• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Travel
  • Sports
  • Law/Justice
  • Celebrities
  • Republicans
  • Madonna
  • Books
  • Men
  • Trans Rights
  • Royals
  • Monkeypox
  • US judge throws out Texas ban on drag acts, calls it unconstitutional
  • Uganda’s anti-gay law causing wave of rights abuses, activists say
  • ‘American Horror Story’ Star Angelica Ross Calls Out Ryan Murphy For Ghosting Her After She Complained About ‘Racism’ On Set

New Mexico Supreme Court’s Marriage Equality Decision: An Analysis

Ari Ezra Waldman December 19, 2013

Court_nm

BY ARI EZRA WALDMAN

New Mexico became the 17th marriage equality state today when the state's supreme court declared marriage discrimination unconstitutional. It was a unanimous ruling and one that was based on legal concepts with which we should all be familiar: equal protection, intermediate scrutiny, state interests, and "responsible procreation".

NMFLAGRegular readers of Towleroad's law column already know the basics: The constitution–in this case, a state constitution–guarantees equal protection of the law. Denying marriage licenses to certain individuals simply because of their sex or sexual orientation is unequal treatment that the state has to justify. Because the LGBT community has long been a victim of institutionalized and insidious discrimination, the state has a high burden to meet, a burden we call "intermediate scrutiny." The supposed justification that restricting marriage to opposite sex couples prevents accidental children out of wedlock is no justification for discrimination because marriage has never had anything to do with raising children. Because the state cannot meets its burden, the discrimination is unconstitutional. Gays can marry.

It is remarkable that this legal narrative has become so simple, so obvious, so matter-of-fact that we can summarize it in a paragraph and move on. Ten years ago, it was a theory a few of us deeply believed in. But it has become as airtight a legal doctrine as any I know. Today's decision from the New Mexico Supreme Court reinforces that view. It also highlights the impact the Supreme Court's recent DOMA decision (Windsor v. United States) will have on the next generation of marriage cases.

Follow me AFTER THE JUMP for a more detailed analysis.

New Mexico is a unique case in the marriage wars. It's been slow to join the marriage equality club, but it never really had an explicit law banning same-sex marriage. Virginia, for example, has a state constitutional provision banning both in-state same-sex marriages and preventing the recognition of out-of-state same-sex marriages. New Mexico, on the other hand, had layered marriage laws that, taken together, made same-sex marriage impossible. For example, its statutes included gender-specific language, referring to "male applicant" and "female applicant." From this and other facts, the court concluded that the legislature's intent had always been to permit opposite-sex marriages but not same-sex ones.

CountiesOnce it was clear that New Mexico banned same-sex marriages, the court had to determine if doing so was constitutional. And although the case was based on state law, the arguments and legal doctrines were all remarkably similar to their federal counterparts.

And so the rest of the case sounds a lot like the substantive parts of Perry v. Brown, the Prop 8 case. The plaintiffs in New Mexico argued that they are just like opposite-sex couples: committed, in love, desirous of the state recognition and benefits associated with marriage. They, therefore, should be treated equally.

They also argued that, as members of the LGBT community, they had been subject to discrimination and had long been disfavored under the law, thus requiring the court to be extra skeptical of any state law that adds to that discrimination. This was the heightened scrutiny argument: Because the state has a history of discriminating against gays for no good reason, any such discrimination has to pass a high hurdle before it will pass constitutional muster. 

New Mexico's decision in this regard is actually of some note. To reach intermediate or heightened scrutiny, a plaintiff has to show that he or she is a member of a discrete subgroup defined by a characteristic beyond its control and irrelevant to being a productive member of society, that the group has been the subject of discrimination, and is politically "powerless". Opponents of marriage equality like to focus on the red herring of gay political power: The President of the United States supports us, the Democratic Party platform favors marriage equality, Tammy Baldwin is a member of the Senate, we raise millions for advocacy every year, and so on. 

