Gay Marriage | Minnesota | News | NOM | St. Paul

Watch: MN NOM Pastor Supports 'Friendships' for Gay Couples, Says God Did Not Create Anal Sex


NOM Tour Tracker interviewer Arisha Hatch interviews St. Paul pastor Father Michael Becker about why he came out to NOM's rally, and about same-sex marriage and anal sex.

Says Becker:

"[In homosexual acts] you cannot have a full union of bodies and soul. You cannot have the fruition of children from love. God is not in the sexual acts that [homosexuals] commit."

He adds: "If you want to get to the nuts and bolts of it in the male homosexual world, I think the most heinous act is anal sex. Now, if anybody were to think about that in truth, they would say one person is being harmed by this act, which is why there are so many gastrointenstinal afflictions that come to many homosexuals that do this, and other kinds of afflictions. When you look at that individual act, you say, 'Did God create that? No way.' And would you ever want one of your children or grandchildren to be submitted to that kind of act? No."

Father Becker gets very flustered when he's asked if he's ever had a homosexual thought. I wonder why.


Feed This post's comment feed


  1. If anal sex is so bad for guys, it's just as bad (worse?) for women. So they should push hard to make it 100%, specifically illegal as a sex act in all 50 states, regardless of who's getting it. And see how many God-fearing Christians support that.

    Posted by: Matthew Rettenmund | Jul 29, 2010 12:23:46 PM

  2. Ummm, excuse me..but NOT All Gay people are into anal sex....just like NOT ALL str8 people Hate Anal a matter of fact..ALOT of men.."Bargain" with thier wives/girlfriends to Get some sex from the rear...MOst str8 porn I've ever seen, has plenty of anal sex. ...this pastor/mollestor needs to READ a Book by Dr Ruth, and the Pleasures of Human Sexuality....and of course Hygiene.

    Posted by: Disgusted American | Jul 29, 2010 12:26:26 PM

  3. He just never learned how to do it right. I am sure there are others in the rectory who can show him how.

    Posted by: candideinncc | Jul 29, 2010 12:29:43 PM

  4. and oral sex illegal too...this is rich.

    Posted by: Jon Mitchell | Jul 29, 2010 12:30:04 PM

  5. What about urinary track infections, are they also a result of traditional intercourse?

    Posted by: Alco | Jul 29, 2010 12:32:25 PM

  6. Sex god approves = Middle-aged married couple (preferably ugly, so as to not arouse too much excitement) strictly in missionary position under the covers in bed in pitch black darkness without any contraceptives with only the man having an orgasm.

    Oh and a priest assraping a minor. Almost forgot.

    Posted by: Chris K | Jul 29, 2010 12:39:37 PM

  7. Have any of you had or even know anyone who has had a gastrointestinal affliction due to anal sex?

    I'm not big on anal sex, but I can't think of this ever coming up with anyone I know.

    Posted by: Dusty | Jul 29, 2010 12:39:45 PM

  8. When a pastor speaks about anal sex in public I actually don't know how to react. It is almost too weird!
    This NOM Tour is a triumph making ridiculous statements. Is someone (not here but "out there") really taking these seriously?
    Matthew and Alco - yeah!

    Posted by: Matt26 | Jul 29, 2010 12:41:35 PM

  9. For a virgin he knows a lot about the 'ins and outs' of sexual activity...

    Posted by: gypsy78 | Jul 29, 2010 12:42:24 PM

  10. Okay, straight up -- this guy is fucking nuts. Period. He's totally completely crazy and shouldn't be teaching anywhere. Embarrassingly ignorant, ignorant doctrine. Talk about living out of "woundedness."

    "If you ask any scientist they won't tell you that people are born gay." Really?? Please bring up every scientist and let's ask, Father. I think you'll find that well, you're full of shit. Completely.

    I find it interesting that he talks about heterosexual sex as the ultimate bonding then also out of the otherside of his mouth he talks about the wholeness of celebacy.

