Barack Obama | Guns | Mitt Romney | News

'Dark Knight Rises' Shooting Survivor Demands a Plan from Romney and Obama on Gun Violence: VIDEO

S_barton

Aurora, Colorado shooting survivor Steve Barton is featured in a powerful new ad and website asking voters to demand a plan from President Obama and Republican Mitt Romney on gun violence.

"This past summer in a movie theater I was shot in the face and neck. But I was lucky. In the next four years, 48,000 Americans won't be so lucky. Because they'll be murdered with guns in the next presidential term."

Watch, AFTER THE JUMP...

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. the guns are secondary.

    primary is access to affordable mental health care FOR ALL.

    Posted by: redball | Oct 1, 2012 2:41:43 PM


  2. Outlaw murder then. Oh wait. Outlaw using guns to kill people then. Oh wait.

    Posted by: joe | Oct 1, 2012 2:43:34 PM


  3. What it CAN start with outlawing, Joe, are these ridiculous dozens-of-bullets-in-a-minute clips that Bush shuttered the regulations on. No one needs 100 rounds of ammo per clip for hunting OR for home protection, the two legal, valid uses for guns.

    Posted by: Cody | Oct 1, 2012 2:45:49 PM


  4. exceptional work.
    this is not a first second or third plan for whoever enters the white house...gun laws have been constantly been skirted and killed in the house and executive branches by the nra.
    i say outlaw the nra

    Posted by: io.caprone | Oct 1, 2012 2:47:19 PM


  5. the most galling thing about the pro-gun nuts is that they refuse to be intellectually honest.

    what discussions were there after Columbine? uh, attacks on the music industry. not on how bloody easy it is for any insane person to get guns and ammo. i mean come ON.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Oct 1, 2012 2:49:48 PM


  6. There won't be. The NRA's bought the Republican Party and the Democratic party's scared of them.

    As for my opinion, I completely understand the purpose of the second amendment, but it's loudest defenders have taken it to mean the ability to convert the basement into an arms factory. Let's get real folks - if the government wanted to take over you and your property, they're bound to have some insane weaponry you likely wouldn't be able to keep legally anyways.

    Posted by: Lio | Oct 1, 2012 3:04:18 PM


  7. the worst thing about the Second Amendment apologists/abusers is that they put more effort into screaming about "their right" to own and carry guns than to work toward creating a culture where fewer people FEEL A NEED TO ACT UPON THAT RIGHT.

    a society of armed-citizens is a society that has failed itself.

    Posted by: Rick | Oct 1, 2012 3:14:40 PM


  8. NPR ran an interview of Texas gun owners recently that I really found frightening. Let me also say I'm American Indian and we always had rifles because a lot of our meat supply came from deer and elk. But in Texas, the people interviewed had a conspiracy theory tied to Obama doing treaty negotiations with other countries in terms of limiting arms control, and they were convinced this was some sort of "back door" way of taking away all of their guns. They also fantasize that because of the NRA, it's almost impossible for the government to ban guns, so they believe it will instead try to regulate ammunition. Just so, they order ammo literally by the thousands.

    Posted by: Ty Nolan | Oct 1, 2012 3:15:19 PM


  9. Guns will never be banned in America, nor should they be. We have a second amendment that explicitly allows us to bear arms. However, high-capacity magazines should be outlawed, and there should be mental health screening for anyone who wants to buy a gun. Guns don't kill people. People kill people.

    Posted by: Luke | Oct 1, 2012 3:16:44 PM


  10. "a society of armed-citizens is a society that has failed itself."


    ....Switzerland?

    Posted by: nico | Oct 1, 2012 3:17:03 PM


  11. The US has a very high violent crime rate in relation to it's per capita gun ownership rate. Also, about half the victims of gun violence are suicides.

    Posted by: anon | Oct 1, 2012 3:29:01 PM


  12. also what is the connection between the above posts by 'LITTLEKIWI' and 'RICK' which link to the same blog?

