« Rearview Mirror: Looking Back at the Week on Towleroad |
Main
| "Deep Disappointment" from Experts as Merck AIDS Vaccine Fails »
09/24/2007
A Little Gyllenhaal to Start your Week
Jake Gyllenhaal is featured in this month's Interview magazine. More shots after the jump...
Looking like quite the outdoorsman.
Posted 7:53 AM EST by Andy Towle in Jake Gyllenhaal, Magazines, News | Permalink
Like it?
Subscribe to FREE Towleroad daily headlines with our RSS feed!
RECENT STORIES:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I can aleady see the stalkery roster of comments now that are gonna get posted here....
Posted by: Jake | Sep 24, 2007 8:21:29 AM
I like Jake a lot but I'm getting tired of hearing about him and even (gasp) seeing his face. Is he getting overexposed, or is it just me? Oh well at least this item isn't another one about Beckham.
Posted by: phil | Sep 24, 2007 8:32:16 AM
Yes phil
very overexposed
Posted by: Jimmyboyo | Sep 24, 2007 8:39:02 AM
Phil,
I hate to write it, but (double gasp) I think I'm starting to feel the same way! But I do really like these pictures. Sigh....
Posted by: Greggie | Sep 24, 2007 8:42:02 AM
Ugh, yes - overexposed.
These contrived shots of outdoor activities are lame, too.
Posted by: Warren | Sep 24, 2007 8:51:50 AM
How is Jake overexposed? This is one interview about his upcoming movie. He was in Toronto for the film festival for his movie. So Andy posted a picture of him at the US Open. Is he supposed to hide and not go anywhere or do anything? He isn't on TV or on every magazine cover. Whatever, I will haoppily take "overexposed" Jake in these pictures. I also look forward to the interview with David Fincher that is in the mag.
Posted by: What | Sep 24, 2007 9:00:02 AM
Overexposed? Yeah, a little.
Tiresome? No.
Super super hot? Yeah.
Nice thing to see first thing on a Monday?
You betcha.
Posted by: Brian | Sep 24, 2007 9:06:29 AM
^^ should be "happily"
Posted by: What | Sep 24, 2007 9:06:39 AM
Jesus Christ guys... you can't be serious? Getting tired of seeing Jake's face? Over-exposed! Yeah, right!! If Jake were ever to "expose" himself, you guys would be drooling at the bit to get even a small piece of his ass! He's just a totally hot guy. Period. Look, I guarantee you if you get some beers into Gyllenhall he'll let you blow him, are more! (Personally I'd love to rim his from now til Kingdom come...)... Let's keep some perspective here, guys! And while I know it's not ALL ABOUT SEX... let's face it some more... THIS DUDE IS SO SENSUAL AND SEXY... well, it's hard not to think of the sex.
Posted by: Dan Cobb | Sep 24, 2007 9:11:28 AM
And one more thing... Jake is going to be a REALLY hot older guy too... this dude is going to be sexy well into his 60's... so I'm just giving you guys the heads-up.
[Man, would I ever LOVE to blow him! ]
Posted by: Dan Cobb | Sep 24, 2007 9:20:11 AM
Um, when was the last time Jake did a magazine cover? Last year and it was on one magazine. And when was he interviewed by director David Fincher? Never. So I don't consider this overexposed at all. Thanks Andy for these pics and I look forward to the David Fincher/JG interview.
Posted by: TS | Sep 24, 2007 9:24:34 AM
Hahahah...see my originally comment.
Thanks for totally creeping us out Dan Cobb
Posted by: Jake | Sep 24, 2007 9:24:38 AM
Watched Brokeback Mountain again last night. Love him. He and the film were robbed at the Oscars.
Posted by: secretagentman | Sep 24, 2007 9:34:47 AM
Overexposed as in everytime the dude farts he gets his pic plastered across the internet.
Posted by: Jimmyboyo | Sep 24, 2007 9:36:24 AM
HOT! DAMN!
Posted by: Allen | Sep 24, 2007 9:46:18 AM
Jimmyboyo, but that isn't his fault. It's not like he does things like coming out of clubs drunk ,etc. He goes about his life like anyone else. He is only "overexposed" if you read gossip sites. So I don't get the bitchiness about him in this thread. His press is only when he has to promote a movie like he is doing now for "Rendition". Can't help that the internet is obsessed with everything celebs do.
ITA, Secretagentman
Posted by: What | Sep 24, 2007 9:47:58 AM
I loves me some Jake too. Perhaps he's not over-exposed anywhere but here... not that I'M complaining.
Posted by: BusyTimmy | Sep 24, 2007 9:49:49 AM
I'm way in the minority here, but I've never seen Jake as THE HOTTEST MAN IN THE WORLD like so many do, he's ok, but there are better looking guys out there, IMO.
Posted by: Ron | Sep 24, 2007 10:07:22 AM
I'm way in the minority here, but I've never seen Jake as THE HOTTEST MAN IN THE WORLD like so many do, he's ok, but there are better looking guys out there, IMO.
Posted by: Ron | Sep 24, 2007 10:09:09 AM
Guys dont freak out at the overexposed comments. They are just acting out page 125 of the Guide to Being Gay Handbook: "Wait till a goodlooking, talented celebrity's popularity becomes predictable, then start tearing him down."
After all, it's passe to be attracted to Jake. It's so much more exciting to be the guy who is SOOOOO over him.
Posted by: mark m | Sep 24, 2007 10:17:33 AM
Okay, Jake just made up for a calendar year with ZERO shirtless shots by giving us some pit.
Posted by: jeff | Sep 24, 2007 10:21:38 AM
I wouldn't call it overexposed but perhaps, orange-exposed.
This is either the worst photo scan I have ever seen, or Jake went batshit crazy with some self tanner. I've loved him since "October Sky" and will love him until they film the Brokeback prequel: "Escape From Tight Fitting Bluejeans Mountain." And P.S. ladies stop fighting over Jake, you're all beautiful, like a rainbow. And Jake is the orange stripe.
Posted by: Joe Fitrzyk | Sep 24, 2007 10:31:38 AM
thank you, Mark M,
it seems there always has to be some tragically, hip queer being so-over this or that, as if being blase' is a virtue. in truth, it is simply tiresome.
jake is a handsome, sexy, friend of gays. period. i don't mind seeing pix of him anytime, even if my saying so makes me sound "stalkery". (is that even a word?)
Posted by: nic | Sep 24, 2007 10:47:22 AM
Wow - we never get to see Jake here on Towleroad! Haha.
Can an argument be made that this guy is even that talented? I can think of 2 - possibly 3 - films where his performances were adequate, and that includes his Oscar nominated role in Brokeback, a solid, if somewhat creepy, acting job in a well made, but wildly overpraised film (gay guilt by mainstream critics), Fincher's 'Zodiac' and maybe 'Donnie Darko' (Jake's character, let's face it, could have been portrayed by anyone).
Andy - he needs to ditch his management pronto and hire you full-time! There's no greater promotion for him than your site!
Posted by: jeffreychrist | Sep 24, 2007 11:59:17 AM
I don't think it has anything to do with a 'hip queer' stance... Some people just find Gyllenhaal unattractive and/or untalented.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's different strokes for different folks out here in the real world.
Posted by: Kyle | Sep 24, 2007 12:41:41 PM