• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Body
  • Daily Resist
  • POLITICS
  • Travel
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Film
  • TV
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Men
  • Marriage Equality
  • Space
  • Trans Rights
  • Books
  • Science
  • Gay Iconography
  • TowleREAD

It’s On! Supreme Court Will Hear Marriage Equality Cases: An Early Analysis

January 16, 2015 by Ari Ezra Waldman

Scotus

BY ARI EZRA WALDMAN

As widely expected, the Supreme Court decided to hear four marriage equality cases out of the Sixth Circuit. Cases from Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee will be consolidated into one omnibus marriage hearing over 2 1/2 hours. With the order issued today, the briefing schedule has the parties' briefs due between February and April. That means that the Court could issue a decision by the end of June 2015.

Unlike the last time the Court heard a case challenging a state ban on marriage equality (the Prop 8 case), the Court does not appear likely to sidestep the central issue. The "questions presented" for the hearing are as follows:

1. Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex?

2. Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state?

These are the legal questions at the heart of the marriage equality movement. They should be squarely addressed in this case.

This post begins a series of analyses and reports on the case, which will be rolled out as the case unfolds over the next couple of months.

For now,the first of several initial considerations as we take the next step in this journey.

CONTINUED, AFTER THE JUMP…

This was expected. 

6thcircuitAlthough the Supreme Court does not have to hear cases when there are conflicting opinions from federal appellate courts, circuit splits, as they are called, are among the most common reasons why the justices agree to take a case. The Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits all held that bans on gays marrying violate either the Equal Protection Clause or the Due Process Clause of the Constitution. However, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, in a rambling, off-topic opinion, held that the Constitution does not prevent states from banning gays from marrying. In reality, the Sixth Circuit didn't even say that: Judge Sutton's opinion, as I argued here, essentially abdicated the judiciary's role as he threw up his hands in the face of a majority of state voters who had once supported a ban on the freedom to marry.

What's more, Justice Ginsburg had telegraphed this publicly. Justifying the Court's refusal to hear cases coming out of the Fourth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits, the leader of the Court's progressive wing stated that the Court only gets involved when it has to. She suggested that we "pay attention to the Sixth Circuit," which ultimately gave her the invitation she wanted.

The Court has already tipped its hat which way it's leaning.

We cannot be sure how the justices will rule. No one can. But several pieces of evidence suggest that the Court is leaning in the direction of recognizing a nation wide freedom to marry. Let's review the evidence:

1. The Court let stand pro-equality decisions in the Fourth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits, eventually bringing marriage equality to states like Kansas, South Carolina, Utah, Montana, and Idaho. Of course, allowing lower court decisions to stand without review does not necessarily mean a majority of the Supreme Court would have sided the same way, but it does mean that there were 6 justices who did not want to take the case (you need 4 to grant a petition). So, in addition to the liberal justices not wanting to rock the boat, two conservatives had to agree to see marriage equality come to a wide swath of the country. It seems manifestly unlikely that the Court would let thousands of gay couples marry and then, several months later, take it all back.

2. The Court rejected a petition to extend the stay holding back Florida's marriage equality order. As I argued here, this was an important step because it was the first time the Supreme Court had allowed marriage equality to go into effect in a jurisdiction beyond those covered by pro-marriage equality decisions from a federal appellate court. The Eleventh Circuit remains silent on the matter. To allow marriage freedom without a covering appellate court decision is even more a signal of where the Court is headed.

3. Justice Kennedy is the swing vote and although none of his LGBT rights opinions — including Romer, Lawrence, and Windsor — are explicitly pro-marriage equality, a reasonable interpretation of those opinions is that Kennedy has taken the slow, scenic route to marriage. First, he started with recognizing that gay persons are a protected class under the Constitution and, as such, they deserve certain rights against discrimination (Romer). Then he held that those rights extend to gay persons' intimate associations, or the rights to decide with whom to express love (Lawrence). Finally, he decided that the federal government had no legitimate reason to discriminate against legally married same-sex couples (Windsor). In deciding Windsor, not only did Justice Kennedy destroy all the arguments justifying the Defense of Marriage Act, but he also eviscerated the arguments propping up any remaining state bans on the freedom to marry. We know what comes next.

Stay tuned to Towleroad for additional analysis as the story unfolds.

***

Follow me on Twitter and on Facebook.

Ari Ezra Waldman is a professor of law and the Director of the Institute for Information Law and Policy at New York Law School and is concurrently getting his PhD at Columbia University in New York City. He is a 2002 graduate of Harvard College and a 2005 graduate of Harvard Law School. Ari writes weekly posts on law and various LGBT issues.

