• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Travel
  • Sports
  • Law/Justice
  • Celebrities
  • Republicans
  • Madonna
  • Books
  • Men
  • Trans Rights
  • Royals
  • Monkeypox
  • Sophia Bush’s girlfriend ‘proud’ the actress has opened up about coming out as queer
  • Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!
  • Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

Sixth Circuit Lets Gay Marriage Bans Stand in OH, MI, TN, and KY: Legal Analysis, Part 1

Ari Ezra Waldman November 6, 2014

6thcircuit

BY ARI EZRA WALDMAN

Reading the Sixth Circuit's opinion permitting states to ban same-sex marriage is a cognitively dissonant experience: the opinion isn't really about gays, marriage, or gay marriage. It is, as the dissent notes, an "engrossing TED talk" on political philosophy or democracy. It is, in other words, a magician's misdirection.

The Sixth Circuit's conservatives do not want us to realize that what they just did is tear away equal and fundamental rights from real committed, loving couples, many of whom are raising children. Rather, they want us to think that they were hamstrung by their humble roles and the narrow confines of their judicial charges. Well, they can't fool us and they won't fool Justice Kennedy.

In a meandering opinion riddled with rhetorical questions rather than reasoned legal analysis, Judge Sutton (above, middle) argues, essentially, that he cannot affirm the unconstitutionality of bans on same-sex marriage because he is handcuffed by three things: Baker v. Nelson, the limited role of the judiciary and the Constitution, and eons and eons of social tradition. His language suggests, not too convincingly, that he would jump at the chance to allow gays to marry if he were a voter or a legislator. But as a judge, sitting in an intermediate appellate court inferior to the Supreme Court, he can't. He just can't.

Don't let Judge Sutton's rhetoric fool you. Behind the gloss of reasonable-sounding respect for the dignity of gay persons lies the same odious discrimination we have been hearing from the rump of the radical right still apoplectic that two men or two women can marry.

GinsburgThe upshot of this opinion is that it is Justice Ginsburg's trigger for when she thought the Supreme Court might take up a marriage equality case: the Sixth Circuit has just upheld bans on same-sex marriage. Now we are on a track to return to the Supreme Court where we may get a substantive holding on marriage equality. Expect an appeal request to be filed quickly, and expect the Supreme Court to take the case. We may even get a decision in June, on the anniversary of Windsor.

This is the first in a series of columns on the Sixth Circuit's decision; there are just too many pieces to this opinion to cover at once. Stay tuned to Towleroad over the next few days for special in-depth coverage and analysis.

Let's begin with a general summary of Judge Sutton's primary motivating point, AFTER THE JUMP…

Judge Sutton's overriding concern, repeated a number of times during the opinion, is that it is his not his place to cut short a political process that is playing itself out in the states. Voters and elected officials are deciding what marriage laws they want and it is not for the federal judiciary or the Constitution to get in the way. He states: "Not one of the plaintiffs' theories, however, makes the case for constitutionalizing the definition of marriage and for removing the issue from the place it has been since the founding: in the hands of state voters."

Let's parse that sentence. 

SuttonBy claiming a so-called "humble" judicial posture, Judge Sutton is situating himself firmly within conservative legal doctrine for the last 50 years. The Warren Court, the 1960s progressive Supreme Court that revolutionized our relationship to the Constitution and finally turned it into the tool of justice it could be, was everything conservatives hated in that it was "activist," results-oriented, and cavalier with original tradition. Modern conservative legal theory is based, in large part, in opposition to the muscular justice of the Warren Court, which saw the judiciary as the guarantor of rights for those excluded or marginalized from the political process.

Conservatives disagree. The courts should step back and let politics rule. Conservatives feel that the Warren Court "constitutionalized" too many things, created too many rights in the body of the document. Conservatives see the Constitution as an old statement of minimal rights and privileges upon which states are allowed to build stronger structures if they please, but are not compelled to do so. That view played out in these marriage equality cases: the Constitution mentions nothing about marriage equality; states are free to do what they want with it.

The "politics" here are voter-approved same-sex marriage bans. And to those bans, Judge Sutton does nothing less than abdicate his judicial role. He throws up his hands and says (asks): How can I say that banning gays from marrying is irrational, hateful, or discriminatory when (a) that's not my job, (b) it's always been this way, and (c) neither the Supreme Court nor the Constitution says anything explicit to the contrary.

To prove that it is not his job, he gives us a pages-long lecture on federalism and separation of powers. To prove that it has always been this way, he types the word "millennia". And to prove that the Constitution and the Supreme Court do not compel him to act, he relies on the canard of Baker v. Nelson and the explicit plain language of the Constitution. Judge Sutton is not only wrong on all counts, he misunderstands the interplay between the Constitution, Court interpretation, and his job.

Baker, as I have discussed before, was a summary dismissal of a same-sex marriage ban challenge for lack of a federal question. It has, technically, never been overturned. To Judge Sutton, that means that something must pull him, kicking and screaming, from the default of dismissing this challenge pursuant to Baker. He found no such pull because there has been no explicit reference to it since. Essentially, Judge Sutton wants to be spoon fed: he stays idle until someone cuts his meat for him.

