Barack Obama | Don't Ask, Don't Tell | Human Rights Campaign | Joe Solmonese | Military | News

BigGayDeal.com

HRC Sends Letter to Obama Saying DADT Must End This Year

Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese today sent a letter to President Obama regarding saying that it would be unacceptable for him to not use his authority as President to stop discharges of service members should we fail to succeed in legislative repeal this year.

Here's the letter: Hrc

Dear Mr. President:

Years from now, students of the movement for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality (LGBT) will no doubt see this fall as a pivotal period in the history of our struggle for fundamental fairness.  In January, we were all inspired by your State of the Union pledge to end our nation’s discriminatory ban on open service by gays and lesbians.  Equally inspiring was the testimony in support of repealing the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law by the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  We have come so far, but the only true measure of success is whether the thousands of brave gay and lesbian Americans who are serving their country, and the many more who want to serve their country, can do so openly and honestly.  We have not yet met that goal, and without your leadership and unparalleled efforts, this historic opportunity to remove a stain of discrimination from our nation will pass all of us by. 

Last week, lawyers for your administration asked for an emergency stay from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, seeking to end a worldwide injunction of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law while they work to overturn a federal judge’s conclusion that this law – one that you have called discriminatory and contrary to our national security on many occasions – offends the protections of our Constitution.  I continue to struggle with how your administration can defend a law you oppose, and how it could be even remotely constitutional for a statute to single out one group of brave Americans, because of who they are and who they love, and order them serve in silence and deception.  How can our government have a duty to defend a statute that is clearly so contrary to our Constitution’s guarantee of equality for all? 

More, AFTER THE JUMP...

The Ninth Circuit’s decision to stay Judge Phillips’s decision further frustrates repeal advocates and puts a bright spotlight on you to reconcile this endless legal wrangling with your public promise to end “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”  While we continue to call on your Administration not to appeal, if the Justice Department does insist on defending this discriminatory law, I strongly urge you to instruct government lawyers to inform the appellate court that the Executive Branch believes that the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law is unconstitutional. I agree with the esteemed lawyer and former head of the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice, Walter Dellinger, that such a move would send the Ninth Circuit a critically important message.  

Furthermore, the litigation strategy challenging “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is made all the more critical by the challenges a legislative repeal has faced in Congress.  While the House approved repeal by a wide margin, the Senate’s first and second attempts to move forward on the critical Defense Authorization bill were stymied by Republican obstructionists looking to score political points before the midterm elections.  There is still an opportunity for the Senate to send the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” to your desk in the lame duck session, but it will not happen if you do not put the full weight of the Office of the President of the United States behind it.  Republican opponents would rather see the Defense Authorization and everything in it – military pay raises, critical armor and equipment for our troops, health coverage for their families on the home front – fail than let gays and lesbians serve their country openly.  This is an outrageous insult to our troops, to their Commander-in-Chief, and to the Defense Department charged with their operations and their care.  You and Secretary Gates must be full partners in making clear to Senators that it is doubly unacceptable to hold hostage the needs of every soldier, sailor, airman and Marine in a desperate attempt to preserve a law that flies in the face of the American ideals they sacrifice to protect every day. 

It is because “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is contrary to our core values as a nation that it must end.  And we must have a durable solution – legislative repeal or a solid judicial decision.  But if those fail, you must not allow another day to go by in which a brave gay or lesbian service member is discharged based simply on sexual orientation.  HRC has urged your administration, privately and publicly, for more than a year to use every tool at your disposal as Chief Executive to at least significantly reduce discharges, if not end them entirely.  More can be done in this regard.

You can and should issue a stop-loss order suspending enforcement of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”  This discriminatory law has already deprived our military thousands of service members, many with critical skills in fighting terrorism.  You have acknowledged that it harms our national security.  If we fail to achieve legislative repeal this year, and if you will not abandon the defense of this discriminatory law in court, then it is imperative that you use your clear authority as President to end the discharges.  Anything less is unacceptable.    

We have fought long and hard to get this close to ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”  We pledge to continue that fight, every step of the way, until this unjust law is gone for good.  Future generations will look back at this moment – we must not let it become a setback in the long march toward full equality, but instead make it the turning point it is poised to become. 

Sincerely,

Joe Solmonese
President

 

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. +1

    Posted by: Matthew Rettenmund | Oct 25, 2010 6:19:30 PM


  2. Everyone rips on the Log Cabinettes but they're willing to get their hands dirty ie. DADT. Why can't the HRC actually use some of the immense funding it receives to fight some legal battles rather than write letters?

    Posted by: D.R.H. | Oct 25, 2010 6:27:41 PM


  3. How much is Andy Towle paid to shill for the HRC?

    Posted by: JoeSchmoe | Oct 25, 2010 6:29:08 PM


  4. Good to see them do this... 2 years late.

    This is one of the first letters they should have put on Obama's desk. And, even if 2009 was all about finances, then they should have pushed him to put it firmly on his 2010 agenda last year. Better late than never I guess... accept for all the people who wanted to join and didn't or those who got kicked out.

    Posted by: Joe | Oct 25, 2010 6:37:47 PM


  5. My response to HRC. Whatever. You've been apologists for Obama's homophobia for the last 2 years. This should have been done on Obama's first day in office. HRC is one of the wealthiest LGBT groups and yet the most it has done is have cocktail parties at the White House. I'd rather give to GetEqual.

    Posted by: Brad | Oct 25, 2010 6:42:32 PM


  6. Wow. A letter. What did this letter cost? About a million dollars a word in donations?

    The irony of this is so extrodinary it's hard not to laugh, it's hard not to cry.

