News: Geology, Mr. Blackwell, Pageants, Clay Aiken, Montauk
John Edwards admits affair, says he lied during campaign.
Condoleezza Rice undermines McCain arguments, says U.S. would be safe with Obama: "Oh, the United States will be fine. I think that we are having an important debate about how we keep the country safe. I think we are having an important debate about our responsibilities, our obligations, our interests in the Middle East in the wake of the now increasing evidence of success in Iraq. Those are important judgments for the American people to make."
Settled: The "Monster" that washed up on the beach last week in Montauk, NY was a viral marketing campaign.
At 8:08 on 08/08/08: Singer Clay Aiken is a proud father.
Log Cabin Republicans launch Republicans Against Prop. 8"...Scott Schmidt: "Marriage is a personal decision. It's not up to the long arm of the government of when, where and whom you should get married to."
Sting goes shirtless for the final show of The Police in New York City.
Radar on the unsung heroes of the child beauty pageant circuit: gay men.
Wingnut Randy Thomasson warns against horrors of 'Harvey Milk Day': "This will harm children as young [sic] kindergarten. Every May 22, AB 2567 will positively portray to children homosexual experimentation, homosexual 'marriages,' sex-change operations, and anything else that's 'in the closet.' Governor Schwarzenegger should say no to this very inappropriate bill, which has nothing to do with academic excellence."
Quentin Tarantino signs Brad Pitt for World War II action-drama Inglorious Bastards: "The 44-year-old actor will play a Southern rebel who assembles a team of eight prisoners-turned-soldiers to battle the Nazis."
Group compiling dynamic first-of-its-kind map of Earth's geology.
Connecticut man attempts murder to end gay rumors.
Diva in polka dots: Elton John makes splash in Saint-Tropez.
Fashion critic Mr. Blackwell hospitalized, emerges from coma.
Canadian border agents confiscate laptop over gay porn: "While the gay men watched, a CBSA agent sat in their truck and poked through the contents of the laptop. When he ran into locked material, he got the passwords from them. Rick and Shawn say that, in retrospect, it was a slapdash search. The laptop was combed, but not their cell phones, Shawn's Blackberry, or the loose burned CDs in the truck's glove compartment. The CBSA officers went into their office. Time ticked by as Rick and Shawn pondered what to do next. About an hour later, a CBSA officer came back with bad news. 'He came back and said 'We're going to have to confiscate the laptop.' I asked why. He said it had 'questionable material,'' says Rick."
BLOCKED: Fred Phelps' Westboro Baptist Church also held up at Canadian border.
must have been some hot stuff on that laptop for the canadian customs to want it for themselves... did they confiscate the lube too? ... well they're gonna need it...
Posted by: the queen | Aug 8, 2008 2:43:41 PM
I know that I argued earlier in the week that gay men tend to have more right brain talents, but I truly wish that advancing beauty queens wasn't among them.
Posted by: Paul R | Aug 8, 2008 3:01:27 PM
While I find child beauty pageants to be pretty ridiculous, to each his own I guess. Still can't see the attraction gay men could have for such a thing.
Bummer about the customs thing. But that article about the Westboro Church being refused entry made me happy. "Keep your hate out of my Canada". Classic.
Posted by: Jude | Aug 8, 2008 3:28:00 PM
- Is it sentimental and gullible on my part to have begun feeling kind of sorry for Condi Rice?
- I will always be a sucker for a good monster hoax -- Nessie, Bigfoot, or Montauk monster, I blithely suspend my disbelief in them all. Is this what's going on with my belief in Condi's conscience? Hm.
- Perhaps similarly, I kind of love Clay Aiken now. Closeted or not, his freak-flag is indisputably up and flying.
- Sting looks decent enough, but Stuart Townsend looks like a lady librarian all sweaty after her lunchtime jog. By which I mean ... I'd hit it.
- Child beauty pageants ... Jesus Christ, GROSS, Andy.
- lolling that the cops came back "about an hour later" from the little room they disappeared into with the porn.
Posted by: thin mint | Aug 8, 2008 3:49:32 PM
The border service agency is fully aware of the fact that watersports and fisting are both legal now and considered non-obscene but they still go by outdated regulations and any thing they deem obsene is cause for inspection. Idiots! As the couple warns, if you got a laptop with "questionable" material, just leave it at home. Not worth the risk of being flagged while travelling through the States.
Posted by: Shabaka | Aug 8, 2008 3:51:42 PM
Can you imagine what a great comedy movie idea it would be to follow the life a gay man who coaches little beauty contestants.
Yeah, yeah, I know what y'all are saying, "what's new with that stereotype, Derrick?"
