• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Travel
  • Sports
  • Law/Justice
  • Celebrities
  • Film/TV/Stream
  • Republicans
  • Madonna
  • Books
  • Men
  • Trans Rights
  • Tech/Science
  • Royals
  • Monkeypox
  • J&J to end global sales of talc-based baby powder
  • Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda slams unauthorised production
  • ‘It’s really irritating’: Madonna’s son David Banda wears her clothes ‘better’ than her

Nashville, Tennessee: Crazy Town or Crazy State?

Ari Ezra Waldman February 9, 2011

BY ARI EZRA WALDMAN

Ari Ezra Waldman is a 2002 graduate of Harvard College and a 2005 graduate of Harvard Law School. After practicing in New York for five years and clerking at a federal appellate court in Washington, D.C., Ari is now on the faculty at California Western School of Law in San Diego, California. His research focuses on gay rights and the First Amendment. Ari will be writing weekly posts on law and various LGBT issues. 

Follow Ari on Twitter at @ariezrawaldman.

Large_nashville_tn_local"Crazy Town" is a song about Nashville, Tennessee. It tells the story of how hard it is to make it in a town as crazy as Nashville, or, "Hollywood with a touch of twang." It may indeed be hard to make it in Nashville, but just last month, the Hollywood of the Bible Belt tried to make life a little easier for its LGBT residents. Its town council proposed legislation that would require city government contractors to abide by the city's non-discrimination policy, which includes protections for LGBT persons.

But, yesterday, Andy posted about another proposal out of Nashville — out of the state capitol building rather than city hall — wherein municipalities in the state would be prohibited from passing their own anti-discrimination laws and would instead have to rely on the state-wide statute. The bill limits the state's non-discrimination policy to "race, creed, color, religion, sex, age or national origin."

Once again, it's hard to make it in Nashville.

This story seems like it is about discrimination against gays and lesbians in government contracts and employment. After all, but for Nashville's decision to include LGBT Tennesseans in its non-discrimination policy, conservative members of the state legislature would never have proposed this legislation. It is actually much more. The proposed state law proposes to eliminate the municipality as a recourse for LGBT political activity to achieve equality. It would narrow their recourse to changing state law, something that seems far less likely given Tennessee's conservatism.

Let's set aside for the moment whether this bill is a good/bad idea. I would imagine that many readers feel this is a bad bill. I want to ask a different question: Is this constitutionally permissible?

Continue reading "Crazy Town or Crazy State" AFTER THE JUMP.

The Tennessee bill to prevent municipalities from adding sexual orientation (or any other new classification) to their anti-discrimination policies is, at its core, an attempt by the state legislature to take away from gays and lesbians the opportunity to use local politics to better their lot in life.

This should remind us of a parallel — though not identical — situation that happened in Colorado, and culminated in the landmark gay rights case, Romer v. Evans. At issue in Romer was the constitutionality of an amendment to the Colorado constitution (Amendment 2) that that would have prevented any city, town or county in the state from passing any law that would include gays and lesbians as a protected class. In other words, it prevented all levels of local and state government from passing anti-discrimination laws that included prohibitions on the basis of sexual orientation. Like the impetus for the Nashville bill, what inspired Amendment 2 was progressive local actions: Aspen, Boulder and the city and county of Denver enacted gay-inclusive anti-discrimination laws.

The Court decided that Amendment 2 was not rationally related to a legitimate government interest. It was, the Court found, based purely on animus toward gay people, which can never be a legitimate motive for any government action. But, the central problem was that it took away the political opportunities for gays and lesbians where everyone else had the right and ability to use their political muscle to get favorable legislation passed at the city, county and state level. Amendment 2 had the practical effect of allowing other interest groups to protect themselves through electing local, county and state representatives; lobbying local, county and state political bodies; and any other part of the political process. Instead, the only political option open to gays and lesbians was to get a 2/3 majority of the Colorado population to change the state constitution. Hardly an easy task, especially since the the citizen initiative process in Colorado is even harder than it is in California.