    I keep waiting and waiting and waiting for one of these people to make a logical, substantial argument for their side instead of rushing back to ancient religious dogma and even more repulsivelly arrogant, speaking for God.

    Posted by: Bart | Jul 29, 2010 12:47:52 PM

  11. I was married for 15 years. By the end of that time, I really disliked the idea of heterosexual sex. Somewhere during that time I found it necessary to fantasize about sex with men to be able to perform. I have two great kids from that relationship. Just because I disliked heterosexual activity doesn't make me want to keep my kids from enjoying it. And had one of them turned out to be gay (which they didn't) I would certainly hope they would enjoy gay sex to the fullest. So in answer to your rhetorical question, would we want our children to participate in that act? Sure. Why the hell not. Especially when one loves the other party with whom we are having sex, it can be a transcendingly loving act.

    Posted by: candideinncc | Jul 29, 2010 12:49:20 PM

  12. ...hmmm, how does he know he's supposedly Hetero..if he's celebate? Dithering young girls there father? Notice how he couldn't just say "NO" the question of whether he's ever had Homosexual thoughts? ..inztead he ends the interview acted all

    Posted by: Disgusted American | Jul 29, 2010 12:50:05 PM

  13. Phobes are OBSESSED with anl intercourse. Far more than any gay man I've ever known.

    Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Jul 29, 2010 12:52:53 PM

  14. What does the bible say about cock on cock sex, NOTHING so i guess thats ok and wanking you cock between a guys but cheecks? nothing.

    If anel sex is done on a cleaned out butt with safe lube and done right thn it can be really good so i can only guess that this c**t has done it wrond so maybe he should read a sex book and get a clue.

    Posted by: mark | Jul 29, 2010 12:55:03 PM

  15. The tell-tale flecks of spittle and froth around his mouth (at 2.00 onward) are classic.
    Paging Dr Freud... paging Dr Freud....

    Posted by: Sane Soul | Jul 29, 2010 12:56:15 PM

  16. True...graphic, but true!

    Posted by: Tigerama | Jul 29, 2010 12:59:36 PM

  17. Two words: prostate gland

    Posted by: Laurie | Jul 29, 2010 1:00:55 PM


    I think up until recently anal sex was actually illegal. Isn't that what the sodomy laws were about?

    Posted by: MT | Jul 29, 2010 1:08:14 PM

  19. How do we know he's a real priest and not some weirdo that priest drag?

    Posted by: Ranchdad | Jul 29, 2010 1:10:47 PM

  20. Prior to modern healthcare, large numbers of women died during childbirth and its complications- a direct result of heterosexual sex.

    Posted by: homer | Jul 29, 2010 1:14:15 PM

  21. As a pastor, I thought he would have know that Mary was only a virgin if you don't count anal sex.

    Posted by: D.R.H. | Jul 29, 2010 1:17:36 PM

  22. I talked to my doctor about all these things I've heard about the prevelance of gastrointestinal issues in gay men (I've never had any and haven't heard about them from other gay men.). He told me, and I quote, "It's a bunch of bullshit made up by anti-gay bigots."

    Posted by: SammySeattle | Jul 29, 2010 1:20:47 PM

  23. Heterosexuals suffer a variety of potential ailments from the sex act--vaginal tears, STDs, miscarriages. The fact is that there are potential health risks to sex, both hetero and homo. Singling out gay sex practices and warning of the risks is nothing more than concern trolling.

    Posted by: candideinncc | Jul 29, 2010 1:22:43 PM

  24. "[In homosexual acts] you cannot have a full union of bodies and soul. You cannot have the fruition of children from love."

    But you can have that if you take a vow of celibacy. Right. Why haven't I realized that before?

    (Not that I believe for a moment that priests are really celibate, mind you. I learned better when I was a seminarian.)

    Posted by: jomicur | Jul 29, 2010 1:29:50 PM

  25. Obviously he's not doing it right!

    Posted by: Shane | Jul 29, 2010 1:30:46 PM

  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment


« «Watch: NOM's Brian Brown Interviewed in St. Paul, Minnesota« «