How well the script is written, directed, and the acting, that's what.
It would be a great part...maybe for that guy on "Ugly Betty"...what's his name? Vanessa Williams' sidekick, him. Or maybe Isaiah Washington could do it! That would be great!
Posted by: Derrick from Philly | Aug 8, 2008 3:54:55 PM
Congrats to Clay on becoming a dad. No matter how they did it. I have always been a fan of Clay, and will continue to love his voice. I still think that he is GAY, but he has a right to live his life the way he wants to. I do not care how many people don't like him, i love Clay. At least they gave their child a normal name. That moron Nicole Kidman and that idiot named their child Sunday Roast, what the HELL is that about? Have these people lost their damned minds??? That child is going to catch nothing but hell, all her life. When i think of a Sunday roast, i think of a nice Chuck roast with collard greens, sweet potatos and corn bread, and all the rest of it, not someone's name. Honestly, some people with all that money, are losing their BLOODY minds. Oh well...love ya Clay.
Posted by: SONNIE | Aug 8, 2008 3:57:09 PM
U.S. border agents given power to seize travellers' laptops, cellphones
Last Updated: Friday, August 1, 2008 | 3:33 PM ET
CBC News
U.S. authorities now have the power to seize and detain travellers' electronic devices, including laptops and cellphones, and make copies of their contents at an off-site location, under newly disclosed customs policies.
The policy gives border agents at any point of entry into the United States the authority to also take documents, books, pamphlets and hard drives. The items can be seized from anyone crossing the border and may then be copied and shared with other government agencies, according to Department of Homeland Security documents dated July 16.
"Officers may detain documents and electronic devices, or copies thereof, for a reasonable period of time to perform a thorough border search," the policy says. "The search may take place on-site or at an off-site location."
U.S. Senator Russ Feingold told the Washington Post he finds the new policies "alarming" and said he plans to introduce legislation that would make grounds for border searches more rigorous.
Greg Nojeim, senior counsel at the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Democracy and Technology, said the new policies allow authorities to conduct searches without suspicion of wrongdoing.
"They're saying they can rifle through all the information in a traveller's laptop without having a smidgen of evidence that the traveller is breaking the law," he told the Post.
If the authorities find there is not probable cause to hold the seized items, copies must be destroyed, according to the policy. The policy does not outline a timeframe in which materials must be returned.
"These examinations are part of ... long-standing practice and are essential to uncovering vital law-enforcement information," the policy says, noting examinations help authorities detect possible instances of terrorism, narcotics smuggling, child pornography and violations of copyright and trademark laws.
Posted by: Nick | Aug 8, 2008 3:59:10 PM
http://www.dailytech.com/US+Border+Patrol+Gains+Power+to+Seize+iPods+Laptops/article12562.htm
The Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement may be place by the end of 2008
DailyTech was among the first to break news of the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. The international agreement, to which details were being ironed out, would demand investment in large policing organizations to "bust" those who download and share music and movies.
The bill was well received at the G8 meeting, the meeting of the world's largest economic superpowers which takes place each July. The G8 published a document entitled "Declaration on the World Economy". The document contains a section "Protection of Intellectual Property Rights", which contains the following update on the status of the ACTA legislation:
We encourage the acceleration of negotiations to establish a new international legal framework, ACTA, and seek to complete the negotiation by the end of this year.
Thus it appears that ACTA may be set in place by the end of the year. The new policy allows random warrantless search and seizures at the border. Under ACTA, border patrol agents will be able to seize peoples’ laptops, iPods, and other electronics which they suspect contain illegally-obtained media. If the border patrol thinks they've found such media on the devices, they are authorized to destroy them at their discretion.
The law may affect many due to the heavy prevalence of file sharing and other forms of copyright infringement in the U.S. What may surprise some, however, is that such seizure provisions are already in place albeit in a different form.
Recently released information reveals that the Department of Homeland Security has been granted the power to without any suspicion of wrongdoing seize travelers’ "device(s) capable of storing information in digital or analog form," including “hard drives, flash drives, cell phones, iPods, pagers, beepers, and video and audio tapes" as well as "all papers and other written documentation." After seizure, the materials may be taken off site. The contents of the laptops can then be shared with other agencies and/or private entities for language translation, data decryption or other reasons.
The policies were apparently put in place July 16 by two DHS agencies: U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. They have existed in a similar, but undocumented form previously. Interestingly, while the policy contains provisions to protect business information and attorney-client privileged material, they have no provisions to protect personal medical records or other personal data like financial records.
