’t piss people off. Thanks for the post one more time and keep it up in the future too!

  12. says

    going to say what everyone else has already said, but I do want to comment on your knowledge of the topic. Youre truly well-informed. I cant believe how much of this I just wasnt aware of. Thank you for bringing more information to this topic for me. Im truly

  13. says

    coming from on this issue. I’m glad that I had the fortune to stumble across your blog. It’s definitely an important issue that not enough people are talking about and I’m glad that I got the chance to see all the angles.

  14. says

    great author.I will ensure that I bookmark your blog and definitely will come back at some point. I want to encourage you to ultimately continue your great posts, have a nice weekend! I am satisfied

  15. says

    ! I like it a lot. You know exactly what you’re talking about, exactly where other people are coming from on this issue. I’m glad that I had the fortune to stumble across your blog. It’s definitely an important issue that not enough people are talking about and I’m glad that

Leave A Reply