Barney Frank | Chris Matthews | Gay Adoption | Gay Marriage | News | Tony Perkins

Barney Frank Rips Hate Group Leader Tony Perkins Over Gay Marriage, Adoption on Hardball: VIDEO


Chris Matthews and Barney Frank tore into Tony Perkins last night for his statements that gay people are the result of bad parenting and the religious right's campaign against same-sex marriage.


Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Feed This post's comment feed


  1. Its about time Tony actually got Hardball instead of the usual softball Chris Matthews has allowed. Those confrontations from our side must have finally shown Chris the light.

    Posted by: Mickey | May 11, 2012 9:14:17 AM

  2. Tony is a SLIMEBALL! who shpuld be tared and feathered!

    Posted by: CHRIS DACHOCOLATEBEARCUB | May 11, 2012 9:23:14 AM

  3. What a great way to start the day. Apparently Matthews had an ulterior motive for allowing Perkins to come onto his show for the past 2000 years, spewing his hateful diatribe unchallenged, for this particular moment. And it was beautiful!

    Posted by: Gigi | May 11, 2012 9:27:14 AM

  4. Perkins should be treated the same way as a KKK mouthpiece wanting to spew his hate on BET! GLAAD obviously needs to have a quiet talk with senior executives at all the networks about why his organization - and the other homophobes' - are hate groups and deeply hurtful to millions of viewers.

    Posted by: Hue-Man | May 11, 2012 9:28:02 AM

  5. That was pretty delicious. And can someone PLEASE tell me what "Research" the Family Research Council is involved in?

    Posted by: Troy | May 11, 2012 9:31:46 AM

  6. "That was pretty delicious. And can someone PLEASE tell me what "Research" the Family Research Council is involved in?"

    They research how many bogus scary social issues they can use to shake down American families for $$$.

    Posted by: Dastius Krazitauc | May 11, 2012 9:56:08 AM

  7. Mr. Perkins keeps smiling because the whole time he is thinking how much he would enjoy being Barney's bottom b!tch.


    Posted by: AllBeefPatty | May 11, 2012 10:00:17 AM

  8. Perkins is great (read: evil) at making illogical, impractical, animus-fueled arguments sound somehow rational, however superficially. That condescending little smile is chilling; I feel like I'm watching the devil himself.

    Posted by: Rascal | May 11, 2012 10:03:23 AM

  9. I'm guessing the 50% single parent household rate in this country would be pretty surprised to find out they don't actually have a child. It seems, according to Tony, without a marriage license, children can't happen. Obviously that was the second half of the abstinence only education, and why the teen pregnancies rates exploded. "You can only have a child once you're married." Who needs a condom or the pill...just don't sign a marriage license and you're baby free. Yeeha.

    News flash to Perkins: Gays can make babies. There's nothing wrong with our biological abilities. I promise I could make babies with the best of them. Not letting us marry doesn't render us infertile. Moron.

    Posted by: Michaelandfred | May 11, 2012 10:03:53 AM

  10. Troy, the Family Research Counsel 'researches' new and improved ways to hate and discriminate against gay people. It may not be their stated mission but they certainly have shown the world that it is.

    Posted by: Hoyle McCain | May 11, 2012 10:14:08 AM

  11. i still find it infuriating that Tony Perkins talks about research and studies that suggest that kids fare better when raised by a straight rather than a gay understanding is that there are NO studies or research to prove this. The fact that he says this regularly and even here is COMPLETELY unchallenged. Its sloppy journalism to not ask a simple follow up question....

    Posted by: paul | May 11, 2012 10:14:57 AM

  12. I doubt Romney was TP's first choice as a nominee.

    Posted by: anon | May 11, 2012 10:20:07 AM

  13. I sincerely wish that Frank had addressed the spurious claim that there's any social science at all that claims that children "need a mother and a father"... they've been twisting the evidence about that for years. That social science doesn't make any such claim. It claims that children perform best in households with two loving parents... regardless of those parents' gender.

