Gay Marriage | News | Pets

BigGayDeal.com
« New 'True Blood' Trailer Features a Hungry Russell Edgington: VIDEO | Main | Madonna Digs into Lady Gaga in 'MDNA' Tour Rehearsal Clip: VIDEOS »

05/29/2012

Dogs for Marriage Equality

Goldenretriever

(via imgur)

Posted May 29, 2012 at 6:49 AM EST by in Gay Marriage, News, Pets | Permalink

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. ***AFFECT

    Posted by: rob | May 29, 2012 6:51:31 AM


  2. Dogs don't know the difference between "effect" and "affect".

    Posted by: AdamK | May 29, 2012 6:56:56 AM


  3. Oh but it would! Don't you know that once we get same-sex marriage, man-dog marriage is next?! Seriously though, I love this pic. Made me literally LOL.

    Posted by: scollingsworth | May 29, 2012 7:01:49 AM


  4. oh, great the grammar nazis are now correcting dogs. how clever of you.

    Posted by: carl | May 29, 2012 7:08:26 AM


  5. Carl, if no one ever corrects them, how will they learn?

    Posted by: Tim NC | May 29, 2012 7:20:16 AM


  6. This is cute but silly and slightly hypocritical. I remember people attacking others who brought their dogs to Prop 8 rallies with messages tied on their dogs.

    Posted by: Mitchell | May 29, 2012 7:58:53 AM


  7. But if it becomes legal, someone will want to marry the dog next! Rick Santorum said so

    Posted by: Steve | May 29, 2012 8:34:23 AM


  8. If this dog can spell "marriage" correctly, he certainly can learn the difference between "effect" and "affect". Sadly, such grammatical ignorance cuts into his message. A full day out in the dog house for him!

    Posted by: mandrake | May 29, 2012 8:47:51 AM


  9. My border collie uses spell check.

    Posted by: Demian | May 29, 2012 8:57:46 AM


  10. What an adorable dog. I wish the message were actually clever though, instead of lame. Maybe - "Support marriage equality. The two husbands who take care of me need it and I need them. Love from.... (fido)"

    Posted by: UFFDA | May 29, 2012 9:01:51 AM


  11. I had to fight the cat. She wanted to be part of the grammar police, but I told her to let the dog be.

    Posted by: Mike in the Tundra | May 29, 2012 9:12:24 AM


  12. It's a slippery slope, people! Let them misspell "affect" and next they'll be writing "it's" for "its"!

    (Well okay, maybe they already do...)

    For the record, I'm on the side of those who take care with their grammar and their spelling.

    Posted by: tominsf | May 29, 2012 11:38:55 AM


  13. Uh... it's not a grammatical error...

    Posted by: BobN | May 29, 2012 12:09:48 PM


  14. @bobn uh...yes, it is technically a grammar or word usage error as opposed to a spelling error.

    Posted by: patronsaint | May 29, 2012 3:54:25 PM


  15. Damn autospell!

    Posted by: Beef and Fur | May 29, 2012 4:11:36 PM


  16. That dog is adorable! Can't spell for sh*t, but adorable, nonetheless.

    Posted by: peterparker | May 29, 2012 4:26:32 PM


  17. Deiman, my cats pointed out that using spell check would not have an effect on the sentence because effect was spelled correctly.

    Posted by: vanndean | May 29, 2012 6:07:59 PM


  18. Brain cannot change letters...grammatical error cannot be corrected by system tools...incompatible input value...OCD unit overheating! Gah! The stress caused by such things.

    Posted by: StrangeLoop | Jun 2, 2012 2:46:20 AM


Post a comment









« «New 'True Blood' Trailer Features a Hungry Russell Edgington: VIDEO« «