The Tennessee bill is less egregious and less restrictive than Amendment 2. The state political process is still available to gays and lesbians under the proposal, and no one says that gaining anti-discrimination protections from the state legislature has to be an easy task.

But, was it the severity of Amendment 2 that was the problem for the Court in Romer, i.e., what made it irrational to deny gays and lesbians all access to the political process was that denial of all access proved it was based on anti-gay animus? Or, was it the mere fact that the provision denied a group some access to the political process, no matter how severe, and imposed an extra burden on the political rights of one class that no other people had to bear, i.e., what made it irrational to deny gays and lesbians any access to the political process would not vary as the severity of the denial of rights changed?

The Court seems to switch back and forth. At times, the Court emphasizes that the effect of Amendment 2 was "[s]weeping and comprehensive." And, then, moments later, the Court reminds us that Amendment 2 was really about the fact of "withdraw[ing] from homosexuals, but no others, specific legal protection from the injuries caused by discrimination, and … forbid[ing] reinstatement of these laws and policies." Amendment 2 was both "far reaching" and "takes away certain rights" and only "imposes a special disability upon … [gays and lesbians] alone."

The question remains: Is the constitutional problem in Romer that a disability was imposed on gays and lesbians alone, suggesting that any similar disability need not be as severe as Romer to run afoul of the Federal constitution's Due Process Clause? Or, is the constitutional problem that creates a due process violation the fact that Amendment 2 was so sweeping and took away all political rights from gays and lesbians, suggesting that less severe versions of Amendment 2 would not trigger a due process violation?

In the end, Romer focuses on the severity of Amendment 2: "Amendment 2 fails… First, the amendment has the peculiar property of imposing a broad and undifferentiated disability on a single named group, an exceptional and, as we shall explain, invalid form of legislation. Second, its sheer breadth is so discontinuous with the reasons offered for it that the amendment seems inexplicable by anything but animus toward the class that it affects; it lacks a rational relationship to legitimate state interests." The broad denial of rights made Amendment 2 invalid; the breadth of its reach made it irrational.

But, the decision is replete with references to suggest that even though Amendment 2 was particularly egregious and broad, legislation that denies rights based purely on animus need not be so severe and broad to clash with Romer's core holding and with due process. So, a challenge to Tennessee's proposal may be harder, but Romer provides some ammunition to the cause.

Different states have different relationships with their municipalities; different state constitutions establish different levels of "home rule" for local governments. But, suffice it to say, the issue here (and in Romer) is more about denying particular communities access to certain parts of the political process than about big (or small) state government. But, the relationship between the state and local governments comes into play: If this is the only area in which the state has imposed on the home rule of its localities, it is more likely that the state's decision to do so is based on animus toward the one group to which it is denying rights and access. And, while Romer by no means closes the book on the constitutionality of Tennessee's bill — in fact, it just barely opens it! — the proposal implicates the same values and imposes similar forms of discrimination.

Topics: News More Posts About: Ari Ezra Waldman, Law - Gay, LGBT, Nashville, News, Tennessee

Related Posts
  • Louisiana bans transgender girls from girls’ sports teams
  • A New Olivia Records — Not the 1970’s Lesbian, Feminist Label, The 2020’s Feminist One — Launches With 2 Queer Artists; Challenges Country
  • Russia Blocks Facebook, Accusing it of Restricting Access to Russian Media;
  • Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda slams unauthorised production

    Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda slams unauthorised production

    Published by BANG Showbiz English ‘Hamilton’ creator Lin-Manuel Miranda is going to let the lawyers “do their work” over an allegedly unauthorised production of the show by a church in Texas. A production of the hit …Read More »
  • ‘It’s really irritating’: Madonna’s son David Banda wears her clothes ‘better’ than her

    ‘It’s really irritating’: Madonna’s son David Banda wears her clothes ‘better’ than her

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Madonna says her son David Banda looks better than her in his mother’s clothes. The Queen of Pop, 63, confessed that it’s “really irritating” that her 16-year-old son – whom she …Read More »
  • Analysis: U.S. move to negotiate drug prices a rare defeat for Big Pharma

