Gay Media | News

BigGayDeal.com

OUT Magazine Lays Off Entire Editorial Staff; Editor Plans on Hiring Some Back Under His Own Employ

OUT magazine has laid off its entire editorial staff and its owner Here Media plans to contract the creation of the publication to a new company, Grand Editorial, that has been formed by its editor, Aaron Hicklin, Capital NY reports:

OutcoverHicklin told Capital there will be no reduction in the frequency of the magazine or other major changes to the content. "This was not a cost-cutting measure," he said.

He said he'd been hatching plans to launch Grand for awhile. Having spent six years running Out, he informed Here that he was forming a new venture, a custom-content shop that would work on projects like producing magazines for corporate clients, he said.

"Most" of the 12 editorial employees at OUT will receive contracts according to Hicklin, but Capital NY reports that many are skeptical:

Hicklin said he doesn't have any outside investors and that revenue at this point will be project-based, a prospect that has been met with gentle skepticism from some Out staffers: Here Media has had problems paying its freelancers and vendors over the past several years. There is an outstanding fraud lawsuit, meanwhile, against Regent.

Reached by phone, a company spokesman said the executive handling the Out arrangement was not immediately available for comment.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. Who reads magazines anymore? If it's not on the blogs, e-zines or Facebook, I don't see it.

    Posted by: GayListDaily.com | Apr 18, 2012 2:22:45 PM


  2. Hmmm, not the kind of action that inspires loyalty in your workforce. (at least at face value)

    Print media is still active, and grabbing a magazine off my table takes less time than looking it up online and finding content. And I don't have to worry about; my battery draining, screen dimming, entering passwords for 'premium content', dropping a $2K laptop,...

    Posted by: iowan | Apr 18, 2012 2:30:19 PM


  3. I used to work in gay media and I'm proud of the progress we made with national advertisers marketing to the gay audience; we helped bring gay into mainstream.

    Alas, all magazines are in hard times. I don't agree with the prior comment, however, that blogs are the only communication medium. There's something satisfying about holding print in your hand. Like books, I hope they don't go away. Radio didn't replace books, TV didn't replace radio, and internet won't replace print. They're different from each other and the world has room for all of them.

    Jim

    Posted by: Greenman47 | Apr 18, 2012 2:36:22 PM


  4. "I don't have to worry about; my battery draining, screen dimming, entering passwords for 'premium content', dropping a $2K laptop,..."

    Wow, you must have a crappy computer.

    Posted by: endo | Apr 18, 2012 2:45:36 PM


  5. Iowan: Dude, it's not 1995 anymore.

    Posted by: Winston | Apr 18, 2012 2:48:24 PM


  6. Nobody cares. This isn't 1997, sneakily trying to see hot gay things in the back of a Barns & Noble.

    Posted by: Fenrox | Apr 18, 2012 2:50:24 PM


  7. Does no one here know how magazines work? The editorial staff produces the content that also goes on the digital version of the magazine, blog, and sometimes social media. So it's not about it folding or being a print magazine. With the new company they won't have to provide salaries or benefits because it will be on a contract basis.

    Posted by: TyN | Apr 18, 2012 2:59:28 PM


  8. TYN is absolutely right; this is about cutting costs on salary and benefits. It's sad, really. I'd say I'd stop buying OUT because of it, but OUT has been pretty lousy for a while now... which is the real reason why it's in so much trouble, IMO.

    Posted by: R | Apr 18, 2012 3:12:34 PM


  9. "but not full-time salaries or benefits. (They will be contracted freelancers.)"

    How very nice and sleazy of Hicklin-- offering a job that finds a way around providing health benefits. Such a brave stand for a gay company to sink to the level of other moneygrubbing weasels. Such progress. I guess he doesn't bother keeping up with minor issues like healthcare in the US.

    If Out warranted more than a 3-minute thumb-through I might be more upset.

    Posted by: thunderboltfan | Apr 18, 2012 3:23:47 PM


  10. First off, they were FIRED; I hate the euphemisms like 'laid off', 'let go', etc.

    It's all about not wanting to pay the salaries, benefits the fired staff had, and probably just a convenient way of getting rid of a few.

    Does it 'save' money for the company? Could it be accurately described as 'cost-cutting'? IMO, no, because the money 'saved' likely will just go into others pockets, not primarily to bring down debt or re-invest in the company.

    Posted by: ratbastard | Apr 18, 2012 3:41:38 PM


  11. LOL....reminds me of this skit from In Living Color

    [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zTYpS6HQcs]

    Posted by: ratbastard | Apr 18, 2012 3:50:22 PM


  12. Sorry, ignore last post, wrong forum

    Posted by: ratbastard | Apr 18, 2012 3:52:25 PM


  13. Aaron Hicklin has proven himself to be the kiss of death for Out. Before he was hired as editor, Out was a fun, sexy and unpretentious magazine that would reliably include at least one thought-provoking article. Now it's just a dull collection of things to buy and pointless interviews with obscure celebrities, along with poorly conceived fashion spreads featuring ugly models and ugly clothes (with the sole exception of last year's Out 100 issue, which was awesome). Hicklin's the one person they should have fired, and unfortunately the only one still standing. I'll be canceling my subscription today.

    Posted by: Dan | Apr 18, 2012 11:30:39 PM


  14. Boring, boring, boring magazine that only appeals to a very narrow section of the gay community. I'm not surprised it's failing

    Posted by: Brad | Apr 19, 2012 1:00:56 AM


  15. Imagine how boring the rag will be when they start printing press releases as news stories, like all "contract"-staff publications. They'll also have recipes, fashion tips, obesity warnings, workout advice, and a column of advice for the lovelorn. Y-a-w-n !

    Posted by: wimsy | Apr 19, 2012 9:36:52 AM


  16. Imagine how boring the mag will be when they start publishing press releases as news stories, like all "contract"-staffed publications. They'll also have recipes, a horoscope, fashion tips, dieting advice, and a "Dear Abby" column for the lovelorn. Y-a-w-n !

    Posted by: wimsy | Apr 19, 2012 9:41:20 AM


  17. I stopped reading OUT a long time ago. I just couldn't see subscribing to a magazine that was that shallow. On the rare occasion that I pick it up I discover I can read everything of interest in a few minutes--why pay for that?

    Posted by: db | Apr 19, 2012 11:40:00 AM


  18. If anyone should ever read the comments on this and the other gay blog, one could only walk away with the feeling that the gay community, at least the ones who comment, are bitter. Yes dear think Bette Davis, BIT TER. Why would the death of a magazine give you so much joy? Take a look at the dismally designed gaylist and look at the current issue of OUT and you tell me, which one are you GOING to read?
    You all need to lighten up and not celebrate the wrong things as you usually do.

    Posted by: matt | Apr 19, 2012 12:11:33 PM


Post a comment









« «The Political Science of President Obama's LGBT Employment Non-Discrimination Failure« «