Jennifer Lopez’s Boyfriend Not At Gay Peepshow, Say Barbers

JLoStarThe tabloids Star and InTouch claimed yesterday that Casper Smart, the dancer best known as Jennifer Lopez's boyfriend, was caught coming out of a gay peepshow in Manhattan. Now they couple are threatening to sue the pubs.

If they follow through, perhaps they'll call four barbers to the stand: the men told the site RumorFix that Smart only went to the establishment to use the ATM.

"Four New York barbers are coming to the defense of Casper Smart, arguing that the dancer was in fact in their hair salon, not a male peep show next door as previously reported by a tabloid," the site says. "The men, who work at Diamond Cuts in Manhattan, claim [Casper] forgot to bring cash. Since they did not have an ATM of their own on the property upstairs, he went downstairs near the ‘peep show’ entry to get cash."

I've gone into a peepshow place solely to use an ATM, so it does happen.

Comments

  1. jason says

    Why is it that when a man expresses interest in men, he’s forced into the false choice or gay or straight? Yet, if a woman expresses interest in women (fake or genuine), the media calls her “open-minded” and “cute”, and certainly no threat to her relationship with a male?

    It proves that there is still this huge double standard out there being propagated by liberals in the entertainment industry. It should be a huge concern that, despite years of legal progress, the entertainment industry still engages in what I consider to be homophobic pigeon-holing when it comes to men.

  2. johnny says

    “I’ve gone into a peepshow place solely to use an ATM, so it does happen.”

    Ahem. Oh sure, no problem, me too. LOL…

    I can’t believe anyone still calls them “peep shows”… makes it sound like watching men from the 1890s show their muscles in grainy black and white… instead of triple-X, full-color, man-on-man porn.

  3. MarkUs says

    Yeah, I’m sure being JLo’s kept boy-dancer he uses the hair cut place upstairs or next door from the “gay peep show”. His hair is getting a little shaggy, isn’t it.

  4. Please says

    This might have been believable if we hadn’t seen that old picture of him in short glittery gold shorts with his tounge hanging out surrounded by men in their underwear.

  5. DK says

    Does this lawsuit even have legs? Which lawsuit was it that found that being described as “gay” is no longer defamatory? Or is it the implication of “adultery?”

Leave A Reply