Comments

  1. Paul R says

    The oxygen-carbon clip was beautifully done, but unforunately it sacrificed aesthetics over information. Showing the same two clips simultaneously twice was not as useful as integrating them—and even adding some voiceover—could have been.

    It’s a visually appealing, multilingual (or, more accurately, non-lingual) representation of important processes. But it could be more educational, because the main take-away is, So carbon and oxygen are involved in a lot of processes and activities that involve or affect us all. But we already knew that…so what?

Leave A Reply