Alaska | Anchorage | Discrimination | News

No Investigation Into Anchorage Gay Ordinance Vote

6a00d8341c730253ef016303b932c5970d-800wiThe battle to win LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination laws in Anchorage, Alaska, has come to an end. Well, maybe.

Local NBC affiliate KTUU reports that the Anchorage Assembly voted Tuesday evening 7-4 not to launch an independent investigation into allegations that conservatives committed voter fraud by telling supporters they could register on the same day as the vote and separate claims that ballot shortages unfairly cost equality activists a winning vote.

But not all the Assembly members, even those who voted against an investigation, are convinced there weren't some shenanigans at play in the vote.

From the Kansas City Star, via Joe My God:

Some Assembly members who voted "no" said they liked the idea but wanted more information first to better direct the investigation.

Assembly Chairwoman Debbie Ossiander announced the Assembly would have a work session on the election Friday and would hear from the city clerk as well as the six-person Election Commission.

The clerk's office, which runs the elections, has said that 53 of 121 precincts at least temporarily ran short on ballots, based on a preliminary review. The shortages frustrated voters who drove from polling place to polling place in search of a way to choose their mayor and pick sides in the fractious gay rights debate.

One Assembly member said during a break that the election irregularities may have been severe enough to justify a redo.

"That's my gut feeling," said Harriet Drummond, who chairs the Assembly elections and ethics committee… "There are so many errors. There's no way to fix a specific point of blame at this point in time until we have answers to all these questions."

So while there will be no official investigation for now, it seems the case is not yet closed. That's at least better than nothing, right?

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. It should be mandatory that any legitimate question of voter fraud be investigated by the Federal Attorney General. Why is it that the GOP uses voter fraud to pass laws that suppress, restrict or deny people the right to vote when the GOP is almost always the perpetrator of almost all voter fraud? How many elections have been stolen for the GOP where there are legitimate questions of voter fraud carried out by Republican operatives?

    Posted by: Bob R | Apr 12, 2012 9:08:38 AM

  2. If a voter fraud investigation can simply be voted up or down by a small local committee, how could one ever genuinely investigate widespread voter fraud? That sounds like putting the foxes in charge of the hen-house.

    Posted by: bobbyjoe | Apr 12, 2012 11:18:27 AM

Post a comment


« «Chris Matthews Says Gay Activists Make "Good Argument" On Tony Perkins Protest: VIDEO« «