• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Travel
  • Sports
  • Law/Justice
  • Celebrities
  • Film/TV/Stream
  • Republicans
  • Madonna
  • Books
  • Men
  • Trans Rights
  • Tech/Science
  • Royals
  • Monkeypox

Prop 8 Proponents May Not Have Power to Appeal Judge’s Ruling

Andy Towle August 9, 2010

View more news videos at: http://www.nbclosangeles.com/video.

As the nation awaits Judge Vaughn Walker's decision on the stay he placed on his ruling striking down Proposition 8, developments since that stay was placed, such as the filing Friday of briefs by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown, suggest that the state continues to have little interest in defending the discriminatory Prop 8 measure in the courts.

Could this mean the case stops here? Perhaps.

Davidson  Jon Davidson explains to LGBT POV:

While many legal analysts thought that Judge Walker was likely to grant the stay pending appeal, Friday’s filings have dramatically changed the likelihood of that.

The standards for when a stay or a trial court’s order pending appeal are well-settled. In order to be entitled to such a stay, the party seeking the stay has to make a “strong showing” that the party is likely to succeed on the merits of the appeal and also has to show that that party will be irreparably injured if there is no stay. In addition, courts consider whether the issuance of a stay will substantially injure other parties and where the public interest lies.

Normally, it is the party ordered to do or not do something that seeks a stay. This is an unusual situation, however, because the parties whom Judge Walker ordered not to enforce Proposition 8 have asked him not to stay his order while the appeal proceeds.

This seems to suggest that Walker will lift the stay, and same-sex couples will be allowed to begin marrying. And several legal experts are suggesting that without a government interest in defending Proposition 8 in an appeal, the proponents of Prop 8 no longer have the power to appeal the case.

Davidson continues:

So far, the government-defendants in the case have not appealed. Given what they have said in their oppositions to the stay request, it seems likely that they will not. If that happens, there will be a legal question of whether, when those who are ordered to do something don’t appeal, someone not ordered to do anything has any right to appeal. To understand this, one has to appreciate a few things about federal courts.

Federal courts can only hear cases where there is what’s called a “case or controversy.” They can’t issue advisory opinions about issues just because parties may have an abstract dispute with one another. Rather, in order to be able to pursue an appeal, a party has the burden of showing that it has “a direct stake in the outcome” and has been injured by the ruling in a concrete manner that is particularized to that party and different from citizens at large who may not like the judge’s ruling.

New York Law School Professor Arthur Leonard seems to agree:

So where does this leave us? A strong indication from the Supreme Court that initiative proponents whose efforts result in the enactment of laws or constitutional amendments generally do not have standing to participate as parties in subsequent litigation concerning their constitutionality, and are even less likely to be found to have standing to appeal an adverse ruling on constitutionality if the state, itself, decides not to appeal. Although the Supreme Court refrained from actually ruling on the question in the Arizona case, it certainly signaled a disposition against finding standing in such a situation.

Whether the 9th Circuit will construe things that way when it is called to rule on the Proponents' appeal of Judge Walker's decision is uncertain, as is the question whether the Supreme Court would extend its reasoning in the Arizona English case to cover this situation. But it is certainly a plausible argument that a decision by the governor and attorney general may mean that the case stops here.

On the one hand, that would be fortunate for those who want to marry in California. On the other hand, it means that Judge Walker's decision remains merely a trial court ruling and order, with no precedential authority beyond the state of California. For those who think that Walker's very persuasive decision can survive appellate review, this may seem like a lost opportunity to achieve a regional (9th Circuit) or nationwide precedent that could then be used to attack similar amendments in more than 30 states.

So what happens if the case simply stops here, and never makes it to the Supreme Court?

Leonard: "Whether the 9th Circuit will construe things that way when it is called to rule on the Proponents' appeal of Judge Walker's decision is uncertain, as is the question whether the Supreme Court would extend its reasoning in the Arizona English case to cover this situation. But it is certainly a plausible argument that a decision by the governor and attorney general may mean that the case stops here. On the one hand, that would be fortunate for those who want to marry in California. On the other hand, it means that Judge Walker's decision remains merely a trial court ruling and order, with no precedential authority beyond the state of California. For those who think that Walker's very persuasive decision can survive appellate review, this may seem like a lost opportunity to achieve a regional (9th Circuit) or nationwide precedent that could then be used to attack similar amendments in more than 30 states."