But the court saw this for the nonsense that it is. As we have discussed before, the "political powerlessness" prong is not a math equation about how many public offices we hold or have much power our money gives us. It is, instead, meant to reflect the burdens we face in the political process. We have constitutional amendments enshrining our inequality in a majority of the states, hate crimes against gays are up and they are up in reaction to political successes, and advocacy is essential because of the continued discrimination against us and because of our gross under-representation in positions of power. What's more, our political successes are fragile, at risk of being overturned and at the mercy of a heterosexual majority. Understanding the scrutiny test this way is notable because the New Mexico court responded well to the same types of arguments of gay political power offered by Justices Scalia and Alito and Chief Justice Roberts at the Windsor and prop 8 hearings.

Back to the case at hand: The only real argument for treating same-sex and opposite-sex couples differently when it came to marriage was that keeping marriage an exclusive right of heterosexuals advanced the state goal of encouraging "responsible procreation." That is, that because opposite-sex couples are the only ones that could accidentally have children, they need marriage to keep children inside the marital union.

That, of course, is preposterous on many levels. And the New Mexico Supreme Court agreed. Marriage, the justices said, had never been associated or dependent upon child rearing or procreation. And banning an entire group of marrying would, in any event, do nothing to encourage an entirely different group to marry.

In the end, then, denying same-sex couples marriage licenses violates equal protection and does not pass intermediate scrutiny in New Mexico. That argument mirrors the argument in Perry and will mirror the argument in every marriage case going forward. 

***

Follow me on Twitter: @ariezrawaldman

Ari Ezra Waldman is the Associate Director of the Institute for Information Law and Policy and a professor at New York Law School and is concurrently getting his PhD at Columbia University in New York City. He is a 2002 graduate of Harvard College and a 2005 graduate of Harvard Law School. Ari writes weekly posts on law and various LGBT issues.

Topics: News More Posts About: Ari Ezra Waldman, Ari Ezra Waldman, gay marriage, Gay Marriage, Law - Gay, LGBT, Law - Gay, LGBT, New Mexico, New Mexico, News

Related Posts
  • Trump ally seeks return to Congress, California votes on crime in U.S. midterm primaries
  • Former Roommate Indicted For Murder Of Florida LGBTQ Activist Jorge Diaz-Johnston, One of the Public Faces In State Fight For Marriage Equality
  • Russia Blocks Facebook, Accusing it of Restricting Access to Russian Media;
  • Uganda’s anti-gay law causing wave of rights abuses, activists say

    Uganda’s anti-gay law causing wave of rights abuses, activists say

    Published by Reuters KAMPALA (Reuters) – The consideration and passage by Uganda's government of one of the world's harshest anti-gay laws have unleashed a torrent of abuse against LGBTQ people, mostly committed by private individuals, rights …Read More »
  • ‘American Horror Story’ Star Angelica Ross Calls Out Ryan Murphy For Ghosting Her After She Complained About ‘Racism’ On Set

    ‘American Horror Story’ Star Angelica Ross Calls Out Ryan Murphy For Ghosting Her After She Complained About ‘Racism’ On Set

    Published by uInterview.com Angelica Ross has spoken out about the alleged mistreatment she was subjected to throughout her time on the show American Horror Story: 1984, and show creator Ryan Murphy‘s failure to support her. Ross …Read More »
  • ‘Grave matter’: White supremacist-turned-FBI informant gets suspended sentence on N.Y. weapons charge

    ‘Grave matter’: White supremacist-turned-FBI informant gets suspended sentence on N.Y. weapons charge

    Published by Raw Story Michael Alan Jones, a former Proud Boy and self-admitted paid FBI informant, is a free man after a federal judge issued a suspended sentence with two years of supervised release — a …Read More »
  • Fetterman trolls James Comer by gifting him a case of Bud Light to drink during impeachment inquiry

    Fetterman trolls James Comer by gifting him a case of Bud Light to drink during impeachment inquiry