Filed Under: News, Supreme Court Tagged With: Ari Ezra Waldman, gay marriage, Law - Gay, LGBT, News, Supreme Court

Recent Posts

  • Randy Rainbow Measures 2,102,400 Minutes of Donald’s Presidency in ‘Seasons of Trump’ Sendoff: WATCH

    Randy Rainbow Measures 2,102,400 Minutes of Donald’s Presidency in ‘Seasons of Trump’ Sendoff: WATCH

    2 hours ago
  • Roberta Kaplan, Who Won Edie Windsor’s DOMA Case, is About to Put Trump in a Whole Lot of Legal Pain

    Roberta Kaplan, Who Won Edie Windsor’s DOMA Case, is About to Put Trump in a Whole Lot of Legal Pain

    3 hours ago
  • Photog Complains After Instagram Censors Sexy Underwear Shoot of TikToker Noah Beck: ‘What is So Offensive About a Confident Male Body?’

    Photog Complains After Instagram Censors Sexy Underwear Shoot of TikToker Noah Beck: ‘What is So Offensive About a Confident Male Body?’

    4 hours ago
  • 200,000 Flags Take Place of Americans on National Mall Ahead of Biden-Harris Inauguration: WATCH

    200,000 Flags Take Place of Americans on National Mall Ahead of Biden-Harris Inauguration: WATCH

    4 hours ago
Previous Post: « Broadway’s ‘Hedwig and the Angry Inch’ Has Donated $400K to Help At-Risk LGBT Youth
Next Post: What Happens If We Lose the Supreme Court Gay Marriage Cases? »

Primary Sidebar

  • Randy Rainbow Measures 2,102,400 Minutes of Donald’s Presidency in ‘Seasons of Trump’ Sendoff: WATCH

  • Roberta Kaplan, Who Won Edie Windsor’s DOMA Case, is About to Put Trump in a Whole Lot of Legal Pain

  • Photog Complains After Instagram Censors Sexy Underwear Shoot of TikToker Noah Beck: ‘What is So Offensive About a Confident Male Body?’

Recent Posts

  • Randy Rainbow Measures 2,102,400 Minutes of Donald’s Presidency in ‘Seasons of Trump’ Sendoff: WATCH

    Randy Rainbow Measures 2,102,400 Minutes of Donald’s Presidency in ‘Seasons of Trump’ Sendoff: WATCH

    2 hours ago
  • Roberta Kaplan, Who Won Edie Windsor’s DOMA Case, is About to Put Trump in a Whole Lot of Legal Pain

    Roberta Kaplan, Who Won Edie Windsor’s DOMA Case, is About to Put Trump in a Whole Lot of Legal Pain

    3 hours ago
  • Photog Complains After Instagram Censors Sexy Underwear Shoot of TikToker Noah Beck: ‘What is So Offensive About a Confident Male Body?’

    Photog Complains After Instagram Censors Sexy Underwear Shoot of TikToker Noah Beck: ‘What is So Offensive About a Confident Male Body?’

    4 hours ago
  • 200,000 Flags Take Place of Americans on National Mall Ahead of Biden-Harris Inauguration: WATCH

    200,000 Flags Take Place of Americans on National Mall Ahead of Biden-Harris Inauguration: WATCH

    4 hours ago
  • Giuliani Bashed Provisional Ballots in 2020 Election While Casting One of His Own

    Giuliani Bashed Provisional Ballots in 2020 Election While Casting One of His Own

    5 hours ago
  • Biden Picks Dr. Rachel Levine for Asst. Health Secretary; Would Make History as First Senate-Confirmed Transgender Federal Official

    Biden Picks Dr. Rachel Levine for Asst. Health Secretary; Would Make History as First Senate-Confirmed Transgender Federal Official

    5 hours ago
  • Pamela Anderson Pleads for Trump to Pardon Julian Assange: ‘This is Why He’s President’ — WATCH

    Pamela Anderson Pleads for Trump to Pardon Julian Assange: ‘This is Why He’s President’ — WATCH

    5 hours ago
  • QAnon Zealots Have Discussed Posing as National Guard to Penetrate Inauguration

    QAnon Zealots Have Discussed Posing as National Guard to Penetrate Inauguration

    6 hours ago
  • ‘Bed Bath & Beyond’ and ‘Kohls’ Have Dropped MyPillow Over Mike Lindell’s Support for Trump Insurrection

    ‘Bed Bath & Beyond’ and ‘Kohls’ Have Dropped MyPillow Over Mike Lindell’s Support for Trump Insurrection

    6 hours ago
  • Parler, Ben Sasse, Novak Djokovic, Rain Lounge, Josh Hawley, Angus King, ‘Dear White People’, Bill Barr: HOT LINKS

    Parler, Ben Sasse, Novak Djokovic, Rain Lounge, Josh Hawley, Angus King, ‘Dear White People’, Bill Barr: HOT LINKS

    21 hours ago

Most Commented

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Footer

Copyright © 2021 · Log in