Ken Cuccinelli | Lawrence O'Donnell | News | Virginia

In Amazing 'Last Word', Lawrence O'Donnell Rips Ken Cuccinelli and His War on Sex, Sodomy: VIDEO


Lawrence O'Donnell tore up Virginia attorney general and gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli in last night's 'Rewrite' on The Last Word, demanding that the anti-sodomy, anti-oral sex crusader be asked about his own sex life in upcoming debates.

"Virginia is for lovers is bullsh*t," spits O'Donnell.

Watch the jaw-dropping segment, AFTER THE JUMP...

Mediaite writes:

O’Donnell was inspired to read the law in question, and proceeded to share with his viewers exactly how horny elected officials get when they really put their minds to it. He read some very vivid and graphic legal descriptions of what sodomy is, especially the part that calls it a “crime against nature.”

But it’s not just strictly sodomy that’s out of bonds, it’s “most gay and straight sex” and sex with “any brute animal.” Cunnilingus is right out. In fact, the only type of sex that technically remains legal is heterosexual vaginal intercourse.

All of this led O’Donnell to a very important conclusion: when Cuccinelli participates in gubernatorial debates, it is completely fair and reasonable to ask him if he has ever violated that law with his wife.

Watch the jaw-dropping segment, AFTER THE JUMP...

And Buzzfeed has more on Cuccinelli's recent anti-sodomy activities:

Cuccinelli has asked the Supreme Court to take his appeal of a case against William Scott MacDonald that he lost at the appeals court in order to allow the state to use its sodomy law to prosecute MacDonald for soliciting a minor — despite the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas that sodomy laws are unconstitutional.

Cuccinelli’s defense has faced criticism due to his continued support — expressed as recently as 2009 — for the criminalization of homosexual sodomy and his opposition to updating the law to eliminate the unconstitutional law while continuing to criminalize the behavior at issue in the MacDonald case.

Rather than addressing those issues, Cuccinelli on Wednesday launched a website attacking his Democratic gubernatorial opponent, Terry McAuliffe, for “Playing Politics Instead of Protecting Our Children.”


Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. Outstanding!

    Posted by: Jack M | Jul 18, 2013 8:58:35 AM

  2. roflol....but of course if someone would ask, he'd probably lie again saying they never have acted out these unclean sexual acts.

    Posted by: zing | Jul 18, 2013 9:00:57 AM

  3. I don't dispute the fact that some people will see this as jaw-dropping, but it shouldn't be. Discussing what is literally written into public law in the actual terms written in that law should be a matter for basic reasoned adult discussion.

    He's right - most people think sodomy just means anal sex, and since "sodomite" is commonly thought to mean gay people, most people think that sodomy is only gay anal sex.

    Virginia's law mandates a year in jail for a married couple having oral sex. And their Attorney General wants it to not only stay on the books, but to be validated by the Supreme Court, in defiance of a whole body of Supreme Court rulings on everything from contraception to the Lawrence decision specifically about sodomy.

    He should be laughed at scornfully every time he tries to pretend this has anything to do with children. And if he meant it to be about children, there is a basic and straightforward way to make that happen - rewrite the law so it applies to minors only.

    Posted by: Lymis | Jul 18, 2013 9:16:02 AM

  4. I think it's a brilliant use to ask this guy these questions during his debates. Put him through a similar form of public humiliation and invasion of privacy. Something tells me this dude gas plenty of self hatred already though.

    Posted by: Munro | Jul 18, 2013 9:20:35 AM

  5. He needs a BJ!

    Posted by: pipo | Jul 18, 2013 9:40:49 AM

  6. How can an Attorney General not know about the Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas, in 2003!?! "This case does not involve minors, persons who might be injured or coerced, those who might not easily refuse consent, or public conduct or prostitution. It does involve two adults who, with full and mutual consent, engaged in sexual practices common to a homosexual lifestyle. Petitioners’ right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in private conduct without government intervention." Oyez

    Posted by: Scott | Jul 18, 2013 9:46:53 AM

  7. His cucci looks awfully nelli to me.

    Posted by: Tessie Tura | Jul 18, 2013 9:48:09 AM

  8. Ken C is just jealous because his ugly wife doesn't give him any! He's just a frustrated idiot!

    Posted by: Petero | Jul 18, 2013 9:48:49 AM

  9. Traditionally, in evangie-fundie parlance, "sodomy" has always meant any sex act that (a) varies from the "missionary position" and (b) does not result in procreation.

