Gay Marriage | Minnesota | News

BigGayDeal.com

Minnesota GOP Introduces, Fast-Tracks Ballot Initiative to Ban Same-Sex Marriage

Despite an economic crisis in the state and a budget that is still pending, Minnesota Republicans have decided instead to focus on bashing gays, the Minnesota Independent reports:

Limmer Republicans in the Minnesota Senate introduced three bills on Tuesday that aim to put a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage before voters in 2012. Minnesota law already outlaws same-sex marriage.

Not only that, the bill will be fast-tracked to meet a committee deadline and will get a hearing this week. 

Said the bill's author Sen. Warren Limmer (right): "We believe we owe the public the opportunity to be engaged...Personally I don’t think there’s going to be that much backlash on this. We want to give the public as much time as possible to consider it."

More:

Since the bill is a ballot initiative, it will bypass Gov. Mark Dayton’s veto pen should it pass both chambers of the Legislature, which — since both bodies are controlled by Republicans — it seems likely to do.

The ballot question would read, “Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to provide that only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Minnesota?”

Dibble Towleroad received a statement from openly gay state senator Scott Dibble (D-Minneapolis):

“It’s disturbing that Republicans want to use one of the last weeks of the legislative session to marginalize one group of people and divide our state. We are facing a $5 billion budget shortfall, yet Republicans believe the biggest threat to our state’s welfare is who is allowed to be married.”
 
“For same-sex couples, marriage is about economics; it’s about allowing families to take responsibility for each other and support their loved ones, creating strong households throughout our state. For this reason, there is significant evidence that the states that do the best economically are the ones that embrace diversity, not shut it out. With this amendment, we are taking Minnesota in exactly the opposite direction of where we should be headed – toward a stronger economy that welcomes the contributions of all people.”
 
“Minnesotans who are married legally have access to at least 515 laws that provide security, legal protections, and basic rights such as the ability to care for each other. As lawmakers, we should be focused on breaking these barriers that still exist for thousands of Minnesotans, rather than further isolating one group of people and wasting taxpayers’ time with unfounded fears.”
 
“This issue doesn’t help a single family in Minnesota, it doesn’t create a single job, and it actually harms our state’s economy. It is very troubling that we’re being asked to spend the final days of the legislative session focused on such a divisive issue.”

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. There is nothing in this nation as wicked, cruel, evil and hateful as a Republican. The most despicable people I have ever known have been conservative Republicans.

    I've been told by some that I'm too judgmental when it comes to Republicans, that there are some good ones. I'll acknowledge there are good Republicans and they can be found in every cemetery and mausoleum around the country.

    Posted by: Bob R | Apr 26, 2011 6:45:58 PM


  2. well to lcr and goproud just another example of how sticking with repuks gets you another kick in the ass. minnesota seems to have amany more problems whether two people who love each other get married. it seems like an awful lot of gay suicide stories come from there. could it be the way the state treats gays. homophobia is taught and it looks like the the state repuks teach it well. let's see how many of these homphobes get money from target.

    Posted by: walter | Apr 26, 2011 6:54:37 PM


  3. As a proud born and raised Minnesotan, what happened to the days of Hubert Humphrey and the proud democratic heritage of the state? It's hard to believe that with the likes of Bachmann and this crap that MN can now say that its becoming more right than VA where I now hail from. Just a few years ago I would have thought that inconcievable. Sad.

    Posted by: Virginian | Apr 26, 2011 6:59:05 PM


  4. The ReTHUGlicans are at it again. In an effort to paper over their fiscal fiasco in places like Minnesota, Tennessee, & Texas, they are using the ol' gay marriage diversion BS - anything to deflect attention away from their incompetence in governance. Hard to believe that this still works, but apparently it still has legs-

    Posted by: Joe | Apr 26, 2011 7:01:40 PM


  5. So they want to make it illegal...again? Same-sex marriage is illegal so they want to amend the state constitution to make it illegal? I don't get it.

    Posted by: K | Apr 26, 2011 7:06:57 PM


  6. @K yeah, that makes it all the more ridiculous. I guess they want to exploit the fact that they control both houses to put the ban into the constitution and thus make it harder to reverse? That's my best guess.

    Posted by: poison | Apr 26, 2011 7:15:09 PM



  7. That guy at the top cruises parks.

    I know this.

    Posted by: AllBeefPatty | Apr 26, 2011 7:21:01 PM


  8. Let there be NO doubt, in government, especially at the state and federal level, we, the GLBT community, have met the enemy and the enemy is the Republican Party. If gay person is in doubt, they're misguided deluded members of the Log Cabin Repuggies or GOProud. I will never ever be convinced that a sane person can be gay AND Republican at the same time. How can you hope to have any self-worth yet believe in a party that does NOT want you (and your God-hating "choice" of a same sex "lifestyle") in their midst - let alone support your efforts to obtain civil rights equal to straight citizens? It simply...does...not...compute!

