Comments

  1. HadenoughBS says

    One of the typical “twisted-tongue faces” of the modern GOP. Their constituents get what they deserve when voting these idiots into office.

  2. Talisman says

    1) Straight marriage already lead to polygamy.

    2) Show me a non-human that can consent, and I’ll show you a non-human that can get married.

    That is all.

  3. Jon says

    The Paul clan are illiterate fools who happen to live in ignorant areas of America where their lies and distortion of the facts were enough to get them elected to office.

  4. Bob R says

    Listen and look at Rand Paul. And Michelle Bachman and Louie Gohmert and Huelskamp and all the rest of the legitimate morons, idiots and buffoons the GOP not just attracts but encourages. Then imagine, if you can, what type of person would vote for any of them? What type of mouth breathing, knuckle dragging mental midgets are there in such great numbers that these cretins actually remain in office? What’s worse is why aren’t clowns ridiculed off the public stage by members of normal society?

  5. jamal49 says

    Considering that Rand Paul is about as non-human and twerpy as you can get, I am always amazed at how his ilk OBSESS about having sex with animals! Is there some kind of national registry for zoophiles? I mean, I wanna know anytime this man is in my neighborhood. I gotta look out for may cat, ya know?

  6. says

    “‘I think my point that I was trying to make is that government has been involved in marriage for a while and it’s been at the state level,’ Paul said.”

    Where does he think the 1000+ benefits of his marriage come from? Outer space? The Tea Party fairy? It’s the federal government, idiot. And if that was successful “sarcasm,” he has a flattering hairdo.

  7. Hank Plante says

    So many of these Tea Party libertarians are really just the same old extreme right- wingers in disguise. Being a conservative used to mean the government should stay out of your bedroom. That’s lost on today’s ayatollahs.

  8. JMC says

    Doesn’t he try to pass himself off as libertarian? How could he oppose DOMA being abolished and SCOTUS not interfering with Calfornia’a ruling on Prop 8? Aren’t these guys supposed to be all about small government and states rights?

  9. Zeta says

    @Talisman,
    1) Since it’s always been legal, why was polygamy deemed illegal in the first place?
    2) In the same way that animals can masturbate and engage in homosexual encounters, animals can consent.

    The real issue isn’t consent. It’s property laws.

  10. todd says

    By the way….on a serious note. Isn’t polygamy a driving force between a man and a woman in the bible? Seems to me there was a passage about marrying a thousand whores? So why aren’t the religious defenders defending it?

  11. Akula says

    So is Rand going to be introducing legislation allowing inanimate objects and non humans the ability to sign legally binding contracts? Because that’s the only way anyone is going to be able to marry a tree, dog, tea kettle, or the chair Clint Eastwood was chatting with. If he does please let me know I need to find a grove of trees to co-sign a big ass loan for me. one word IDIOT!

  12. Zeta says

    @Akula, which is it? Is marriage about love or about contracts?

    If it’s about love, then no one should tell someone they can’t marry the grove they’ve bonded with, they take of, they own, or which they are going to pledge to own and take care of.

    If it’s about contracts, then ditto.

    I don’t see the problem. Should homosexuals?

Leave A Reply