Barack Obama | News | Proposition 8 | Supreme Court

BigGayDeal.com

White House 'Still Weighing' SCOTUS Brief Opposing Prop 8

The Obama administration is still thinking about whether or not to file a SCOTUS brief opposing Proposition 8 while Thursday's deadline looms, the NYT reports:

WhitehouseA White House official said Tuesday morning that no decision has been made on whether to file an amicus brief; the deadline is Thursday. The Wall Street Journal, citing unnamed sources, reported Tuesday evening that the administration was still weighing its decision, and is “looking at options that fall short of embracing a constitutional right'’ to same-sex marriage.

Mr. Obama has made supporting same-sex marriage a central theme in his recent speeches, including his second inaugural address and has often stated that Americans ought to have equal rights, “no matter who you love.” He announced during his re-election campaign last year that, after months of saying his views were “evolving,” he had concluded gay couples ought to be allowed to marry.

Meanwhile, the WSJ (subscription) reports that Obama is concerned that opposing Prop 8 could annoy conservative justices, according to Business Insider:

"[A]dministration lawyers worry that taking such an expansive view in legal briefs could unnerve some justices in the Supreme Court's conservative wing, the people familiar with the matter said," the Journal reported.

Will it or will it not file is today's biggest question.

Inauguration_obamaThe NYT looks at the dangers of Obama NOT filing and tells him to do so:

The outcome of the Proposition 8 case is likely to affect the lives of gay, lesbian and bisexual Americans for years to come, even if the final disposition is not sweeping enough to wipe out all state laws currently banning same-sex marriage. A strong filing by the Justice Department, forthrightly declaring that denying the freedom to marry violates the Constitution, would put the full weight of the federal government on the side of justice and could influence the shape of the ruling.

For the administration to be missing in action in this showdown risks conveying a message to the justices that it lacks confidence in the constitutional claims for ending gay people’s exclusion from marriage or that it believes Americans are not ready for a high court ruling making marriage equality the law of the land — impressions strikingly contradicted by legal precedent, the lessons of history and by the president’s own very powerful words.

Adds John Aravosis at Americablog:

It’s entirely possible that the Justice Department, or someone else in the Obama administration, has found a non-gay reason for why they don’t want to file a brief in the Prop 8 case.  They’re afraid that somehow, somewhere, in some way filing a Prop 8 brief will negatively affect some other unrelated thing that they care about.

It’s just a hunch. But it’s the most logical explanation I can find for why no brief has been forthcoming in light of the overwhelming evidence in favor of them filing such a brief.

Either way, if no brief is filed, the administration is going to have to come up with a much better explanation for their actions.  The current non-explanation is not only not cutting it (triple negative, I know), but considering that everyone and his brother has now filed a brief in the case – even the Mormons have weighed in (spoiler alert: the Mormons have chosen the gay-bashing side) – the administration’s absence runs the risk of speaking volumes to the court, and beyond.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. Fierce ally, indeed.

    Posted by: Jack | Feb 27, 2013 11:20:02 AM


  2. As with all issues of concern to the queer community, he will weigh in on the side of equality after we have done all the work (see DADT).

    Posted by: Kevin | Feb 27, 2013 12:28:57 PM


  3. Judging by the reported comments just now by Scalia, on the Voting Rights Act, the sooner we have an all liberal Supreme Court the better......9 liberals by 2018 !
    The right wing must die.

    Posted by: JackFknTwist | Feb 27, 2013 12:48:46 PM


  4. I know this is dissappointing to a lot of folks but take a step back from the emotion of it and think about this for a second:

    Yes, it would be nice if he led more strongly on the issue. But this is strictly political - he's got NOTHING to lose as far as a future in politics, he is done with politics in January 2017. He has made NO BONES about his support (verbally) for our community...he was the first president in history to specifically mention our issues in an inaugural address.

    BUT...the things to keep in mind are the idea of separation of powers/checks and balances and states rights. While this is now a federal issue, he has taken a stand on DoMA, the DOJ has filed in that case. Prop 8 is a state issue brought to federal court. Can the president file in the case? Certainly. But...should he stay out of it and let the courts decide... Probably. We have the potential to win reversals of both DoMA and Prop 8 in the SCOTUS. The 3 arch conservatives on the court will vote no. The 4 liberals will vote yes. The question becomes...what will Kennedy do? He could go either way. Roberts likely will go with the conservatives...but as with the ACA, he has shown that he is more concerned with his legacy than we have initially been led to believe. He may not want his legacy to be denying civil rights. On the flip side, he has also shown that he is an egotistical little pratt... If Obama steps into his arena, could Roberts vote against Prop 8 just as a matter of principle to assert his own power (and show that his penis is just as big as the black man's).

    While I am glad Mr. Obama has taken a strong and administratively active stand on DoMA, I think politically I would rather he strongly state his support for marriage equality as he has now done BUT not try to interfere with the process. I don't see any benefit from his DOJ filing a brief (other than a "good feeling" for our community) but I do see possible negative outcomes for his interference.

    Posted by: Jay | Feb 27, 2013 12:51:59 PM


  5. Proposition 8 is concerns a state referendum. The DOJ is not obligated to file an amicus brief. It would be gratuitous. The DOJ only need to be concerned with DOMA, which is a national law.

    Posted by: jamal49 | Feb 27, 2013 1:05:07 PM


  6. WTF is wrong with some of you guys. Obama could ride down the street on a float in a gay pride parade and that would never be enough for some of you.

    Posted by: Frank | Feb 27, 2013 1:45:54 PM


  7. Maybe his position will evolve...

    Posted by: bareback rider | Feb 27, 2013 4:32:31 PM


Post a comment







Trending


« «Republican Brief Opposing Prop 8 Now Includes More Than 100+ Names, Including Beth Myers, Marilyn Musgrave« «