Ann Coulter | Don't Ask, Don't Tell | FOX News | Greg Gutfeld | Military | News

Watch: Ann Coulter, Greg Gutfeld Mock Gays in the Military


Ann Coulter's piehole holds forth on 'DADT' repeal:

"People who are promoting this could not care less about the military. They would like to destroy the military and so it's a win-win for them, either it works, which it won't, or it doesn't work and 'yay the military is wrecked. When we're putting girls and gays in the military we are not taking the military seriously."

Coulter further wonders why there can't be a gay division of the military, where they can stay with their ice sculptures and Liza Minnelli, and such...


Feed This post's comment feed


  1. As she becomes increasingly shrill she simply becomes more irrelevant. It's not hard to get booked on Fox News, so she's preaching to the choir. I don't care what she and others like her say as they expose the uber-right as the bigots they are. As for Ann Coulter, she would never have the courage to fight in a war. Bullies are always the biggest sissies.

    Posted by: LAXJFK | Dec 24, 2010 11:03:48 AM

  2. GOProud will host a cocktail party with her headlining it in 5...4..3...2...

    Posted by: | Dec 24, 2010 11:10:57 AM

  3. Who is the guy on the right side of the screen, the man moderating the people around the table? He seemed to be a voice of reason. I'd never seen him (not that I watch Faux Noise).

    Posted by: DougChgo | Dec 24, 2010 11:14:04 AM

  4. It's all an act, really.

    Posted by: anon | Dec 24, 2010 11:23:30 AM

  5. I figured it out (thank you, Mr. Google!) -- he's Andy Levy, RedEye's "ombudsman" -- okay ...

    Posted by: DougChgo | Dec 24, 2010 11:25:52 AM

  6. Blah-blah-blah.. It's done - they can yap all they want.

    Posted by: Igor | Dec 24, 2010 11:33:33 AM

  7. Now that it is done, I guess' we'll have to defend it. I'm fairly certain the right is going to hang any future military setbacks on any gay soldier they can find within three thousand miles of the engagement.

    Posted by: Suffern ACE | Dec 24, 2010 11:41:23 AM

  8. She needs to make money for the holidays she is out doing what she does best....trying to get the media to pay attention to her. I didn't even watch the video....ignoring this idiot is the worst thing you could do for her! Next!

    Posted by: Eric | Dec 24, 2010 11:46:23 AM

  9. Oh, Ann... Failure on your part is not pretty! Failure, failure, failure!!!

    Posted by: Jim | Dec 24, 2010 11:48:10 AM


    Posted by: Jim | Dec 24, 2010 11:49:46 AM

  11. The next thing I want to read about Ann Coulter is her obituary.

    Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Dec 24, 2010 11:52:31 AM

  12. Doesn't she have a Christmas tree in Who-ville to steal?

    Posted by: bobbyjoe | Dec 24, 2010 11:52:59 AM

  13. How do you spell Ann Coulter - C - U - N - T

    Posted by: PDxblueyes | Dec 24, 2010 11:53:43 AM

  14. The tragedy of this woman is that I don't get that she really believes what she's saying. It's the way she makes her living; the way many of these wing-nuts make their living, from Maggie Gallagher on down. Six and seven figure incomes are difficult to ignore.

    To me, this brazen cynicism is much worse than their actually believing the crap they spout. I can deal with sincerity. But when people do such enormous damage for no other reason than to increase their bank accounts, you have to consider how incredible empty and morally void they are. They'll lose in the end, just like all the other hate spewing pundits that have come before them. Sad, stupid sons of bitches.

    Posted by: The Atlantian | Dec 24, 2010 12:08:25 PM

  15. Interesting with the repubs win in the House of Reps, suddenly some moderate repubs have decided to cross the aisle and ignore the extremists. I think the loudmouths have run their course, and demographics are not in their favor. Expect to see a lot more whining as they continue to fail.

    Can't run that vid as Coulter makes me go blind. BTW, are we absulutely sure that isn't an adam's apple?

    Posted by: romeo | Dec 24, 2010 12:12:41 PM

  16. I've heard Ann Coulter over local radio in LA interviewed by her close friend, gay conservative talk-host John Phillips. This woman has diarrhea of the mouth and loves to hear herself talk. Sycophants like Phillips find her hate speech "entertaining" and have nothing but contempt for the legitimacy of the goals and achievements made by gays in recent years. The less attention paid to such people, that better it is for all of us.