    Posted by: nico | Oct 1, 2012 3:29:16 PM


  13. All this "guns don't kill people" stuff is crap. Access to guns + no screening + people + bad situations = unnecessary deaths. It's possible to intervene at any point, we don't just have to use one reductive solution.

    The second amendment needs to be struck down.

    Posted by: AT | Oct 1, 2012 3:32:30 PM


  14. Nico, that was me. Duh :D

    i like messing with that plebe :)

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Oct 1, 2012 3:39:31 PM


  15. Kiwi before posting as Rick don't forget to change your URL when u switch anonymous aliases. Autofill's not your friend today! LOL

    Posted by: Mark | Oct 1, 2012 3:59:51 PM


  16. But it makes a good point ;-)

    Posted by: Rick | Oct 1, 2012 4:08:47 PM


  17. Actually the endless arguments between you two have gotten really old and sort of ruined the comments section of this site. I wish that Andy would ban Rick/Jason/Ratbastard so that productive discussions could return instead of whiny, repetitive so-called debates.

    But Kiwi, using someone else's name to make them look stupid (when he already does that quite well for himself) isn't exactly mature.

    Posted by: Anon | Oct 1, 2012 4:55:44 PM


  18. I'm all for registration-required commenting, yo.

    and you're right. the debates are stupid. one side speaks the truth, the other uses the internet as their burqa to scream a lie from the darkness.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Oct 1, 2012 5:03:30 PM


  19. How do we know the CIA or some government agency is not brainwashing some person using Hypnosis and drugs to go out and shoot somebody so that people will demand gun control and that way take away our last defense, if a mad men should try and take over our government. Read your history books and you will see it always happens from time to time and it can happen again.

    Posted by: Bob | Oct 1, 2012 5:36:52 PM


  20. Bob, whatever you're supposed to be "on" I suggest your double your dosage.

    read your history books and remember that if the kind of weapons available today were available a century ago the country would have been wiped out.

    I don't get America. I don't get it. Who are you idiots who care more about the 'freedom' to carry a gun than living in a culture where people feel no *need* to act upon that freedom?

    You wanna know freedom? It's walking around unarmed and unafraid.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Oct 1, 2012 5:40:39 PM


  21. It's funny how some accuse the gun lobby of being dishonest, while the anti-gun lobby is AT LEAST as dishonest.

    Calling any gun that looks scary an "assault rifle" when in reality it operates no different than any standard semi-automatic weapon? Focusing on "high capacity magazines?" Tell me, how on earth would forcing the gunman to take less than 1.5 seconds (and yes, magazines can easily be switched in that time) to switch mags really have changed any outcome? You think someone hell-bent on killing others is going to think "oh man, I really want to kill all these people, but that extra arm movement really just isn't worth it?"

    I mean, come on.

    Posted by: Jack | Oct 1, 2012 5:45:37 PM


  22. why should someone hell-bent on killing someone even have access to guns and ammo?

    the problem, America, is that it's way too easy for your looniest nutbags to arm themselves.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Oct 1, 2012 5:50:31 PM


  23. Because there are no such thing as background checks? There is no 100% fool-proof way to ensure that nobody intending harm gets their hand on a gun. Period.

    Posted by: Jack | Oct 1, 2012 5:58:12 PM


  24. @AT, the second amendment definitely should not be struck down, and you're living in a fantasy world if you think it ever will be. People kill people, not guns. If there wasn't a gun around, a person hell bent on killing someone will just use something else to kill them with.

    Posted by: Luke | Oct 1, 2012 6:04:33 PM


  25. the 2nd amendment is not so we can be armed against other citizens, it is so we can be equally as armed as the government so we can fight back if they try to take away our rights and liberties. So we do need those clips, guns, etc.

    Posted by: Miles | Oct 1, 2012 7:16:16 PM


  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «Baltimore Ravens' Matt Birk Wants to Keep Marriage from Gays« «