    Posted by: Adamk | May 11, 2012 10:21:13 AM

  14. Miss Tonette--she nasty!

    Posted by: Tamika | May 11, 2012 10:36:51 AM

  15. This is kind of off topic, but the phrasing "gay marriage" is starting to really bother me. Don't we just want "marriage"? I think every time we qualify it, we allow people to think in terms of separate but equal, right? The same thing goes for "gay adoption". We want "marriage equality", meaning we want the same rights as other people who are in love. I don't want my relationship qualified as a "gay marriage" while my straight friends have a "marriage". I think even changing it to "equal marriage" carries more weight. Just my thought of the day, I woke up thinking about it and was spurred on by some friends on Facebook writing of their support for gay marriage. Its just starting to seem, to me at least, that we are fighting for a qualified right.

    Posted by: JT | May 11, 2012 10:37:06 AM

  16. I watched it last night and kudos to both frank and chris mathews

    Posted by: say what | May 11, 2012 10:46:33 AM

  17. Perkins is bastardizing, BASTARDIZING, actual research that compares the development of children in single parent households vs. households with two opposite sex parents. He conveniently chooses not to mention the research DOES NOT compare children raised by two same-sex parents and therefore DRAWS NO CONCLUSION about same-sex parenting whatsoever.

    It drives me INSANE when the fuckwads that hate same-sex marriage (and would rather put all gay people in camps, whether they say it out load or not) LIE ON NATIONAL TV and claim that "the social science shows kids do better when raised by a mother and father" because that is total crap.

    Every study ever done to compare the children of gay couples with straight couples agrees that kids raised in two parent homes REGARDLESS OF THEIR PARENTS GENDER are equally well adjusted happy adults. And (not surprisingly) the kids who have gay parents freely offer that they are more open-minded as a result of their parentage.

    The real question is: WHY DOES NO ONE IN THE MEDIA CHALLENGE PERKINS LIES??? Even worse, no guest who represents the views of the gay community challenges the lies either. Why are people who are so infuriatingly ill-equipped to shine a glaring light on FRC's lies on television in the first place?


    Sorry for the caps. I get really worked up over this.

    Posted by: Semangelof | May 11, 2012 10:52:35 AM

  18. Semangelof, that's exactly what groups like Tony Perkin's do. Paul Cameron is notorious for a study that said all gay men live shorter lives basing his "study" on obituaries of people who had died of AIDS. They're all idiots and will do and say anything to get their way. That includes ALL "conservative" and republicans.

    Posted by: Bobby | May 11, 2012 11:36:09 AM

  19. Why do religious radicals get to define legal terms?

    Posted by: Sargon Bighorn | May 11, 2012 12:18:35 PM

  20. Cameron and Cameron are notorious for all their studies. One stated that children of gay parents report getting teased, which is proof that gay parents are harmful. Um, what kid doesn't get teased at some point for whatever ridiculous reason. It's like saying that a kid might be teased for having red hair, so parents with the potential to bear red-headed offspring should be sterilized.

    Posted by: TJ | May 11, 2012 1:09:50 PM

  21. @Hue-Man, I agree!

    Still no disclaimer. I would like to have heard Chris introduce him as, "Tony Perkins, president of FRC which has been designated as a Hate Group by the Southern Poverty Law Center for its anti-gay activities".

    That would be truly remarkable!

    Posted by: Richard Skolasky | May 11, 2012 1:16:05 PM

  22. @TJ

    "... so parents with the potential to bear red-headed offspring should be sterilized."

    Is this an option???


    Posted by: Rin | May 11, 2012 1:22:36 PM

  23. RIN - I sure hope not! I luvs me some ginger, male and female!

    Posted by: TJ | May 11, 2012 1:25:47 PM

  24. @TJ

    continuing in my TJ love fest. I've missed you. If you were in NYC I would love to bump into you sometime.

    Posted by: Rin | May 11, 2012 1:30:51 PM

  25. RIN - aw shucks, ma'am! Thanks for the shout out. Back at ya. It's been brutal here. I had someone ripping at me on the Romney bully thread and the Obama November election thread yesterday. The level of nasty was surprising. Who knew I could be so irritating, and inspire so much vitriol? The road to hell... But you know what that can be like.

    Posted by: TJ | May 11, 2012 1:37:49 PM

  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment


« «In Further Remarks, Romney Classmate Calls Anti-Gay Scissors Attack an Unforgettable 'Haunting Memory': VIDEO« «