CPAC | Evangelical Christians | Evangelicals | Gay Marriage | News | Proposition 8

BigGayDeal.com

CPAC Speaker Mocks 'Ninth Circus' for Prop 8 Ruling, Says Christians Need to Be Aggressive: VIDEO

Blom

At a CPAC panel today called "The Role of Faith, Life, & Family in Our Culture & the 2012 Elections", Executive Director of the American Principles Project Andy Blom told attendees that Christians don't want to be mean and that's why gays are incrementally gaining the right to be married, Right Wing Watch reports.

Blom said Christians need to step up and be more aggressive.

Watch, AFTER THE JUMP...

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. More aggressive? They already are raging lunatics. To be more aggressive, they'd have to resort to outright violence as their standard tactic

    Posted by: Steve | Feb 10, 2012 11:41:19 AM


  2. Don't want to be mean?

    These people are waging a 24-hour-a-day war on gay people and they don't want to be mean? They force innocent teenagers to kill themselves and they don't want to be mean? They spend millions of dollars every year to deny gay people equal status as American citizens and they don't want to be mean?

    So this is what, nice?

    Posted by: Trev | Feb 10, 2012 11:51:16 AM


  3. Jesus wept.

    Posted by: S.C. | Feb 10, 2012 11:56:18 AM


  4. Wow, so is he saying we should not have let gay people visit their partners in a hospital because that is leading to Gay Marriage ? Read the sermon on the mount buddy. The guy you pretend to worship most likely would want you to focus on other issues. How about spending those millions on feeding the poor or at least send more of your own children to college... Making marriage inequality one of your main focuses is such a bad witness.


    Posted by: Tom in long beach | Feb 10, 2012 12:06:36 PM


  5. These CPAC Christians sound awfully like extremist Muslisms, don't they?

    Posted by: jason | Feb 10, 2012 12:19:04 PM


  6. I am genuinely worried that the "christian" H8ers will become more violent and there'll be a few more Matthew Shepherd murders unless these so-called followers of Christ can actually understand exactly what it means to be christian.

    Posted by: Todd | Feb 10, 2012 12:35:14 PM


  7. No, they'd like to be mean, they just think they should be mean in a nice kinda way.

    Posted by: anon | Feb 10, 2012 12:39:31 PM


  8. Cannot continue to compromise? Hahahahahahaha!

    Posted by: Zlick | Feb 10, 2012 12:49:32 PM


  9. Someone smarter than me pointed out that since they cannot get the votes by touting Romney's Almost-Obama past that they are going to try and solidify their base with fear-based insanity like this. Trouble is, times, and people, have changed.

    Posted by: greg | Feb 10, 2012 12:53:30 PM


  10. Zlick, by 'compromise', they mean not loading us in boxcars bound for the ovens.

    Posted by: S.C. | Feb 10, 2012 12:54:29 PM


  11. "hey, you know what Christians? everything's started going downhill for us when we stopped burning heretics..."

    Posted by: Little Kiwi | Feb 10, 2012 1:00:50 PM


  12. The Meeting of the American Taliban...

    Posted by: tonnedd | Feb 10, 2012 1:17:35 PM


  13. Actually, Todd....I hope they do become violent because that will alienate and marginalize them, the very thing they're trying to do to us. People of their ilk have already started committing acts of violence and murder beginning with the bombing and killing of people working at abortion clinics. These are the same people. They're all a bunch of sociopaths and psychopaths who shouldn't be free roaming the streets in civilized society.

    This is religious extremism at its worst. They are not so far removed from middle east jihadists, virtually identical.

    Posted by: Robert in NYC | Feb 10, 2012 1:18:56 PM


  14. I have three words for them: I dare you. This lovely little tactic of theirs is already backfiring on them. The more extreme they get the bigger the backlash will be.

    Posted by: MT | Feb 10, 2012 1:21:50 PM


  15. Don't be afraid of these extremists.
    He wants to oppose hospital visitation?
    Go ahead and try - first you need to win back the presidency since allowing such visits was made a federal regulation for a hospitals dealing with medicare (nearly all of them) a while back.
    More hate-mongering will make them lose faster as it turns off most people - their hateful; statements can also be used against them in the various court cases---just as the 9th circuit did with Prop 8-- to show their real "animus".
    In sum.....Bring it, douchebags.

    Posted by: Hunter Pastare | Feb 10, 2012 1:46:46 PM


  16. Hatred is not, NOT a Christian Value however Justice, Love, and faith are. Therefore the true Christians need to stand up to these conservative bullies and proclaim marriage and love are sacred and all should be treated equally as we are created equally by God.

    Posted by: Rev. Joseph Shore-Goss | Feb 10, 2012 1:57:22 PM


  17. Once again, when an election year comes up, the Republican platform is about the "THREE G's" God, Guns and Gays. I've said it before and I'll say it again... The Romans had it right, throw the Christians to the LIONS! There is NOTHING Christian about these hateful, HATEFUL people.
    @ Hunter Pastare... you're right. BRING IT ON, DOUCHEBAGS!

    Posted by: Jeff R. | Feb 10, 2012 1:58:14 PM


  18. Dammit I'm so tired of this crap every time a presidential election year rolls around...make us homos the wedge issue for the crazy religious fundies. How about THIS time we make THEM the wedge issue? Why don't the majority of Americans rise up against those who ultimately would have us living in a religious state?

    Posted by: jim | Feb 10, 2012 2:12:23 PM


  19. AGGRESSIVE?? I think he meant MORE AGGRESSIVE!!!

    Posted by: ACe | Feb 10, 2012 2:28:39 PM


  20. Okay, so is *now* when they finally get out the brown shirts, armbands, and truncheons?

    Posted by: WulfW | Feb 10, 2012 2:33:13 PM


  21. I think he meant to say more REGRESSIVE.
    Is it possible?

    Posted by: SFshawn | Feb 10, 2012 3:27:45 PM


  22. How can you respect anything someone says when they immediately turn to name calling, or even name calling at any point of a debate.

    Posted by: Garst | Feb 10, 2012 5:15:47 PM


  23. Not every braying jackass needs to be answered...

    Posted by: ted | Feb 10, 2012 9:45:04 PM


Post a comment







Trending


« «Gay North Dakota Couple of More Than 20 Years Denied Marriage License: VIDEO« «