    Posted by: radiojock | Dec 24, 2010 12:32:35 PM

  17. I feel like even clicking on the video gives her too much attention; I don't want to add to it's view count. For me, it's like Palin - I can't stand the sound of words passing he lips.

    I agree with many of the above commments - it's a tiresome act for the converted and on this issue its best to just ignore her.

    Posted by: princely54 | Dec 24, 2010 12:49:55 PM

  18. I think what she is trying to say - although in a not very nice way, is that you have a bunch of people who have no idea about the military experience telling the military what it should do.

    Over the past thirty years or so in this country we have been fed over and over again about diversity above anything else. Diversity is the new religion. The "awesome sanctimony of diversity." Everything needs to be diverse and everything should include a certain amount of every kind of people and if it is not diverse it is bad.

    But in some situations diversity does not fly. In the army you are expected to wear the same uniform. The armed forces actually go out of their way to break people down and build them back up again. You are to work as a group, you follow orders, discipline and respect for authority come first. The safety of the group comes before the individual. You have to work fast and work together and be on the same page.

    And I think that is what she is trying to say.

    Though we have much more diversity in this country than we used to, less and less people are on the same page. And not just "white tea partiers" against everyone else. There are plenty of Latin immigrants and Muslim immigrants who have their own agendas as well. Every special interest grop has their own priorities that come before anyone else.

    And in the army that does not fly. I am for gays serving in the military. but just know that your identity is now part of group that comes before anything else. And the army is tough and brutal, Always has been, always will.

    Look - I am for fairness but not before common sense. If a woman firefighter can do the job with as much physical strength as a man - fine. Let her do it. but the fact remains women do not have as much upper body strength as men. So I still want a male firefighter to rescue me at the end of the day.

    And I think in the army that kind of thought process does not work.

    Posted by: Tell It Like It Is | Dec 24, 2010 1:04:17 PM

  19. Go crawl back up her ass, "Tell It Like It Is"

    Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Dec 24, 2010 1:08:30 PM

  20. Ann, you are so boring and predictable. Your shtick is old and so are you.

    Posted by: matt | Dec 24, 2010 1:21:52 PM

  21. Why is speech like this allowed? We wouldn't allow a commenter to talk about the need to increase the watermelon budget if we continue to allow blacks to serve because that is clearly offensive, yet equally ridiculous stereotypes about gay people are somehow OK? We have a long way to go still...

    Posted by: Derrick | Dec 24, 2010 1:23:09 PM

  22. "And in the army that does not fly. I am for gays serving in the military. but just know that your identity is now part of group that comes before anything else. And the army is tough and brutal, Always has been, always will."

    What point are you trying to make, exactly?

    Do you think you'll see an influx of gays joining the military, only to be shocked and want to leave because it doesn't match their expectations?

    More gays joining isn't really the practical effect of ending DADT though. The measurable effect will be to change the dynamic for existing gay service members. There is the hope that gay people will now weigh the military in the context of other possible life choices of course, but the primary effect will be to put gay service members on a level playing field. And there's really no 'common sense' argument for not doing so.

    Posted by: Zach | Dec 24, 2010 1:27:40 PM

  23. Tell it as it is.....


    Have you just ignored EVERYTHING that Choi et al have said????? Have you been sleeping under a rock when all towleroad did was post snippets from gays STILL serving in the army but who had to hide their identity???


    Gays ARE serving in the military! Gays ARE firefighters.

    Dude do you really think all the people on the blog who read or comment here are all hairdressers? Are you serious?

    Posted by: Rowan | Dec 24, 2010 1:29:38 PM

  24. the woman has an adam's apple. what other equipment is she hiding? her next role should be on ru paul's drag race. with that hair and face she/he could be a contender.

    Posted by: walter | Dec 24, 2010 1:35:14 PM

  25. I second DERRICK's comment. We are bearly out of the starting gate if this exemplifies acceptible (televised) speech. She is an angry, self-loathing person who is better suited to ranting from a street corner. No, I don't believe she is acting.

    Posted by: VinceB | Dec 24, 2010 1:39:06 PM

Post a comment


« «Movies: Best LGBT Characters of the Film Year« «