Gay Marriage | Indiana | News | NOM

Watch: Lesbian Claims Assault by NOM Supporter at Indy Rally


A counter-protester at the National Organization for Marriage's rally in Indianapolis earlier this week says she was "hit in the stomach" by a NOM supporter.


This counter-protester, named Alice, says the pro-equality group there was very peaceful, which is a good thing, because some are saying that the only reason NOM is holding this tour, given its abysmal attendance, is to draw counter-protestors out so they can prove intimidation in their court battles.

HRC Back Story:

NOM isn’t touring the country to tout “traditional marriage.” What they’re really trying to do is attract counter-protesters, in hopes that those counter-protesters – fair-minded people who stand up for equality – will create scenes and be disruptive. They’re doing this so they can pepper ongoing lawsuits challenging public disclosure laws with made-up stories of harassment.

NOM and their allies suffered a tough loss last month when they argued in front of the U.S. Supreme Court that they didn’t have to follow public disclosure laws like everyone else. While rejecting NOM’s request to shield petition signatures on an anti-LGBT equality measure on the Washington state ballot, the Court did allow for re-evaluation in cases of clear intimidation or harassment. That’s where the Summer for Marriage tour comes in. Unable to face reality and admit defeat, NOM wants fair-minded people to harass and intimidate anti-equality protesters at these rallies so they can go back and ask a federal court if they can hide once again.

Said HRC's Fred Sainz: "Let’s add it all up: NOM and its allies are making a last-ditch legal stand in Washington and Maine that they should be specially entitled to hide their political activities, and they’re saying that harassment and intimidation should provide them this cover. At the same time, Brian Brown schedules a series of virtually unattended weekday afternoon events hoping for counter-protests that they can then use as evidence of harassment and intimidation. Why else would NOM execute such half-hearted non-events and then completely subjugate its so-called ‘pro-marriage’ message in favor of devoting its energies almost exclusively to condemning lawful protesters?"

Watch the NOM Tour Tracker with counter-protester Alice, AFTER THE JUMP...

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. Hey, as long as her view wasn't obscured...

    Posted by: Rebel | Jul 28, 2010 10:57:17 AM

  2. Technically raising a fist is assault, making physical contact is battery.

    Posted by: NoSleep4Sam | Jul 28, 2010 11:10:41 AM

  3. HRC back story makes no sense, except if their intent is to keep equality supporters quiet. The NOM tour is a genuine fiasco, they can't even get 20 people to show up in Indiana. But why is HRC wanting activists to sit quietly and not protest the Hate Bus? Maybe non-corporate queers are just too embarrassing for the DNC oops I mean HRC?

    Posted by: Alex | Jul 28, 2010 11:38:58 AM

  4. When NOM comes to Des Moines, IA on Sunday no one will be protesting them. One Iowa group is having a seperate ralley a few miles away. To me it looks like they are backing down from NOM.

    Posted by: Brian | Jul 28, 2010 11:52:34 AM

  5. @Brian: When NOM comes to Iowa you should protest them loud and clear. It is political cowardice to follow HRC's self-serving advice, they're just pissed they are no longer relevant to the movement. Contact for real political activism that isn't a rubber stamp for Fraudbama.

    Posted by: Alex | Jul 28, 2010 1:03:03 PM

  6. I don't buy her story. There were enough cameras around to catch this if it did happen.

    Posted by: Doug | Jul 28, 2010 2:17:37 PM

  7. Actually that back story makes a lot of sense. I'm not saying that it is what they are actually doing, but it would fit with what they have done/are doing so far. It isn't well organized at all and those "harassment stories" have been absolutely pitiful. "They were blocking our view," seriously? Pathetic.

    And HRC isn't saying "don't protest at all," they're just saying "don't pick fights in ways that allow them to non-pathetically vilify us" aka a peaceful protest. For example, the "you're blocking our view" or "you're drowning us out with your counter protest" are pathetic, while if an actual physical fight were to break out, that might not be good.

    Posted by: ravewulf | Jul 29, 2010 1:24:17 AM

  8. Alex "Fraudbama"?

    dumb faggot!

    Posted by: RED DEVIL | Jul 29, 2010 1:36:07 AM

Post a comment


« «Fight Back NY Takes on Anti-Gay Senator Ruben Diaz« «