    Published by Raw Story (UK) Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) had some more fun at the expense of congressional Republicans Thursday as they launched their impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden despite the fact that the government …Read More »
Previous Post: « Iowa Conservative Bob Vander Plaats Says Polygamy Ruling Will Lead To Child-Parent Marriages
Next Post: Santa’s Lap or Flu Shot? – VIDEO »

Primary Sidebar

Most Recent

  • US judge throws out Texas ban on drag acts, calls it unconstitutional

    US judge throws out Texas ban on drag acts, calls it unconstitutional

  • Uganda’s anti-gay law causing wave of rights abuses, activists say

    Uganda’s anti-gay law causing wave of rights abuses, activists say

  • ‘American Horror Story’ Star Angelica Ross Calls Out Ryan Murphy For Ghosting Her After She Complained About ‘Racism’ On Set

    ‘American Horror Story’ Star Angelica Ross Calls Out Ryan Murphy For Ghosting Her After She Complained About ‘Racism’ On Set

  • ‘Grave matter’: White supremacist-turned-FBI informant gets suspended sentence on N.Y. weapons charge

    ‘Grave matter’: White supremacist-turned-FBI informant gets suspended sentence on N.Y. weapons charge

  • Fetterman trolls James Comer by gifting him a case of Bud Light to drink during impeachment inquiry

    Fetterman trolls James Comer by gifting him a case of Bud Light to drink during impeachment inquiry

  • 12+ Instagram Sure Shots in Miami for the Social LGBTQ Visitor. All Mapped with More Top Spots … In Time For Your Fall Getaway Plans

    12+ Instagram Sure Shots in Miami for the Social LGBTQ Visitor. All Mapped with More Top Spots … In Time For Your Fall Getaway Plans

  • Bella Thorne used to have threesomes with Benjamin Mascolo

    Bella Thorne used to have threesomes with Benjamin Mascolo

  • John Waters believes mainstream Hollywood films are finally as shocking as his cult movies

    John Waters believes mainstream Hollywood films are finally as shocking as his cult movies

Adjacent News

  • Did the UAE ban the Barbie movie? What about Saudi Arabia?

    Did the UAE ban the Barbie movie? What about Saudi Arabia?

  • From penal camp, dissident Navalny calls on Russians to resist Putin

    From penal camp, dissident Navalny calls on Russians to resist Putin

  • As contentious judicial ‘reform’ becomes law in Israel, Netanyahu cements his political legacy

    As contentious judicial ‘reform’ becomes law in Israel, Netanyahu cements his political legacy

Good Trash: Going to Read It Somewhere, Y'know

  • Beyonce pays tribute to stabbed fan

    Beyonce pays tribute to stabbed fan

  • Dwight Howard’s Assault Accuser Submits Uber Receipt as Evidence in Court Battle With Ex-Lakers Star

    Dwight Howard’s Assault Accuser Submits Uber Receipt as Evidence in Court Battle With Ex-Lakers Star

  • After Bud Light, Ukraine ‘Scandals,’ Garth Brooks Surprises Again

    After Bud Light, Ukraine ‘Scandals,’ Garth Brooks Surprises Again

Partner Links

  • The Dam Breaks: First Co-Defendant In Georgia RICO Case Pleads Guilty
    Scott Hall, the bail bondsman who was involved in the Coffee […]
  • Tributes to Sen. Dianne Feinstein
    View this post on Instagram A post shared by Maria Shriver […]
  • Youth Climate Activists Occupy Qevin McQarthy's Office
    A group of youth climate activists occupied House Speaker Kevin McCarthy's […]
  • OMG, WATCH: The trailer for ‘SAW X’ is has arrived in time for the Halloween season to kick off
    That twisted hoe, Jigsaw, is back and this time it’s ‘more […]
  • Harvey Milk’s nephew Stuart pays tribute to Sen. Dianne Feinstein who has died at age 90
    View this post on Instagram A post shared by Stuart Milk […]

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd

About

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy
[towleroadmr] [towleroadtn]

Copyright © 2023 · Log in

×
×