Comments

  1. Gus says

    The highest level of Republican politicians hate Romney. The reason is you cannot tell which Romney you will meet in a debate. This guy is a shape-shifting salesman telling you his new computer program will solve all you company’s problems and six months later you are constantly on the phone with tech support.

  2. kp05 says

    President Obama will only see gains from this clear win if the swing state newspapers run him as the headlining winner. If they call it a tie, like last debate, it won’t matter much.

  3. johnny says

    Amazing.. if that’s true KP05, then this country is nothing more than a bunch of “me too” that will jump on whatever is most popular. It explains the yard signs.

    From what I saw, the president would say something intelligent and correct and then Romney would simply parrot it with a few extra words thrown in. He was Mr. Carbon Copy last night.

  4. says

    @gus: perfectly expressed. Romney had the air of a snake oil salesman peddling a cure-all, but without feeling the need to explain further.

  5. says

    Romney should had known that his first debate “win” (he only “won” because Obama was obviously holding back) was too easy. Barack played the classic “rope-a-dope” maneuver, and R. Money fell for it, hook, line and sinker.

    Mitt got pimp slapped in Round 2, and finally got knocked the f*ck out in the Final Round.

  6. Moz's says

    CNN ” just within the survey’s sampling error”

    is not accurate

    the CNN margin of error is 4.5%

    so Obama win is 3.5% greater than the margin of error so Obama clearly won

    who are you going to believe your lying eyes or the crack whores obviously working the cnn spin room?

    O 48% vs romney 40%

    margin of error 4.5%

    repubs +8 sample greater than repub vs dems in general population

    = Clear Obama win

  7. ratbastard says

    Oh come on. Americans United for Change are a partisan organization, their ‘polling’ is tainted.

    I think it was a tie, but frankly both these characters actually said very little of substance.