Privacy advocacy groups are outraged and considering legal action. "They're saying they can rifle through all the information in a traveler's laptop without having a smidgen of evidence that the traveler is breaking the law," said Greg Nojeim, senior counsel at the Center for Democracy and Technology.
Some in the U.S. government are condemning the privileges and demanding a probe into whether the government is using its power to abuse citizens’ rights. They argue that just cause, one of the foundations of the U.S. government is being trampled. "The policies . . . are truly alarming," said Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.).
Sen. Feingold will soon be proposing legislation to require reasonable suspicion at border searches and ban profiling based on race, religion or national origin, which is thought to occur.
On the other side of the fence is the Department of Homeland Security which argues that the measures are necessary to protect against terrorism. Customs Deputy Commissioner Jayson P. Ahern stated that the policies "do not infringe on Americans' privacy." He argues that the policy predates the war on terror, stating that the government has long had "plenary authority to conduct routine searches and seizures at the border without probable cause or a warrant" to prevent drug traffic and transportation of other contraband.
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff voiced his opinions in support of the bill in a strongly worded editorial in USA Today, in which he says that the searches have "violent jihadist materials" as well as child porn. He also argues that "the most dangerous contraband is often contained in laptop computers or other electronic devices."
He says unfortunately, travelers themselves cannot be detained without suspicion, stating that "as a practical matter, travelers only go to secondary [for a more thorough examination] when there is some level of suspicion." He, however, warned, "Yet legislation locking in a particular standard for searches would have a dangerous, chilling effect as officers' often split-second assessments are second-guessed."
Those looking to challenge the policies in court will have a tough road ahead. The seizures without suspicion were upheld in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco, setting a legal precedent.
Posted by: Nick | Aug 8, 2008 4:01:51 PM
Sort of like "Best in Show" except with children instead of dogs?
Posted by: thin mint | Aug 8, 2008 4:04:17 PM
We've been saying for years now that the 4th amendment no longer exists. ^^There's the proof. A clearly unconstitutional search and seizure, and the pant-pissing cowards applaud as each new measure is more draconian than the last. Hopefully the next president will halt this descent into fascism.
Posted by: Nick | Aug 8, 2008 4:04:56 PM
What's even more terrifying to me about the computer confiscation is that it was done by CANADIAN border officers. I'd never heard about Canadian border agents searching a Canadian's laptops before; I'd always thought individuals weren't targeted in this way by Canada Customs. I'm freaked out!
Posted by: seeldee | Aug 8, 2008 4:59:52 PM
If you don't want your computers, books, cell phones etc. confiscated or searched, just make sure you fly in on a private plane. Preferably one belonging to good US allies and Bush family friends like the Saudi royal family.
A lot of people overlook the part in that directive which says that it excludes rich people and political cronies.
Posted by: paul | Aug 8, 2008 5:40:28 PM
Some of those Westboro people have reportedly already entered our country.
I hope they do show up and they get people power justice.
If I were there, I'd slam their fucking faces into the cement and be a PROUD Canadian for doing so.
They are nasty fucking cunts!
Posted by: Marc | Aug 8, 2008 6:09:01 PM
OK, gay men who help turn little girls into beauty contest winners are not heroes at all. They're just other grown ups, like the parents of the children, who devalue and damage vulnerable little girls by forcing the children to become obsessed with their looks.
There's a difference between playing dress up and being dressed up by adults to look like mini-adults and then forced to perform like trained seals for adult approval. A five year old should or a seven year old should not have her value as a human being determined by how great she looks with make up plastered on her face. (Hey, have you read the reports about how toxic most make up is?)
Just because someone is gay doesn't make him wonderful. Sometimes a gay adult is just another jerk pushing sexist crap that hurts children.
Heroes? Try villains who need to get different jobs.
Posted by: noah | Aug 8, 2008 9:10:46 PM
Actually, the Montauk monster was a dead raccoon.
Check it out:
http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2008/08/the_montauk_monster.php
I think you assumed too much when you read the article you linked to, they hardly claimed it was settled. Perhaps a better bullet line would be "Settled? The "Monster" that washed up on the beach last week in Montauk, NY might have been a viral marketing campaign."
Posted by: Eric | Aug 9, 2008 1:38:00 AM
"Log Cabin Republicans launch Republicans Against Prop. 8"...Scott Schmidt:"... Republicans against proposition 8"? "Interesting typo," says Freud.
Posted by: Michael | Aug 9, 2008 10:17:08 AM
Serbia & Montenegro on Anti- Counterfieting LAws & EU Standards When traveling
throughout Serbia & Montenegro in August for three weeks vacation.