    Posted by: Bart | Oct 25, 2010 6:52:59 PM


  7. hrc's revenue is way way way down and you can find some of their fiscal info here:

    http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/2010/10/hrc-17-revenue-drop-solmonese-salary.html

    we need more folks looking at hrc's fiscal health and what they do with their gay dollars.

    Posted by: MPetrelis | Oct 25, 2010 6:55:52 PM


  8. You know, I have to agree with DRH. For all the rhetoric thrown around by the HRC the LCR actually got down to some action on this and have forced some movement on the matter. I'm beginning to wonder what they actually do up there on Rhode Island Ave.

    Posted by: RBearSAT | Oct 25, 2010 6:58:01 PM


  9. I think a letter from my grandmother has more "weight" than the HRC's letter, and she's been dead for decades.

    Posted by: Queer Equality Revolution | Oct 25, 2010 7:06:32 PM


  10. A HRC letter now ? What?
    Hasn't DADT been unconstitutional since its inception ?
    Where was the condemnation up to now ?
    Where was the pressure on Obama by the HRC up to now ?

    Posted by: JackFknTwist | Oct 25, 2010 7:07:34 PM


  11. Wow, who woke somebody up at HRC? This is high-powered action from that crowd. I hope nobody had to miss a cocktail party or White House reception to take time to write a worthless letter.

    Why anybody gives HRC a dime is a mystery.

    Posted by: LincolnLounger | Oct 25, 2010 7:24:59 PM


  12. And right into the White House shredder.

    Posted by: patrick nyc | Oct 25, 2010 7:32:29 PM


  13. News to gay Americans who don't like HRC. Politics in America, for better or worse -- much worse -- happen to operate based on lobbying. It's sad. It's depressing. I wish it were unconstitutional, but that's how it is.

    We could cut out HRC completely and just go the honorable way of letting the anti-gay lobbying go on unhindered. And we'd be toast.

    If you don't like HRC and don't like the job they do, then directly support some other group like Lambda Legal or one of the servicemembers groups, but stop living in a dreamland. Lobbying is how this country functions (insofar as it does).

    Posted by: BobN | Oct 25, 2010 7:34:04 PM


  14. BobN let's be clear. LCR did more with its lawsuit challenging DADT constitutionality than HRC has done with its "lobbying" since this issue came to be in 1993. That's 17 years and a bunch of money to accomplish very little. I'm not sure what LCR's legal expense has been but I can bet you it's a lot less than HRC has spent on the matter. I'm not saying that's the best way to go and lobbying is required. However, a letter is all HRC can muster in this matter? This White House has false started so many times on GLBT issues it's embarrassing. Jarrett's comments ought to have her demoted for her actions yet she remains in a top spot as an Obama crony. She showed insensitivity to the issue which means she's clueless on the matter.

    Posted by: RBearSAT | Oct 25, 2010 8:16:44 PM


  15. OOOOOOh I'm scared!

    Oh brother. The repeal of DADT is written into the Defense Authorization Bill because that is a "must pass" bill. It will get passed during the "lame duck" session. HRC is just revving up their Happy Dance "Donate Now" machine for the day it finally happens.

    They will claim it for their 7 jillion members within 6 seconds of passage, just watch.

    Posted by: Derek Washington | Oct 25, 2010 8:19:05 PM


  16. BOBN - no one objects to lobbying. We just want it to be done well.

    Posted by: justiceontherocks | Oct 25, 2010 8:53:41 PM


  17. I used to call LCR the lapdog of the Republican Party. They were cozy and easy to appease by giving them a place, sometimes, in the room. Now I'm beginning to think HRC is becoming the lapdog of the Democratic Party. Pet them enough and they'll just be happy and lick you and be your best pet. LCR has turned into quite the bulldog. BTW, where's Stonewall Dems in all this uproar?

    Posted by: RBearSAT | Oct 25, 2010 9:50:21 PM


  18. I wonder how long Joe Solmonese is actually willing hold his breath to back up this tantrum? 20 seconds, 30 max.

    Posted by: Rebel | Oct 25, 2010 10:18:26 PM


  19. LOL it's my doing. I chewed out one of their fundraisers just last night and now this. :-)~

    Posted by: Tim W | Oct 25, 2010 10:31:31 PM


  20. HRC is plainly ineffective. It's unfortunate that so many corporate executives (straight supporters) trying to do the right thing for gay rights identify HRC as the group they are supposed to support. There are so many other LGBT groups that have produced real results -- Lambda Legal, ACLU's LGBT Rights Project, GLAAD, NCLR, GLAD in New England -- and newer active groups that are energetic and promising. Yet we are saddled with HRC, sopping up so much money, for an occasional huffy letter like this.

    Posted by: Jeff | Oct 25, 2010 10:58:20 PM


  21. Read...tossed...NEXT!

    Posted by: Chris in Irvine | Oct 26, 2010 1:29:47 AM


  22. That's funny, If I could imagine one group that so expertly sums the towleroad commentators views and disposition it would be the HRC. "Here read this letter about how mad I am." Should be on your flag.

    Posted by: Fenrox | Oct 26, 2010 9:07:05 AM


  23. HRC is a joke. All it does is raise funds, write letters and e-mails, and speak at big events.

    Posted by: Shane | Oct 26, 2010 2:36:35 PM


  24. @Fenrox
    Clearly, the "read my mad letter" response is having an impact: donations are down to the professional activist groups like HRC, and Democrats are finding it hard to pull in gay voters with their hollow promises. Too many bridges burned. This year, they'll get a good lesson in how failure to deliver on issues = failure to excite your voting base = early retirement. Sure, there will be a bunch of nazi homophobes who get to sit in Congress for a few years, but the next round of elections will get a little bit more savvy on delivering for progressives. Or else they'll lose too.

    Posted by: ChimChim | Oct 27, 2010 12:12:10 PM


Post a comment









« «Towleroad Guide to the Tube #761« «