    Analysis: U.S. move to negotiate drug prices a rare defeat for Big Pharma

    Published by Reuters By Ahmed Aboulenein WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Big Pharma spent more than any other industry to lobby Congress and federal agencies this year, a Reuters analysis shows, but is still on course for a …Read More »
  • Confirmed: Trump Legal Team Believes FBI Informant Is Ex-Trump White House Staffer Who Relocated To Mar-a-Lago Post Presidency

    Confirmed: Trump Legal Team Believes FBI Informant Is Ex-Trump White House Staffer Who Relocated To Mar-a-Lago Post Presidency

    Published by Radar Online Mega The Mar-a-Lago mole who was the FBI’s confidential source which led to the sensational raid on Donald Trump is a former administration staffer who had specific knowledge of his private residence …Read More »
Previous Post: « Watch: Steve Jobs’ First TV Appearance
Next Post: Married NY GOP Congressman Christopher Lee Caught on Craigslist »

Primary Sidebar

Adjacent News

  • FBI sought nuclear documents in search of Trump’s home -Washington Post

    FBI sought nuclear documents in search of Trump’s home -Washington Post

  • FBI seized top secret documents at Trump’s home, U.S. government says

    FBI seized top secret documents at Trump’s home, U.S. government says

  • Salman Rushdie in surgery after being stabbed onstage

    Salman Rushdie in surgery after being stabbed onstage

Good Trash: Going to Read It Somewhere, Y’know

  • Ellen Has Not Contacted Ex-Lover Anne Heche Following Fiery Crash Into LA Home

    Ellen Has Not Contacted Ex-Lover Anne Heche Following Fiery Crash Into LA Home

  • Pete Davidson Proposed to Kim Kardashian Before Their Breakup

    Pete Davidson Proposed to Kim Kardashian Before Their Breakup

  • New bombshell book on Trump reveals he wanted to be treated like Hitler: ‘Totally loyal’

    New bombshell book on Trump reveals he wanted to be treated like Hitler: ‘Totally loyal’

RSS Partner Links

  • Cardi B Reveals The Secret To Her Shiny Hair
  • On the Rag, Vol. 720
  • Authorities Just Need To Review Alec Baldwin’s Phone Records Before Wrapping Up Their Investigation And Handing It Over To The DA
  • Anne Heche Is Dead @ 53 After Fiery Crash
  • Millie Bobby Brown Was Told She Was Too Mature To Make It As A Child Star
  • Open Post: Hosted By John Waters’ Fancy Dinner Party In A Dump
  • Song of the Day: 'Say You Love Me' by Fleetwood Mac

Most Recent

  • J&J to end global sales of talc-based baby powder

    J&J to end global sales of talc-based baby powder

  • Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda slams unauthorised production

    Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda slams unauthorised production

  • ‘It’s really irritating’: Madonna’s son David Banda wears her clothes ‘better’ than her

    ‘It’s really irritating’: Madonna’s son David Banda wears her clothes ‘better’ than her

  • Analysis: U.S. move to negotiate drug prices a rare defeat for Big Pharma

    Analysis: U.S. move to negotiate drug prices a rare defeat for Big Pharma

  • Confirmed: Trump Legal Team Believes FBI Informant Is Ex-Trump White House Staffer Who Relocated To Mar-a-Lago Post Presidency

    Confirmed: Trump Legal Team Believes FBI Informant Is Ex-Trump White House Staffer Who Relocated To Mar-a-Lago Post Presidency

  • Madonna wears grills to hide her ‘ugly’ teeth

    Madonna wears grills to hide her ‘ugly’ teeth

  • Lady Gaga tells Americans to ‘speak up’ in fight for abortion rights

    Lady Gaga tells Americans to ‘speak up’ in fight for abortion rights

  • What’s in Biden’s big climate and health bill?

    What’s in Biden’s big climate and health bill?

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd

Footer

Copyright © 2022 · Log in

×