United States :
Serbia & Montenegro on Anti- Counterfieting LAws & EU Standards
When traveling throughout Serbia & Montenegro in August 1999 for three weeks
vacation. I also found Serbia & Montenegro banks to be 100% in accordance with EU
anti-counterfeiting laws & guidelines.
In fact, as an American citizen with a United States Passport, I had an extremely difficult
time when attempting to walk into any bank to exchange my United States Dollars into
either Serbian Dinars and/or Euros. When exchanging money on my vacation, all bills
(U.S. Dollars) had to be crisp and dry, without one tear or crease; I was always asked at
all banks throughout my travels in Serbia & Montenegro to present them with more than
two forms of official photo ID for transactions. When I asked them why, the bank
representatives todl me they have to be extremely careful of counterfeit bills.
In fact, I was starving one day with some friends by the Kosovo border and one bank
would not even exchange my United States Dollars into Euros at all! We were about 10
meters outside of Kosovo where western media was committing gross lies about hundreds
of thousands of refugees being homeless by the borders of ALbanian and Kosovo. I saw
noy one person anywhere insofar as refugees and/or homeless people during my trip in
mid-August 2002.
Yet here I was, in a small ethnic majority Albanian town...anyway, back to my story...
I had been swimming earlier in the morning and had gotten all my money wet. Yet here I
was, an American citizen and even 10 meters outside of Kosovo, not one Montengrin
bank would easily exchange my US Dollars into Euros because it was a bit damp.
And I was hungry!
They would not even exchange it when I showed them my United States valid Passport
along with additional forms of Identification. Talk about banks being overly cautious!
Since it has become a private joke of sorts between myself and my friends what we had to
go back to our hotel rooms often and actually blow-dry our money; almost taking an iron
to iron it perfectly dry, before any bank in either Serbia or Montenegro would exchange
our currency (no matter how much I whined).
WHEN I EXPLAINED TO THE BANK TELLERS THAT I WAS VERY HUNGRY AND
NEEDED TO EXCHANGE MONEYS TO BUY LUNCH, AND, ASKED THEM WHY
ALL THIS ATTENTION TO MONEY EXCHANGES OF VERY SMALL AMOUNTS
UNDER $50- EVEN, I WAS TOLD BECAUSE OF THEIR COUNTRY’S VERY
STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF ANTI-COUNTERFEITING LAWS.
SO WHEREFORE SHOULD NOT SERBIA AT ONCE GAIN ACCEPTANCE IN THE
EU?
INSOFAR AS WAR CRIMES, AS A PERSON WHOM IN AUGUST 2002
TRAVERSED FROM THE SERBIAN/CROATIAN ADRIATIC BORDER TO 10
METERS FROM KOSOVO/MONTENEGRIAN BORDER, I DID NOT SEE ANYONE
ALBANIAN, SERB AND/OR ROMA NOR ANY REFUGEES IN THE COUNTRY
ANYWHERE AT ALL.
EVEN IN THE ETHNIC ALBANIAN TOWN WHERE I BROUGHT MY FRIEND’S
WIFE TO AN ALBANIAN DENTIST AS A SERBIAN LADY FOR DENTAL CARE,
ALL SCHOOL CHILDREN WERE WELL FED, VERY WELL DRESSED AND THEY
WALKED UP TO ME (I TOLD THEM I WAS A US POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENT
AND AMERICAN CITIZEN AND THEY DIDN’T SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT
SERBS AT ALL.) THEY ONLY ALL TOLD ME THEY WANTED TO STUDY IN NEW
YORK ONE DAY. BUT AFTER I TOLD THEM ABOUT MY TERRIBLE
EXPERIENCE BEING THROWN OUT OF THE NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL
RESEARCH IN MANHATTAN FOR MY ANTI NATO VIEWS, THEY TOLD ME
PERHAPS THEY WERE WRONG ABOUT THINKING THERE WAS TRULY
ACADEMIC FREEDOM ON THE USA.
THEN I TOLD THE ETHNIC ALBANIAN STUDENTS NOT TO STUDY IN NEW
YORK CITY BECAUSE OF HOW I ALSO WAS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BY
FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON AND SETON HALL AS WELL ON ACCOUNT OF THE
NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH’S VIOLATING MY DISABILITY
RIGHTS.
WE DISCUSSED HOW THE NEW SCHOOL DID NOT LIKE MY STRONGLY
VOCALIZING MY ANTI-NATO VIEWS TOO AND HOW FDU WOULD NOT
ACCEPT MY MA THESIS WELL.
DURING MY TRIP I DISCOVERED THE AMERICAN AND WESTERN EUROPEAN
NEWS MEDIA WAS LYING TO THEIR PUBLIC LISTENERS.
