06/04/2008
Survivor Richard Hatch Takes Tax Case to Supreme Court
Survivor winner Richard Hatch, who is currently serving four years in the clink for tax evasion, has filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping to appeal his conviction:
"Hatch's lawyer, Michael Minns, has said his client confronted producers about cheating during taping of the show, and a producer promised his taxes would be paid if he kept quiet and went on to win the competition. CBS has said Hatch's claims have no merit. In a brief filed with the Supreme Court on May 23, Minns argued the judge improperly prevented Hatch from testifying about the conversation. Minns also argued the judge unfairly limited his cross-examination of the tax accountant who prepared Hatch's tax returns and who was a key witness for the government. 'He's extremely optimistic about his appeal,' Minns said. 'He still believes the system should work.' ... Minns also said Hatch was writing a book about 'his experiences with the legal system and his disappointment not just with the problems that he suffered but with the problems other people have suffered that he has met.' Hatch also was convicted of evading taxes on his earnings as co-host of a Boston radio show and from rental properties. He was acquitted of seven fraud charges related to a charity he planned to open for troubled youth."
Hatch's appearance in Another Gay Movie, AFTER THE JUMP...
Sphere: Related ContentPosted 9:28 AM EST by Andy in Crime, News, Reality TV, Richard Hatch | Permalink
Like it?
Subscribe to FREE Towleroad daily headlines with our RSS feed!
RECENT STORIES:
What an annoying non-story! It irritates me that this foolish tax cheat, whose 15 minutes of fame were spent long ago, still manages to get press for himself -- now by filing a spurious Supreme Court appeal (ANYONE can appeal to the Supreme Court, if you want to waste the filing fee money. You could appeal your parking ticket if you want to. Doesn't mean that even one of the Justices is going to read it.)
Really, why even report this?
Posted by: Buster | Jun 4, 2008 10:02:41 AM
Must he be nude always?
Posted by: Wes | Jun 4, 2008 10:17:59 AM
Yes, he MUST always be nude! Why blame him for the press? It's the "press" that decides what is "news"
Posted by: Norm | Jun 4, 2008 10:34:13 AM
Attention whore. Put your clothes on and get a life.
Posted by: JJ | Jun 4, 2008 10:54:05 AM
Jail couldn't have happened to a nicer person.
Posted by: Steve | Jun 4, 2008 11:14:05 AM
We definitely could do w/o the pic, man-tits and all.
Posted by: Rich | Jun 4, 2008 1:11:12 PM