    Cuccinelli is a sex scandal waiting to happen.

    One hopes Cuccineeli is asked bluntly about his, um, sexual proclivities during the debates. If that Republican reprobate, Cuccinelli, feels it is his right and duty to interfere in the private sex lives of consenting adults, then it is the right of those consenting adults to question Cuccinelli about his own, allegedly private, sexual activities.

    Posted by: jamal49 | Jul 18, 2013 10:18:11 AM

  10. ... Or maybe Ken C is jealous and frustrated because his wife doesn't have a penis...

    Posted by: Paaat | Jul 18, 2013 10:19:51 AM

  11. This is the down-side of making the AG and elected position. You get ambitious politicians in the AG office who then use the courts to get populist positions credit, even if there's no chance of success. Eliot Spitzer of NY did the exact same thing while AG, with almost all his populist cases against Wall St. going down in flames after he became Gov. It's very nasty.

    KC's legal gambit can't work because the premise of the sodomy law is invalid. An invalid premise could use any reasoning since it doesn't matter. Once the core argument is removed it's circular logic. His position in court (and he knows this) is that "He's guilty because I say he's guilty".

    Posted by: anon | Jul 18, 2013 10:48:48 AM

  12. Marry me, Lawrence.

    Posted by: fedorajoe | Jul 18, 2013 10:49:16 AM

  13. There are the self-loathers like Larry Craig,Johan Paulik etc but the fact is not everyone against us is a closet case.
    A lot of them are like Cuccinelli in that they feel they have the right to impose their views on everyone else,seperation of church and state be darned.

    Posted by: Kevin | Jul 18, 2013 10:50:09 AM

  14. latest Quinipiac poll;26;&strTime=0

    Mcaulife is ahead 4 points to the couch = margin of error

    a PPP poll would be nice since they have a better track record on accuracy than even Q poll

    Posted by: Moz's | Jul 18, 2013 11:04:31 AM

  15. I love Lawrence O'Donnell. I love it when he does this.

    Posted by: db | Jul 18, 2013 11:46:43 AM

  16. So, any heterosexual who ever gave or got a blowjob is a sodomite!

    Posted by: db | Jul 18, 2013 11:48:37 AM

  17. i'm repulsed that i find ken cuccinelli so damn hot.

    Posted by: pc | Jul 18, 2013 12:29:49 PM

  18. The whole Senate, House of Representatives,Exec Branch, and judicial Branch would be put in Jail. And probably 99% of the state citizens. This makes tons of sense.

    Posted by: bructer | Jul 18, 2013 1:45:22 PM

  19. He should go to the middle east, he make a prefect Islamic Fundamentalist.

    Posted by: bructer | Jul 18, 2013 1:47:30 PM

  20. it's not surprising - you show me a raving anti-gay bigot and i'll show you a man or woman who hasn't had an orgasm in decades.

    Posted by: Little Kiwi | Jul 18, 2013 1:49:33 PM

  21. He's trying to buy his way into heaven, which means he thinks he did something really bad. I don't know if it involves other guys, a female prostitute, or a male prostitute, but there is something.

    Posted by: Mike in the tundra | Jul 18, 2013 2:05:20 PM

  22. >>So, any heterosexual who ever gave or got a blowjob is a sodomite!<<

    Of course they are! Doesn't everyone know that? Well, I don't think they do. Since the NY Times apparently thinks that Scotland is part of England, I'm not sure what to make of people's knowledge.

    Posted by: Neil | Jul 18, 2013 3:27:39 PM

  23. And if you've been following the news it appears that Cuccinelli has been on the corruption gravy train as well as the guv.

    Posted by: Joseph Singer | Jul 18, 2013 5:13:40 PM

  24. don't worry by the time they finish investigating his taking of gifts for services rendered he will really find out what sodomy really is

    Posted by: walter | Jul 18, 2013 5:22:12 PM

  25. I love Lawrence O'Donnell!!!!

    Posted by: Scott | Jul 18, 2013 6:29:42 PM

  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment


« «Poll: 50 Percent of Virginia Voters Support Same-Sex Marriage« «