I MYSELF COULD NOT LOCATE ONE REFUGEE ANYWHERE IN EITHER
COUNTRY , EVEN 10 METERS OUTSIDE OF KOSOVO ITSELF, I FOUND NOT
ONE ETHNIC TENSION AND PEOPLE FROM ALL PARTS OF EUROPE WERE
STAYING IN BUDVA MONTENEGRO WITH ME (GERMANY, NETHERLANDS
ETC.) WE WERE ALL EQUALLY ENJOYING OUR VACATION. THE MAN AT OUR
HOTEL FROM GERMAN PLAYED SOME CHESS WITH ME.
JILL STARR IN NJ
PS: NO ONE RAN UP TO ME FROM ANY ETHNIC NATIONALITY IN ANY ONE
PLACE CRYING TO ME ABOUT WAR CRIMES AND RAPE.
SINCE THAT TIME OF MY 2002 VACATION IN SRBIA AND MONTENEGRO, I
HAVE PERSONALLY ALSO MET WITH SEVERAL UNITED STATES MARINES
STATIONED IN PRISTINA DURING THAT TIME RECENTLY SPENDING TIME
IN NEW JERSEY. THEY ALSO TOLD ME “I WAS NOT REALLY LOOKING JILL
BUT I DID NOT SEE ONE REFUGEES MYSELF AND I WAS STATIONED IN
PRISTINA IN KOSOVO –AND YES THE US AND WESTERN MEDIA MADE UP
SOME OF THE LARGEST LIES IN THE WORLD AND LIES AGAINST SERBIA
AND MONTENEGRO..” THIS WAS SAID TO ME ABOUT 3 WEEKS AGO BY A
SHERIFF’S OFFICER IN PASSAIC COUNTY NEW JERSEY IN 2006.
JLS
Posted by lpcyusa at 5:57 PM 0 comments
http://erbiamontenegro.blogspot.com/
http://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/jillstarrinternationalnewshttp://sites.google.com/
http://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/
http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/
http://obamavideos.bottmer.com/i-am-a-witness-in-the-icc-war-crimes-trials-
10047.barack
http://lpcyu.instablogs.com/feed
http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa
Posted by: jill starr | May 7, 2009 7:29:05 PM
'''Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case By Jill Starr
http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa
(The Documentary Secret United Nations ICC Meeting Papers Scanned Images)
https://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/irrefutable-proof-icty-is-corrupt-court-irrefutable-proof-the-hague-court-cannot-legitimately-prosecute-karadzic-case
This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr Karadzic and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.
Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United Nations member states having a substantial conversations, and, openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan Karazdic and others.
I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding.
Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country’s proposal was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly believes if we contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that ought to give us and other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its decisions.”
((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of censoring the country representative from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery for international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a ”totally legitimate topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked! The idea was “let’s discuss it.” "It’s a great topic to discuss."
Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did not. The point here is, bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally legitimate topic instead of an illegitimate topic which it is in the meeting that I attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent international criminal court.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
In particular., since “Spain” was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and verdicts in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, “Spain” must have already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was “socially acceptable” for conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing the ICTY and ICC before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student.
SPAIN’s diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is, disgusting morally!SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.”
I represented the state interests’ of the Former Yugoslavia, in Diplomat Darko Trifunovic’s absence in those meetings and I am proud to undertake this effort on Serbia’s behalf.
==================================================================================
What It’s Like to Chill Out With Whom the Rest of the World Considers As The Most Ruthless Men: Ratko Mladic, Goran Hadzic and Radovan Karadzic (+) Confessions of a Female War Crimes Investigator By Jill Louise Starr NJ USA
https://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/what-it-s-like-to-chill-out-with-whom-the-rest-of-the-world-considers-as-the-most-ruthless-men-in-the-world-ratko-mladic-and-radovan-karadzic-confessions-of-a-female-war-crimes-investigator
Retrospectively, it was all so simple, natural and matter of fact being on a boat restaurant in Belgrade, sitting with, laughing, drinking a two hundred bottle of wine and chatting about war and peace while Ratko Mladic held my hand. Mladic, a man considered the world’s most ruthless war criminal since Adolf Hitler, still at large and currently having a five million dollar bounty on his head for genocide by the international community. Yet there I was with my two best friends at the time, a former Serbian diplomat, his wife, and Ratko Mladic just chilling. There was no security, nothing you’d ordinarily expect in such circumstances. Referring to himself merely as, Sharko; this is the story of it all came about.
Posted by: Jill Starr | Jan 25, 2011 12:49:30 AM