Prince Harry | Shirtless

BigGayDeal.com

Prince Hairless

Har_09

Sneaky snapshots from Prince Harry's tour of Iraq Afghanistan are surfacing. No wonder they kept his presence a secret for so long—they wanted him all to themselves.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. I know the quality of the picture is poor, but Harry is HOT!

    Posted by: Jim | Jul 1, 2008 4:52:26 PM


  2. Those cum gutters could use a good hosing.

    Posted by: kansastock | Jul 1, 2008 4:56:07 PM


  3. I always thought Harry was the better looking of the two and I feel like I've been proved right. William has not aged well. Too much Windsor blood in him.

    And I have a big thing for redheads. :)

    Posted by: Alex | Jul 1, 2008 4:59:03 PM


  4. With all due respect to the Royal Family . . . Harry IS a HOTTIE! Red heads Rule. He makes Wills look like the ugly step sister. Woof!

    Posted by: jorge in paradise | Jul 1, 2008 5:11:27 PM


  5. Not just redheaded, but perpetually redfaced. I know it's hot in Iraq, but he always looks sunburned. Or drunk.

    So the British military doesn't require its soldiers to trim their hair?

    Posted by: Paul R | Jul 1, 2008 5:13:25 PM


  6. Holy bangers n mash! I'd like to see more of Harry. Looks like he's he going commando in his commandos as well.

    Posted by: Mark | Jul 1, 2008 5:13:38 PM


  7. Harry just keeps getting hotter, while Wills just looks more and more like a horse.

    Posted by: seattle mike | Jul 1, 2008 5:24:33 PM


  8. Ummm, Prince Harry was in Afganistan not Iraq.

    Posted by: homer | Jul 1, 2008 5:39:54 PM


  9. Prince Hairless indeed. Nothing like a smooth, Royal, ginger kid to help the holiday week go by. BTW I am pretty sure Prince Harry was deployed in Afghanistan not Iraq.

    Posted by: DanInSeattle | Jul 1, 2008 5:41:59 PM


  10. mamma mia, this pix is incredibly erotic, the naval, the tan line, and the edge of his commies hovering so tantalizingly right over the root of his oh so royal cock!

    Posted by: the queen | Jul 1, 2008 5:46:15 PM


  11. good lord he is HOT!!!!!!

    Posted by: peterparker | Jul 1, 2008 6:20:58 PM


  12. jesus joseph and mary....he is flippin hot. He has a nice V cut. Where is his underwear?

    Posted by: Travis | Jul 1, 2008 6:29:50 PM


  13. He's actually not hairless at all, as the other pictures from Afghanistan show. That color of hair just doesn't show up well in photos. Woof!

    Posted by: Kevinvt | Jul 1, 2008 6:39:39 PM


  14. While I do like looking at his hotness, I'm disturbed by the thought that someone serving with him cared so little about being in a war zone, especially one in which Harry did not have to be in but chose to be in, that he (or she?) took time from worrying about not getting shot to snap these pictures. I hope Harry's pals find out who took them and give him (or her) a right good kick in the ass.

    Posted by: Tim | Jul 1, 2008 9:09:46 PM


  15. A Force Recon USMC Major friend of mine years ago told me that he'd encourage his Marines to shave EVERYWHERE before going on deployments. It reduced the hiding-places for the "little critters" while in the bush, and was both a bonding exercise and a sneaky way for him to get a nice eye-full of wet enlisted Marines on-the-hoof. A lucky-few got to "help" the officers later in the evening for "chigger inspections".

    And it's not called commando-style for nothing. Shaved, baby-powdered and free-swinging prevents chafing, rashes, crotch-rot and critters. They just don't talk about it in front of the ladies-at-home, or the civilians.

    I'll just leave you with that mental-image.....lol.

    Posted by: Ted B. (Charging Rhino) | Jul 1, 2008 9:18:06 PM


  16. This blog is getting better and better.

    Posted by: JJ | Jul 1, 2008 9:27:39 PM


  17. Bluepoint alert! bluepoint alert!

    Posted by: nyc_guy | Jul 1, 2008 10:39:13 PM


  18. Of course Harry is the better looking of the two, James Hewitt is far better looking than Prince Charles!

    Posted by: John | Jul 1, 2008 11:45:09 PM


  19. Someone needs to tie him down and shave his head.

    Posted by: mascdudewriter | Jul 2, 2008 2:52:47 AM


  20. Relax, Evan. Gay guys show their pink bits all the time. Royalty doesn't. It's the unusual nature of the picture that caused the commentary, not self-hating. Save your righteous indignation for the many times when it's justified. :-)

    Posted by: The Milkman | Jul 2, 2008 8:50:56 AM


  21. I was waiting for someone to bring up the "self hating" aspect to this.
    Face it,the man is hot...damned hot..stiff in my boxers reading this at 8:30 in the morning hot.
    Looking and admiring a hot man, regardless of his orientation, is natural for gay men. Does this mean there needs to be disclaimer on ever item of gay porn indicating the orientation of the model or the actor??
    You will pry the photos of Prince Harry and Mario Lopez from my cold, dead hands, to paraphrase the NRA.

    Posted by: Robert | Jul 2, 2008 9:53:21 AM


  22. KILL ALL STRAIGHT PEOPLE!!!

    Posted by: crispy | Jul 2, 2008 10:03:47 AM


  23. I think the amount of comments is also related to the fact that Harry is famous. I think hot + famous will generate an incredible amount of response regardless of whether the guy is gay or straight.

    And the self-hating argument is pretty silly when we're looking at pictures of people most of us will probably never meet, much less hook up with and/or date (i.e., even if Daniel Craig was a raging homo, the chances are way slim he'd be wanting to treat me to a romantic dinner and show me his condom collection.)

    Posted by: Alex | Jul 2, 2008 10:04:03 AM


  24. I have always had a thing for Harry. William is cute, but Harry and his red hair has always been sexy to me. I would love to kneel before this Prince any day!

    Posted by: Daniel | Jul 2, 2008 10:34:30 AM


  25. END THE GAY OPPRESSION NOW! BRING DOWN OUR STRAIGHT MASTERS.

    Posted by: crispy | Jul 2, 2008 11:13:11 AM


Post a comment









« «Stop In The Name Of Love« «