Sen. Barbara Boxer Sends Letter to Vladimir Putin, Slams Russian Anti-Gay Laws

BoxerIn a letter sent to Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) blasted Russia's anti-gay 'propaganda' ban and urged the country to repeal its laws and policies infringing upon the rights of LGBT individuals. Boxer, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee that oversees human rights, said Putin's anti-gay regime has become an "affront to fundamental principles of equality."

From the letter:

"I support a strong United States-Russia bilateral relationship and believe we must work to strengthen this important relationship whenever possible. However, I cannot stay silent while your country works to put in place deeply discriminatory laws and polices undermining the rights of LGBT individuals, which have already had tangible and dangerous consequences. I have been shocked by images of Russian LGBT individuals – including young men and women – being harassed threatened and severely beaten. If these laws and policies are not repealed, the consequences for human life and human dignity could get even worse.

Furthermore, I am deeply concerned about the significant detrimental impact of these laws on the Winter Olympic Games that Russia is scheduled to host next year. The United States – like many other countries – will be sending both LGBT athletes and spectators to the Games. I firmly expect Russia to support the Charter of the Olympic Games, which refers to sport as a human right that should be practiced without 'discrimination of any kind.' Any attempt at discrimination will be met with significant protest and will leave a dark stain on Russia's international image for decades to come."

Those protests, however, may hit a roadblock if Putin has his way. Earlier today, we reported on Putin issuing a decree banning all "meetings, rallies, demonstrations, marches and pickets" before and during the Sochi Olympics.  

Comments

  1. Will says

    Good for her!!

    I can’t imagine anybody who had plans to go (athletes included), isn’t disgusted beyond belief and the new “terrorist” law Putin issued today and still has any inkling to go, don’t!

    Listen to your gut. You are not safe. The IOC will not protect you.

    Boycott everything Russia. It’s not a party if no one shows up.

  2. GB says

    Will: Boxer should send an e-mail. Snowden can intercept it. Cursive is out. Who said this was a party? Disgust “beyond belief?” Oh my! My “gut” says all will go off as usual. You can’t function without something to fear can you? That’s the underlying issue.

  3. Bill says

    @CB: not true. According to
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_8#Political_figures_2

    “The U.S. House Speaker, California Representative (8th District), Nancy Pelosi[99] along with other members of the California congressional delegation and both of California’s U.S. senators, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, voiced their opposition to Proposition 8″

    The article cited http://ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=3320 (a bay area gay publication), which mentioned that Barbar Boxer had opposed Prop 8 a month before Feinstein did. There was a link for Pelosi to her web page, but that link no longer works (no surprise given that the issue is mute).

  4. says

    @Bill, I should have been more specific. Sen. Dianne Feinstein made a commercial against Prop 8 (albeit only a couple weeks before the election), however, the other two very prominent Washington legislators Sen. Boxer and Speaker of the House Rep. Pelosi remained silent. They may have voiced some sort of support, through interviews, but when it came to full-fledged media support, especially in such a controversial measure, they remained out of the limelight.

  5. Bill says

    @CB: In 1996, Nancy Pelosi voted against DOMA, and has received a 100% rating from the HRC (see her wikipedia page). She issued a statement supporting the California Supreme Court’s pre-Proposition-8 decision allowing same sex marriage and she issued statements opposing Proposition 8. She may have been in a similar position to Barbara Boxer regarding TV ads, but of course has a far smaller campaign budget than a senator.

    According to a 2008 article in The Advocate
    ( http://www.advocate.com/news/2008/11/05/barbara-boxer-marriage-fight-not-over?page=full ): ‘Boxer said she did not appear in TV ads that urged voters to vote no on Prop. 8, like fellow Californian U.S. senator Dianne Feinstein did, because she was not asked. “The campaign asked me to do certain things, send e-mails, do calls,” she said. “I did whatever they asked me. I would have done anything.”’

    Just because you saw a politician in a commercial does not mean they paid for it. The group opposing Proposition Eight was cash strapped for a while at a critical point before the election (I went to a fund raiser and heard that from people working on the campaign). By the time they caught up, it was late enough that they simply might not have had enough lead time to place ads for more than one prominent politician.

  6. Bill says

    @CB: I just posted a comment and it apparently was lost. I’m not going to bother trying again, but will refer you to http://www.advocate.com/news/2008/11/05/barbara-boxer-marriage-fight-not-over?page=full where she said she didn’t produce a video because she wasn’t asked to by the group running the campaign against Proposition Eight.

    Nancy Pelosi might have been in a similar situation.

    Keep in mind that none of them might have been able to pay for an ad directly – there are a series of complicated rules regarding what you can do with campaign contributions.

  7. Bill says

    Hmmm. Now the first message I sent showed up but the second seems to have evaporated. Possibly the server is slow and is queuing the messages so you don’t see an immediate indication of them being posted.

  8. Goodcarver says

    @BILL: all three of your messages show, in case you need confirmation of them having gone thru. Very interesting and cogent comment. I hope this helps.

  9. dean says

    There’s nothing better than watching Paid Trolls cower and flee when FACTS are presented to them.

    Take a hike, moron DB and Anon.

    You can continue and lie to yourselves all you want…

    BUT WE GOT FACTS ON OUR SIDE.

    Which makes you two intellectually impotent.

  10. Onnyjay says

    Thanks, Barb, but you’re appealing on the wrong level. Pootsie clearly is using Russians’ deep-seated homophobia to manipulate public opinion for his own purposes — holding on to power — and doesn’t give a rat’s rear bumper about world opinion on the issue.

Leave A Reply