California | Gay Marriage | Mark Leno | News | Proposition 8

BigGayDeal.com

California Bill Would Recognize Same-Sex Marriages from Elsewhere

SB54, a bill sponsored by State senator Mark Leno seeks to force California to decide how to treat out-of-state same-sex marriages since the Supreme Court's Proposition 8 decision did not address the topic. Currently, approximately 18,000 same-sex marriages valid before Prop. 8 passed are still legal as the Court allowed them to stand, but there is currently no statue directing how the state should recognize a same-sex couple married in Iowa, Massachusetts, or anywhere else it is legal.

The Sacramento Bee reports: Leno "The high court did not address how to treat out-of-state marriages, explaining in a footnote that none of the parties involved in lawsuits represented such interests. In that vacuum, Leno is arguing the Legislature's role should be to clarify the rights of same-sex couples who live in California but wed elsewhere, or couples who might move or travel here in the future...Frank Schubert, who was the campaign manager for Proposition 8, disagrees. He predicts a court battle over the law should it pass and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger sign it. "Our argument is that the people amended the constitution and do not approve of same-sex marriage," he said. There's nothing in the court's Proposition 8 decision, Schubert said, that should lead gay couples to think they can transfer marriage rights to California because they wed in another country or any of the six states that now allow gay marriage. Leno's bill would declare that any same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions before Proposition 8 be recognized on par with marriages that took place in California."

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. Well, this all depends on whether people who got married in another state during the dates it was legal in California have to re-register when they move to California. If they have to register again for each state they move to then they have no protections, however, if marriages are just automatic then the date of marriage applies so if it was within that 5 month period then they should be married.

    Posted by: Aiden Raccoon | Jul 21, 2009 5:25:02 PM


  2. Such a pitty for California to dismiss the much needed revenue that can be generated from gay marriages.

    Posted by: Duane | Jul 21, 2009 6:36:41 PM


  3. Marriages out of state are recognized by California now. There's no issue. Law makers in CA need to proceed with the status quo until such time as someone challenges marriages preformed out of state. Easy enough. Since LEGALLY there is no such thing as a "Same-Sex Marriage" or "Gay Marriage" CA law makers may proceed full steam ahead with current law. Treat marriage out of state like one would treat marriage in state.

    Posted by: Sargon Bighorn | Jul 21, 2009 6:52:10 PM


  4. ...Frank Schubert can gag on my big fat hard chubby.

    Fascists are as Fascists do.

    Posted by: Roger Ramjet | Jul 21, 2009 8:38:37 PM


  5. "'There's nothing in the court's Proposition 8 decision', Schubert said, 'that should lead gay couples to think they can transfer marriage rights to California because they wed in ... any of the six states that now allow gay marriage.'"

    Oh, so wrong! It's called "equal protection clause". The same argument was used to exclude inter-racial heterosexual couples from marriage privileges in the South. It was found unconstitutional. Plain & simple

    Posted by: Fix It Again Tony | Oct 12, 2009 1:33:01 PM


Post a comment







Trending


« «News: Charlotte, Carrie Prejean, San Diego Kiss-In, AIDS in Africa« «