Gay Marriage | New Jersey | News

BigGayDeal.com

NJ Commission: Civil Unions = Second Class Status

A new report to be released on Tuesday sheds light on New Jersey's civil union laws and concludes that they do not go far enough in providing equality to the state's citizens:

Nj_2"The commission held three public hearings last year where the majority of the testimony came from people who were in civil unions and said they were still not being treated the way married couples are by government agencies, employers and others. For instance, the commission finds that many companies in the state that are self-insured, and therefore are regulated by federal rather than state law, refuse to provide health insurance to the partners of their employees. While employers in Massachusetts could legally do the same thing, most do not, according to the report. The commission also finds that many people in the state do not understand civil unions. 'Civil union status is not clear to the general public," the report says, "which creates a second-class status.' The commission's report says the misunderstanding of civil unions makes it more difficult for a child to grow up in New Jersey with gay parents, or to be gay themselves."

According to New Jersey's Health and Senior Services Department, 2,329 couples had registered for civil unions as of the end of January.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. Yup, people I work with thought I should be content now that I can have a civil union in NJ. I looked at the health benefits for my company (a major healthcare system in the state) and I still have to pay an enormous amount of money in taxes to the Federal government to cover my partner (see, I can't even say spouse). If this isn't second-class citizenship I don't know what is.

    Posted by: JerzeeMike | Feb 18, 2008 4:47:46 PM


  2. FWIW Jerzeemike, even if NJ allowed same-sex marriages, you'd still be paying the federal income tax on the benefits. This is currently the case for couples married in MA. That won't change unless the federal government recognizes same-sex marriage (or civil unions) for income tax purposes.

    Posted by: Jeff | Feb 18, 2008 5:42:50 PM


  3. Thanks for posting this Andy.

    I thought we were second class citizens. But if married/partnered couples are second class, does that make unmarried/unpartnered third class? Are singles then little more than zoo animals or such (ok no jokes about late nite in a club all men are animals, etc!!) Now my head hurts just thinking about it!

    But seriously, has anyone got a link to the full report on this? Is it available? Thanks!

    Posted by: Sean R | Feb 18, 2008 6:35:34 PM


Post a comment









« «Iowa QB Yordi on Gay Slur: 'Just Getting a Good Laugh Out of It'« «