    I'm afraid that as long as GOPers continue to pass anti-gay laws and the courts don't decide on granting GLBT civil rights by overturning or preventing such laws, there may be an unfortunate GLBT backlash against the straight establishment. I sense a gradually building unrest in certain quarters if homophbia continues to be codified in the law without any legal relief. It could turn into a nationwide version of the 1969 Stonewall Uprising - Part 2. I'm just sayin'....

    Posted by: HadenoughBS | Apr 26, 2011 7:27:33 PM


  9. where are the goproud people at?

    all these repubs trying to pass so many bills against gays in only a few months of coming into power

    does this mean goproud people are delusional, say it isn't so

    Posted by: mstrozfckslv@yahoo.com | Apr 26, 2011 7:40:58 PM


  10. ARGH I want revenge.

    Posted by: X | Apr 26, 2011 8:09:46 PM


  11. Gotta love that focus on job creation.

    Posted by: Dale | Apr 26, 2011 8:17:50 PM


  12. They. Are. So. Very. Afraid.

    Posted by: kodiak | Apr 26, 2011 8:22:16 PM


  13. Senator Dibble's rhetoric is effective in convincing moderate conservatives and should be used more often by equality advocates. Too often we focus on the right to marry as per the 14th Amendment, while conservatives do not share our idealist perspective on individual liberties. In other words, if rights for the "Other" is unproductive from a collectivist standpoint, they will oppose it.

    Therefore, it's essential to develop a narrative of marriage equality as the common good; if given economic and social benefits of same-sex marriage, many more will support it.

    Posted by: Go Scott | Apr 26, 2011 8:34:40 PM


  14. Christ Minnesota. What are you trying to be; Arizona, South Carolina, Kentucky, Texas, Utah...?

    Posted by: christopher | Apr 26, 2011 8:51:12 PM


  15. Scott Dibble says it well, except it's not just about economics for same-sex couples and families, it's about basic liberty, and love. The economic boons are a secondary benefit yes, and that is a good point to educate moderates on. The extremists would be happy to sink the state economically to exercise their hate.

    Posted by: Ian | Apr 26, 2011 8:52:33 PM


  16. It's time for gay people in these states, en masse, to start withholding/refusing to pay state income tax in an amount equal to 2/5 of the state tax obligation. Call it the "Gay Dred Scott" tax credit. Make the pricks come after each gay person individually in court, and shut down the system. Demand jury trials in each case. Time for civil disobedience motherf*ckers!

    Posted by: Jack F | Apr 26, 2011 9:19:05 PM


  17. Just remember, when shopping at Target and Best Buy, you are helping fund the Republicans of the Great State of Minnesota.

    Posted by: Matt Ford | Apr 26, 2011 9:33:30 PM


  18. F YOU BIGOT PARTY

    Posted by: curtis | Apr 26, 2011 9:33:40 PM


  19. @AllBeefPatty, Pics or it didn't happen

    Posted by: Question | Apr 26, 2011 9:50:49 PM


  20. Minnesota is not all that conservative a state. Is there any chance this could backfire on the Rebublicans? I could see a scenario where the public is angry about Republicans pushing social issues instead of focusing on the economy and the result is a defeat of this measure giving the pro marriage equality side a huge symbolic victory and maybe returning control of the legislature to the Democrats. Or am I giving Minnesotans too much credit?

    Posted by: Ken | Apr 26, 2011 10:52:56 PM


  21. I know many here hate Obama, but this is the alternative. Ye reap what ye sow. Thanks haters.

    Posted by: dms | Apr 26, 2011 10:53:38 PM


  22. Losers!!!

    Posted by: alan brickman | Apr 26, 2011 10:58:14 PM


  23. Lol. Was watching republicans getting booed today by their own constituents on rachel maddow. Thought to self; self, how are the republicans going to spin their way out of an extremely hostile news cycle. Then voila! Out of the blue BAM. This.

    Posted by: Mikey Mugglesworth | Apr 26, 2011 11:00:57 PM


  24. More and more it's becoming obvious if it wasn't already that we are under siege and under attack in this country as a community, more than before. It was predicted, as we gain acceptance and awareness, that the hate would ratchet up. Things like this hurt the bigots and help us more than anything else but sadly there will be a lot of pain and agony along the way as we make our place in a culture that is largely homophobic and heterosexist.

    Republicans have and will continue to use us as a diversion from their own transgressions. Economy gone bad, time to attack the gays. Paul Ryan budget plan a total fail, let's attack the gays. Fewer and fewer people going to church, let's go after the gays. These people see us as a vulnerable minority group they can take advantage of. They have no regard of our humanity. If we are going to continue making hay in this country, we have to fight fire with fire.

    Posted by: Francis | Apr 26, 2011 11:37:39 PM


  25. "Despite an economic crisis in the state..."

    Despite? Maybe *because*.

    Posted by: chuck b. | Apr 26, 2011 11:49:34 PM


  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «MUSIC NEWS: The Wombats, Poly Styrene, Rufus Wainwright, M.I.A., Bon Iver, Franz Ferdinand, Explosions in the Sky, Emmylou Harris« «