It's important to note that this is all conjecture at this point. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. Both articles cited above are worth reading in full:

Can the Proponents of Proposition 8 Appeal Judge Walker's Ruling? [leonard link]
Lambda Legal’s Jon Davidson Explains What’s Next: Judge Walker’s Stay of His Prop 8 Ruling, Timeline For Appeals and More [lgbt pov]

Watch Jon Davidson on KNBC's news conference from Sunday morning, AFTER THE JUMP…

Topics: News, Supreme Court More Posts About: Federal Prop 8 Trial, gay marriage, News, proposition 8

Related Posts
  • Former Roommate Indicted For Murder Of Florida LGBTQ Activist Jorge Diaz-Johnston, One of the Public Faces In State Fight For Marriage Equality
  • Russia Blocks Facebook, Accusing it of Restricting Access to Russian Media;
  • Survivor Benefits Payments For Same-Sex Partners Are Being Paid Under Biden, But Many Don’t Even Know They Qualify
  • Chris Pratt Called Out! Actor’s ‘Not Religious’ Claim Debunked After Spilling About Church & Faith For Years

    Chris Pratt Called Out! Actor’s ‘Not Religious’ Claim Debunked After Spilling About Church & Faith For Years

    Published by Radar Online Mega Chris Prattshocked the world when he came out and denied going to Hillsong church or being religious altogether after catching flak for going to an anti-LGBTQ establishment — but now, after …Read More »
  • Baz Luhrmann is turning Australia into new series Faraway Downs

    Baz Luhrmann is turning Australia into new series Faraway Downs

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Baz Luhrmann is turning ‘Australia’ into a six-part series. The 59-year-old filmmaker has officially revealed his 2008 epic adventure film – which starred Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman – will be …Read More »
  • WHO warns ‘sustained transmission’ of monkeypox risks vulnerable groups

    WHO warns ‘sustained transmission’ of monkeypox risks vulnerable groups

    Published by Reuters LONDON (Reuters) – The World Health Organization said “sustained transmission” of monkeypox worldwide could see the virus begin to move into high-risk groups, like pregnant women, immunocompromised people and children. WHO said on …Read More »
  • U.S. Supreme Court expands state power over tribes in win for Oklahoma

    U.S. Supreme Court expands state power over tribes in win for Oklahoma

    Published by Reuters By Lawrence Hurley WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday widened the power of states over Native American tribes and undercut its own 2020 ruling that had expanded Native American tribal authority …Read More »
Previous Post: « Watch: Alveda King Speaks At NOM Event In Atlanta
Next Post: Tim Tebow: Focus on the Friar »

Primary Sidebar

News

  • California beachfront property to return to Black family

    California beachfront property to return to Black family

  • Four takeaways from the sixth day of Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol riot hearings

    Four takeaways from the sixth day of Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol riot hearings

  • Trump wanted to join Jan. 6 Capitol riot, tried to grab limo steering wheel

    Trump wanted to join Jan. 6 Capitol riot, tried to grab limo steering wheel

RSS Partner Links

  • OMG, quote of the day: Chris Pratt says he’s actually not a religious person, attempts to clear the air on online backlash
  • Cassidy Hutchinson, 25, Finishes Off Trump? + Monkeypox Info + Gay Roommate Search + Gorsuch's Mom Sucked, Too + MORE! — 12-PACK
  • Meghan Markle Wants Samantha Markle’s Defamation Lawsuit Dismissed
  • Travis Barker Was Hospitalized For An Unidentified Medical Emergency
  • Wednesday Round-Up: Dan Jervis; Brittney Griner; Jim Obergefell; John Waters; Pedro Almodóvar; Ricky Martin & more!
  • What Ronen Rubinstein would say to his younger self: “It’s okay to feel what you feel”
  • Wrestle Wednesday

Most Recent

  • Biden Administration Outlines Monkeypox Strategy, Including Increased Testing, Vaccination And Community Education

    Biden Administration Outlines Monkeypox Strategy, Including Increased Testing, Vaccination And Community Education

  • Chris Pratt Called Out! Actor’s ‘Not Religious’ Claim Debunked After Spilling About Church & Faith For Years

    Chris Pratt Called Out! Actor’s ‘Not Religious’ Claim Debunked After Spilling About Church & Faith For Years

  • Baz Luhrmann is turning Australia into new series Faraway Downs

    Baz Luhrmann is turning Australia into new series Faraway Downs

  • WHO warns ‘sustained transmission’ of monkeypox risks vulnerable groups

    WHO warns ‘sustained transmission’ of monkeypox risks vulnerable groups

  • U.S. Supreme Court expands state power over tribes in win for Oklahoma

    U.S. Supreme Court expands state power over tribes in win for Oklahoma

  • Ginni Thomas’ lawyer wants to know what Jan. 6 probe wants from his client

    Ginni Thomas’ lawyer wants to know what Jan. 6 probe wants from his client

  • U.S. steps up fight against monkeypox, allocates more vaccines to states

    U.S. steps up fight against monkeypox, allocates more vaccines to states

  • Ethan Hawke and Pedro Pascal cast in Strange Way of Life

    Ethan Hawke and Pedro Pascal cast in Strange Way of Life

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy
[towleroadmr] [towleroadtn]

Footer

Copyright © 2022 · Log in