Michelle Bachmann | Minneapolis

BigGayDeal.com

Michelle Bachmann Glitter-Bombed By Gay Rights Activist

Bachmann

It happened today as Bachmann was stepping off stage at the RightOnline conference in Minneapolis. Watch, AFTER THE JUMP.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. darn. i was hoping there'd be more glitter and that she'd choke on it.

    Posted by: EO | Jun 18, 2011 4:09:25 PM


  2. Did she run and hide in the bushes again? Like when a lesbian confronted her with serious question in the bathroom.

    Posted by: Joe | Jun 18, 2011 4:15:04 PM


  3. what?! did the glitter get stuck in the box or something? that could have been so much better. tisk.

    Posted by: Trey | Jun 18, 2011 4:19:08 PM


  4. Okay, we're going to have to start having serious glitter bomb classes for these people. Not one of these politicians has had a single flake of glitter land on them... glittering a table is no fun... get it in their hair and it's not coming out for weeks! Come on people, put some weight into it!

    Posted by: JonB | Jun 18, 2011 4:24:27 PM


  5. The guy who nailed Newt Gingrich did a much better job. Glitter Bomb 101: the glitter comes from above and lands on their hair.

    Posted by: Phil | Jun 18, 2011 4:34:34 PM


  6. and she is super crazy so she won't handle it well

    I'll bet she called home land security people

    Posted by: mstrozfckslv | Jun 18, 2011 4:45:55 PM


  7. Keep going! I love these glitter bombings! But try to get it on the target...

    Posted by: Andalusian Dog | Jun 18, 2011 4:49:48 PM


  8. too bad it wasn't a real bomb.

    Posted by: dh | Jun 18, 2011 5:02:33 PM


  9. @Joe you're confusing two different events. She hid in the bushes when the there was a LGBT rally in front of the state house (all she had to do was stand up and watch). When running from the restroom after a lesbian tried to talk to her, she was asking for the police.

    Posted by: Mike in the Tundra | Jun 18, 2011 5:13:04 PM


  10. That was more like a fairy dusting than a glitter bombing.

    Posted by: Maverick69 | Jun 18, 2011 5:13:34 PM


  11. @Mike In The Tundra
    Ah my bad, thanx for the clarification.

    Posted by: Joe | Jun 18, 2011 5:26:51 PM


  12. Half a handful of glitter? That barely made it to Michelle?

    This was a big FAIL. I'm not sure Michelle even noticed. She was too busy waving. It had no wit. I feel like glitter bombing the glitter "bomber".

    Posted by: will | Jun 18, 2011 5:31:32 PM


  13. her husband is the living glitter bomb!

    check out his youtube video.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU66lIHW1dU&feature=youtu.be

    he's all HI!GURL HI!

    a future "haggard" if I ever saw one.

    Posted by: Xopher | Jun 18, 2011 5:46:23 PM


  14. Will “glitter bombing” politicians do anything to advance the cause of equality? There is no question that attitudes in this country are changing. According to a CNN poll taken two months ago, 51% of respondents said that gay marriage should be recognized. Other recent polling supports this figure. Like it or not, equality is going to come through ballot initiatives and not through judicial action. Therefore, the way the GLBT community is viewed by independents and moderates (who more times than not swing elections) is going to be crucial in winning change. Public spectacles will do nothing to alter minds or swing voters who are not already solidified in their position.

    So go ahead and feel good every time someone gets glittered. But realize that actions can have unintended consequences.

    Posted by: CJ | Jun 18, 2011 5:54:02 PM


  15. Again...

    Wingnuts disrupt Nutroots = bad
    Moonbats disrupt Bachmann = good

    Got it.

    Although, it couldn't have happened to a nastier shrew. Maybe someone should throw condoms at her next.

    Actually, it wouldn't be such a bad idea to commission a mini-pride parade to follow her *everywhere* she goes in public. The media would eat it up.

    Posted by: Max | Jun 18, 2011 6:34:13 PM


  16. This is a pathetic trend that just looks silly. Nobody is going to change their opinion of anything based on some twit throwing glitter.

    Posted by: Craig | Jun 18, 2011 6:47:29 PM


  17. It will frighten her and make her more paranoid than she already is. people will see she can't cope. This is good

    Posted by: Stephen | Jun 18, 2011 8:18:53 PM


  18. I'm with CJ and Craig -- the glitter bombing trend seems misguided and quasi-violent to me. The targets have certainly all been worthy of protest, but what these actions leave us with is an awkward, ambiguous scene that doesn't help our cause any. If someone from their side pulled this stuff with us we would be FURIOUS. To me it feels like the "glitter-bombers" are just looking for attention.

    Posted by: Tim | Jun 18, 2011 8:26:30 PM


  19. A Claymore mine would be better.

    Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen | Jun 18, 2011 8:50:46 PM


  20. This needs to high tech. There are glitter guns available on Amazon.com for under $5

    Posted by: Ray T | Jun 18, 2011 9:16:57 PM


  21. Echo Tim.

    Posted by: Max | Jun 18, 2011 9:24:00 PM


  22. Next time glitter her closet queen husband.

    Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Jun 18, 2011 10:00:10 PM


  23. The glitter bombs need some freedom ring shrapnel.

    Posted by: Patrick | Jun 18, 2011 10:51:39 PM


  24. Craig is right: this does nothing to promote a cause. It may make you feel better but negates from the positive effects of ordinary sons/daughters/brothers/sister/etc coming our calmly and with dignity. Glitter is stupid.

    Posted by: 207guy | Jun 18, 2011 11:32:50 PM


  25. When deaiing with this woman glitter is not enough! I suggest Holy water - then stand back and watch here melt. Then we'd just have to watch out for her flying monkeys!

    Posted by: Paul | Jun 18, 2011 11:35:47 PM


  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «News: Ryan Gosling, HIV, Croatia, Mitt Romney « «