Anglican church | London | Louisiana | News | Religion

BigGayDeal.com

London Chaplain: Tattoo Gays with Sodomy Warnings

Mullen

Reverend Peter Mullen, the Chaplain to the London Stock Exchange, is under fire for suggesting that gays be branded with sodomy warning tattoos:

Said Mullen: "It is time that religious believers began to recommend ... discouragements of homosexual practices after the style of warnings on cigarette packets. Let us make it obligatory for homosexuals to have their backsides tattooed with the slogan 'SODOMY CAN SERIOUSLY DAMAGE YOUR HEALTH' and their chins with 'FELLATIO KILLS'."

Mullen also called for the banning of gay pride parades, and wrote a poem mocking the recent blessing of the union of two gay priests by Reverend Martin Dudley.

The Evening Standard reports: "The poem begins: 'The Bishop of London is in a high huff, Because Dr Dudley has married a puff; And not just one puff - he's married another: Two priests, two puffs and either to other.' The ceremony, which took place in the summer, was roundly condemned by the Bishop of London, the Rt Rev Richard Chartres, as a breach of Church of England rules."

The Bishop of London called Mullen's marks "highly offensive" and gay rights group Stonewall UK is calling for Mullen's resignation.

Gay men should have sodomy warning tattoos [evening standard]

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. Another douche bag who is as ugly on the inside as he is out. Did he star in the Phantom of the Opera?

    Posted by: patrick nyc | Oct 6, 2008 12:59:27 PM


  2. He needs a tattoo across his bulbous, shiny forehead that says: MAY FUCK YOUR KIDS

    Posted by: crispy | Oct 6, 2008 1:05:44 PM


  3. Looks as if he already bears the mark of the beast on his face. What a monster!

    Posted by: Bojo | Oct 6, 2008 1:05:48 PM


  4. How come his face has two different colors in it?!

    Posted by: Philip Wester | Oct 6, 2008 1:08:56 PM


  5. Ewww.... i woud be pissed if i was repressed and was ugly in and out...I'VE SAID THIS BEFORE.....THERE ARE PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO LOVE HITTLER AND WOULD LOVE TO HAVE ANOTHER CONCENTRATION AND MASACRE....THESE PEOPLE DON'T LEARN. I hope people realize this and throw him out...HIPOCRITE BASTARD!~

    Posted by: bosie | Oct 6, 2008 1:10:28 PM


  6. Crispy beat me to it !! Great minds and all that ...

    But we had exactly the same thought -- according to his logic all Priests would be labeled as Sex Offenders and a danger to be around children.

    If you haven't seen Bill Maher's Religulous -- go see it!

    Its high time religion was relegated to mythology status.

    Posted by: Chapeau | Oct 6, 2008 1:17:12 PM


  7. Note to Reverend Douchebag. You might want to remove the mote that destroyed your left eye first.

    Posted by: christopher | Oct 6, 2008 1:21:58 PM


  8. Poor little man, his soul missing, and his brain, well, whatever is inside in his head, so pathetic. The sad part for us, there's this kind of people in power positions.

    Posted by: Carlos | Oct 6, 2008 1:24:14 PM


  9. The Rev. Mullen is also the parish priest at St. Micheal's Cornhill. The families with gay members must love him there too. I've posted the website and his email address in case anyone was looking for them.

    http://www.st-michaels.org.uk

    Rev. Mullen's e-mail address:

    [email protected]

    Posted by: Ed | Oct 6, 2008 1:25:08 PM


  10. Is it conceivable he was joking as he seems to be saying? I doubt it.

    I say we tatoo "douchebag" in rainbow colors across his forehead. Apparently, thinking can be bad for one's health.

    Posted by: Ted | Oct 6, 2008 1:26:18 PM


  11. Ugly inside and Ugly outside. Typical.
    "Another Christian IDIOT" should be the tat across his deformed face. He's scary.

    Posted by: SFshawn | Oct 6, 2008 1:31:23 PM


  12. well i for one certainly agree that being a fag can be dangerous to one's health... i've certainly had a few close calls in my time... but i dunno about the tattoos... maybe something like those stickers you see on bread in the supermarkets...

    Posted by: the queen | Oct 6, 2008 1:33:29 PM


  13. Not a particularly good poet either.

    Posted by: David D. | Oct 6, 2008 1:35:24 PM


  14. He looks kinda like Sloth from The Goonies.

    Posted by: Jason (A) | Oct 6, 2008 1:49:27 PM


  15. The blog has now been taken down, but Google's cache shows the offending article to be thus:
    --------------------

    Matthew Parris

    Matthew Parris is wilfully refusing to give his readers his opinion about the recent "gay wedding" and about relationships between the church and homosexuals generally. He says, "When it comes to the church, synagogue or mosque, if you think the whole thing ridiculous, its hard to get excited about the ridiculousness of a subset of it. I should feel the same if morris dancers or the British Astrological Society tried to exclude gays."

    So, for Parris, the views of billions of Christians, Jews and Muslims worldwide are of no more consequence than a couple of obscure sectional interests. From what point of privileged judgement does he thus discount 4000 years of civilisation? The great world religions have survived the criticisms of far more intelligent and better informed opponents than the ignorant upstart Parris. There is a whole history and literature of distinguished apologetics for religious belief, but Parris will attend to none of it - sufficient only to attract his disdain is mainstream religion's disapproval of homosexual acts.