His yen for explicit instruction doesn't stop there. He, like Justice Byron White in Bowers v. Hardwick, misdefines the right at issue in this case. For Justice White, opponents of anti-sodomy laws were asking for a constitutional right to gay sex; for Judge Sutton, marriage equality advocates are asking for a constitutional right to get gay married. Both are wrong. As the Court noted in Lawrence, Bowers was really about a constitutionally recognized right to intimately associate with whom you please. Marriage equality cases are out of a similar vein and they involve the right to marry, not anything different.

Nothing except Judge Sutton's own biased conception of the role of the judiciary compels him to wait for explicit instructions on every aspect of a case before making a decision. Indeed, that is tantamount to an abdication of the judicial function.

In our next post, we will discuss and critique a few of Judge Sutton's arguments in detail.

***

Follow me on Twitter and on Facebook.

Ari Ezra Waldman is a professor of law and the Director of the Institute for Information Law and Policy at New York Law School and is concurrently getting his PhD at Columbia University in New York City. He is a 2002 graduate of Harvard College and a 2005 graduate of Harvard Law School. Ari writes weekly posts on law and various LGBT issues.

Topics: News, Politics, Supreme Court More Posts About: Ari Ezra Waldman, gay marriage, Law - Gay, LGBT, News

Related Posts
  • Former Roommate Indicted For Murder Of Florida LGBTQ Activist Jorge Diaz-Johnston, One of the Public Faces In State Fight For Marriage Equality
  • Russia Blocks Facebook, Accusing it of Restricting Access to Russian Media;
  • Survivor Benefits Payments For Same-Sex Partners Are Being Paid Under Biden, But Many Don’t Even Know They Qualify
  • Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!

    Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Mel B will “always be open” when it comes to her sexuality. The Spice Girls singer, 48, who reunited with her bandmates including the group's ex-singer Victoria Beckham for the fashion …Read More »
  • Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

    Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Megan Thee Stallion is being sued for allegedly creating a hostile work environment and forcing her cameraman to watch her having lesbian sex. The 29-year-old ‘Savage' rapper faces the salacious claims …Read More »
  • Mean Girls star Jonathan Bennett recalls the moment his life ‘changed forever’

    Mean Girls star Jonathan Bennett recalls the moment his life ‘changed forever’

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Jonathan Bennett's life was “changed forever” by his role in ‘Mean Girls'. The 42-year-old actor starred as heartthrob Aaron Samuels in the 2004 cult classic – which followed Lindsay Lohan, Rachel …Read More »
  • Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass gift basket to celebrate coming out

    Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass gift basket to celebrate coming out

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass a gift basket after he came out as gay. The 44-year-old NSYNC star revealed the legendary singer showed his support when Lance decided to reveal …Read More »
Previous Post: « Tom Daley and Dustin Lance Black are Offering Someone a Double Date in London: VIDEO
Next Post: ACLU to Appeal Sixth Circuit Decision to the U.S. Supreme Court »

Primary Sidebar

Most Recent

  • Sophia Bush’s girlfriend ‘proud’ the actress has opened up about coming out as queer

    Sophia Bush’s girlfriend ‘proud’ the actress has opened up about coming out as queer

  • Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!

    Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!

  • Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

    Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

  • Mean Girls star Jonathan Bennett recalls the moment his life ‘changed forever’

    Mean Girls star Jonathan Bennett recalls the moment his life ‘changed forever’

  • Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass gift basket to celebrate coming out

    Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass gift basket to celebrate coming out

  • Relationship status influences heterosexual women’s sexual prejudice towards lesbians

    Relationship status influences heterosexual women’s sexual prejudice towards lesbians

  • JoJo Siwa had a challenge transitioning to new grown-up image

    JoJo Siwa had a challenge transitioning to new grown-up image

  • Liz Hurley defends lesbian sex scene in new movie that was directed by her son

    Liz Hurley defends lesbian sex scene in new movie that was directed by her son

Partner Links

  • Morning Man Classic: Ricky Nelson!
    Ricky Nelson, one of the best looking men and most talented […]
  • Intel Chief Gabbard Failed Basic Cybersecurity Protocol For Years
    Once again, Wired did the digging and got the scoop about […]
  • On the Rag, Vol. 856
     This week's rag 'n' mag roundup features Sergio Fernandez, Kevin Fernandez, […]
  • Our Favorite Good News Story Of The Day: Do You Have A Flag?
    To work around the fuckery of the anti-DEI hysteria, in response […]
  • King Charles has left Princess Diana’s childhood home, Park House, to disrepair & rot
    For the first years of Princess Diana’s life, her father was […]

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd

About

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy
[towleroadmr] [towleroadtn]

Footer

Ptown Hacks 2018

Read

  • Travel
  • Film
  • Law – LGBT Rights
  • Columns
  • Specials

About

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Log in

×
×