    Since Parris will not dirty his hands by entering theological discussions with his readers, perhaps I might answer for religious believers in the purely utilitarian terms which even the lofty Parris is bound to engage with. We disapprove of homosexuality because it is clearly unnatural, a perversion and corruption of natural instincts and affections, and because it is a cause of fatal disease. The AIDS pandemic was originally caused by promiscuous homosexual behaviour. Such promiscuity is itself an evil because its perpetrators merely use others indiscriminately for their own gratification, treating their fellows as sex objects and as means to an end rather than as ends in themselves. I should have thought that Parris, having rejected religious belief, might want to construct his moral beliefs on this Kantian humanistic imperative. But I suspect he is not really interested in morality of any kind - except as a special plea to excuse his lust for gratification at whatever cost to human dignity and the sanctity of human life.

    It is time that religious believers began to recommend specific utilitarian discouragements of homosexual practices after the style of warnings on cigarette packets: Let us make it obligatory for homosexuals to have their backsides tattooed with the slogan SODOMY CAN SERIOUSLY DAMAGE YOUR HEALTH and their chins with FELLATIO KILLS. In addition the obscene "gay pride" parades and carnivals should be banned for they give rise to passive corruption, comparable to passive smoking. Young people forced to witness these excrescences are corrupted by them.

    Let me continue the comparison with smoking which is banned in most public places. Those committing homosexual acts in public places - such behaviour being a crime in any case under the Homosexual Reform Act of 1967 - should be arrested, tried and punished. Parks, open spaces and public lavatories would at once become more wholesome places. There ought to be teaching films shown in sex education classes in all our schools. These would portray acts of sodomy and the soundtrack would reinforce the message that it is a filthy practice ending with the admonition: "We do, after all, know the importance of washing our hands after going to the lavatory."

    But I should like to turn Parris' disdain for religion back on to him. If I consider that homosexual practices are vile, why should I concern myself with subsets of their aspects? I might as well concern myself with other minor irrelevancies such as the Doris Day fanclub and polo-neck sweaters

    Posted by: Graham Anderson | Oct 6, 2008 1:53:09 PM


  16. Gone are the days I respond directly to idiots who espouse violence toward gays. I just make sure I'm always prepared for anyone who thinks they might want to harm me for any reason. I certainly wouldn't go down quietly.

    Posted by: David T | Oct 6, 2008 2:00:48 PM


  17. David T: More gay men should think like you.

    Posted by: elg | Oct 6, 2008 2:20:00 PM


  18. Ditto, David T.

    Even Matthew Shepherd didn't go down without a fight...he fought like hell to the end.

    Posted by: Bojo | Oct 6, 2008 2:50:00 PM


  19. Who let this freak out of the belltower?

    Yet another so-called religious person who seems to be dripping with evil, completely without the slightest regard for human dignity or decency toward his fellow man.

    I wonder why Bill Maher passed this douchebag over in Religulous.

    Posted by: LD | Oct 6, 2008 3:16:29 PM


  20. "under fire"
    Ha!
    ...no you didn't. It's clearly a skin graft from a serious burn.

    Posted by: JeffRob | Oct 6, 2008 3:45:46 PM


  21. You would hope that someone who has lived with a facial disfigurement would appreciate the value of tolerance. But no - the wonky faced little godbotherer.

    Posted by: DD | Oct 6, 2008 3:47:23 PM


  22. From one Brit to another "Reverend" Peter Mullen is a prat....and he has now made that clear to London, the UK and the rest of the world.

    Posted by: EvilEuropean | Oct 6, 2008 4:36:18 PM


  23. I have a large pink triangle tattooed on my left wrist and keep it visible at all times - is that good enough?

    Organized religion IS the hell on Earth and the source of ALL HATE AND PAIN! - nutbag bitch!

    Posted by: David B. | Oct 6, 2008 4:50:46 PM


  24. hmmm... I really don't think this is what Nathaniel Hawthorne was thinking about in 1850... then again... I bet if this crackpot insisted and deemed it mandatory to have a Scarlet Letter tattooed onto the foreheads of any straights found cheating on their partners - he'd be stoned to death in a town square! And while I'm at it, I love the way "they" insist that "they" must save the 'institution" of marriage - why blame gays for that? Hell, ban divorce! Make it illegal for married couples to get divorced - and if they break the law - tattoo them as well! IMHO...

    Posted by: Stephen | Oct 6, 2008 4:50:58 PM


  25. Let us remember what those many commentators and print pundits who shamelessly wept public tears at the death this past February of slithery-tongued neo fascist William F. Buckley, Jr., chose not to: that he suggested some quarter century ago—in the "New York Times," in fact—that "Everyone detected with AIDS should be tattooed in the upper forearm to prevent common needle users, and on the buttocks, to prevent the victimization of homosexuals.” As IF he carried about

    Lest anyone think he'd later mellowed, just three years ago he wrote with the sophomoric affectation that most confused with eloquence:

    "Someone, 20 years ago, suggested a discreet tattoo the site of which would alert the prospective partner to the danger of proceeding as had been planned. But the author of the idea was treated as though he had been schooled in Buchenwald, and the idea was not widely considered, but maybe it is up now for reconsideration."

    Too late to reward Herr Buckley, but, in my devotion to the Old Testament, might I humbly suggest that Rev. Mullin be clubbed to death like a baby seal?

    Posted by: Leland Frances | Oct 6, 2008 4:59:12 PM


  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «Kristen Wiig and her Petite, Ladylike Hands« «